Efficacy of Hemospray in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:18
作者
Mutneja, Hemant Raj [1 ]
Bhurwal, Abhishek [2 ]
Go, Andrew [3 ]
Sidhu, Gurpartap Singh [1 ]
Arora, Shilpa [4 ]
Attar, Bashar M. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] John H Stroger Jr Hosp Cook Cty, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Robert Wood Johnson Univ Hosp, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[3] Loyola Univ Med Ctr, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
Hemospray; upper gastrointestinal bleeding; meta-analysis; systematic review; ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT; HEMOSTATIC POWDER; HEMORRHAGE; MANAGEMENT; EXPERIENCE; SAFETY; ULCERS; TC-325;
D O I
10.15403/jgld-660
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background & Aims: Hemospray is a non-contact modality of endoscopic hemostasis that has been used in the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) with varying success. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of Hemospray in the management of UGIB. Methods: An electronic bibliographic search of digital dissertation databases was performed from inception till October 2019. All prospective studies, including randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of Hemospray in the management of UGIB were analysed. The primary outcome was immediate haemostasis and the secondary outcome was rebleeding rate. Subgroup analyses based on etiology of UGIB (tumour-related, variceal, etc) were also performed. Results: A total of 11 prospective studies, including 4 randomized trials were included for the analysis. The pooled immediate haemostasis rate with Hemospray was 93% (95% CI 90.3-95%, p<0.001). Rebleeding occurred in 14.4% (95% CI 8.8-22.8%, p<0.001) of patients. For the subgroup of tumour-related bleeding, the immediate haemostasis rate was 95.3% (95% CI 89.6-97.3%; p<0.001) and rebleeding rate was 21.9% (95% CI 13.9-32.7%, p<0.001). In patients with variceal bleeding, immediate haemostasis was achieved in 92.7% (95% CI 83.6-96.9%; p<0.001) of patients, with a rebleeding rate of 3.1% (95% CI 0.9-10.2%, p<0.001). Conclusion: Hemospray shows high immediate haemostasis and low bleeding percentages. The odds were in its favour compared to conventional endoscopic modalities, but not statistically significant. The results are undermined by the risk of bias in the studies. Nevertheless, it is an easy technique that should be further investigated with better studies.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 76
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   The in-hospital mortality rate for upper GI hemorrhage has decreased over 2 decades in the United States: a nationwide analysis [J].
Abougergi, Marwan S. ;
Travis, Anne C. ;
Saltzman, John R. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (04) :882-+
[2]   Outcomes from an international multicenter registry of patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding undergoing endoscopic treatment with Hemospray [J].
Alzoubaidi, Durayd ;
Hussein, Mohamed ;
Rusu, Radu ;
Napier, Duncan ;
Dixon, Selena ;
Rey, Johannes W. ;
Steinheber, Cora ;
Jameie-Oskooei, Sina ;
Dahan, Martin ;
Hayee, Bu ;
Gulati, Shraddha ;
Despott, Edward ;
Murino, Alberto ;
Subramaniam, Sharmila ;
Moreea, Sulleman ;
Boger, Phil ;
Hu, Maxworth ;
Duarte, Patricia ;
Dunn, Jason ;
Mainie, Inder ;
McGoran, John ;
Graham, David ;
Anderson, John ;
Bhandari, Pradeep ;
Goetz, Martin ;
Kiesslich, Ralf ;
Coron, Emmanuel ;
Lovat, Laurence ;
Haidry, Rehan .
DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 32 (01) :96-105
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, NEWCASTLE OTTAWA SCA, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10654-010-9491-Z
[4]  
[Anonymous], HEM HEM
[5]   Randomized controlled trial of hemostatic powder versus endoscopic clipping for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding [J].
Baracat, Felipe Iankelevich ;
de Moura, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux ;
Brunaldi, Vitor Ottoboni ;
Tranquillini, Caio Vinicius ;
Baracat, Renato ;
Sakai, Paulo ;
de Moura, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (01) :317-324
[6]   TC-325 hemostatic powder versus current standard of care in managing malignant GI bleeding: a pilot randomized clinical trial [J].
Chen, Yen-I ;
Wyse, Jonathan ;
Lu, Yidan ;
Martel, Myriam ;
Barkun, Alan N. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 91 (02) :321-+
[7]  
Cochrane Methods, ROB 2 REV COCHR RISK
[8]   Endoscopic hemostatic devices [J].
Conway, Jason D. ;
Adler, Douglas G. ;
Diehl, David L. ;
Farraye, Francis A. ;
Kantsevoy, Sergey V. ;
Kaul, Vivek ;
Kethu, Sripathi R. ;
Kwon, Richard S. ;
Mamula, Petar ;
Rodriguez, Sarah A. ;
Tierney, William M. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 69 (06) :987-996
[9]   Efficacy of hemostatic powders in upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Facciorusso, Antonio ;
Takahashi, Marcelo Straus ;
Postula, Ceren Eyileten ;
Buccino, Vincenzo Rosario ;
Muscatiello, Nicola .
DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2019, 51 (12) :1633-1640
[10]   Meta-analysis: predictors of rebleeding after endoscopic treatment for bleeding peptic ulcer [J].
Garcia-Iglesias, P. ;
Villoria, A. ;
Suarez, D. ;
Brullet, E. ;
Gallach, M. ;
Feu, F. ;
Gisbert, J. P. ;
Barkun, A. ;
Calvet, X. .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2011, 34 (08) :888-900