Interprofessional barriers in patient flow management: an interview study of the views of emergency department staff involved in patient admissions

被引:7
作者
Boiko, Olga [1 ]
Edwards, Matthew [2 ]
Zschaler, Steffen [3 ]
Miles, Simon [3 ]
Rafferty, Anne Marie [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Fac Publ Hlth & Policy, Dept Hlth Serv Res & Policy, 15-17 Tavistock Pl, London WC1H 9SH, England
[2] Kings Coll Hosp London, Emergency Dept, London, England
[3] Kings Coll London, Fac Nat & Math Sci, Dept Informat, London, England
[4] Kings Coll London, Florence Nightingale Fac Nursing & Midwifery & Pa, Dept Adult Nursing, London, England
[5] Royal Coll Nursing UK, London, England
关键词
Patient flow; interprofessional barriers; knotworking; emergency admissions; INTENSIVE-CARE; HEALTH-CARE; TEAMWORK; MULTITASKING; PERCEPTIONS; HANDOFFS; TEAMS; BLOCK;
D O I
10.1080/13561820.2020.1760223
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Patient flow in emergency departments (EDs) is notoriously difficult to manage efficiently. While much of the attention has focused on the procedures, protocols and pathways in which patients receive their first hours of care, less attention has been paid to the relational factors that make it happen. Our study is the first, to our knowledge, to consider the role of interprofessional barriers, defined as suboptimal ways of working, as perceived by ED staff in patient flow management. Drawing on 19 interviews with hospital staff in an acute tertiary trauma center hospital in England, we established three flow-related types of interprofessional barriers: ED teamwork barriers, performance-driven coordination barriers, and referral-related collaborative barriers. Knotworking was recognized as a form of interactions and asset to teamworking, coordination, and collaboration. Identifying processes such as chasing, escalating, and advocating enabled our investigation to highlight a very complex set of interprofessional interactions, and signpost what the suboptimal practices of flow management are. Our analysis holds promise for hospitals beyond the National Health Service in England.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 342
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2010, INTERPRESSIONAL TE
  • [2] Communicating in the "'Gray zone": Perceptions about emergency physician-hospitalist handoffs and patient safety
    Apker, Julie
    Mallak, Larry A.
    Gibson, Scott C.
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2007, 14 (10) : 884 - 894
  • [3] Effects of multidisciplinary teamwork on lead times and patient flow in the emergency department: a longitudinal interventional cohort study
    Athlin, Asa Muntlin
    Schwarz, Ulrica von Thiele
    Farrohknia, Nasim
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA RESUSCITATION & EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2013, 21
  • [4] Balancing intertwined responsibilities: A grounded theory study of teamwork in everyday intensive care unit practice
    Bjurling-Sjoberg, Petronella
    Wadensten, Barbro
    Poder, Ulrika
    Jansson, Inger
    Nordgren, Lena
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2017, 31 (02) : 233 - 244
  • [5] Working in "teams" in an era of "liquid" healthcare: What is the use of theory?
    Bleakley, Alan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2013, 27 (01) : 18 - 26
  • [6] Braun V., 2006, Qual. Res. Psychol, V3, P77, DOI DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA
  • [7] Colvin J., 2017, QUALITATIVE RES MED, V1, DOI [10.4081/qrmh.2017.7115, DOI 10.4081/QRMH.2017.7115]
  • [8] An evaluation of the referral process in the emergency department
    Croft, Susan J.
    Barnes, Jane
    Ginnis, Clare
    Chatters, Robin
    Mason, Suzanne
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2014, 31 (10) : 827 - 832
  • [9] Engestrodm Y., 2008, TEAMS KNOTS ACTIVITY
  • [10] Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work
    Engeström, Y
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 2000, 43 (07) : 960 - 974