Evaluation of the dynamics of microalgae population structure and process performance during piggery wastewater treatment in algal-bacterial photobioreactors

被引:74
作者
Garcia, Dimas [1 ,2 ]
Posadas, Esther [1 ]
Blanco, Saul [3 ]
Acien, Gabriel [4 ]
Garcia-Encina, Pedro [1 ]
Bolado, Silvia [1 ]
Munoz, Raul [1 ]
机构
[1] Valladolid Univ, Dept Chem Engn & Environm Technol, Dr Mergelina S-N, Valladolid 47011, Spain
[2] CIRA UNAN Managua, Ctr Invest Recursos Acuat Nicaragua, Apdo Postal 4598, Managua, Nicaragua
[3] Inst Environm, La Serna 58, Leon 24007, Spain
[4] Univ Almeria, Dept Chem Engn, Canada San Urbano S-N, Almeria 04120, Spain
关键词
Algal-bacterial processes; Biomass production; Heavy metal removal; Microalgae dynamics; Piggery wastewater treatment; NUTRIENT REMOVAL; CULTIVATION; WASTEWATERS; EFFICIENCY; NITROGEN; CYANOBACTERIA; PHOSPHORUS; BIODIESEL; BIOMASS; CARBON;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.079
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The dynamics of microalgae population during piggery wastewater (PWW) treatment in four open photobioreactors operated at 27 days of hydraulic retention time, and inoculated with Chlorella sp. (R1), Acutodesmus obliquus (R2), Oscillatoria sp. (R3) and in the absence of inoculum (R4), were evaluated for 6 months. In addition, the algal-bacterial biomass concentration, removal of organic matter, nutrients and heavy metals were also assessed. The results revealed a high diversity and rapid variations in the structure of microalgae populations, Chlorella sp. being dominant in R4 throughout most of the operational period. Steady state average biomass concentration ranged from 2445-2610 mg/L in R1-R3 to 3265 mg/L in R4. No significant differences were recorded in the removal efficiencies (REs) of total organic carbon (86-87%), inorganic carbon (62-71%), total nitrogen (82-85%) and total phosphorous (90-92%). Finally, Zn-REs accounted for 26% in R3, 37% in R2, and 49% in R1 and R4. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 126
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Efficiency of removal of nitrogen, phosphorus, and zinc from domestic wastewater by a constructed wetland system in rural areas: a case study [J].
Abe, Kaoru ;
Komada, Michio ;
Ookuma, Akihito .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 58 (12) :2427-2433
[2]   Estimation of Zn and Cu unit output loads from animal husbandry facilities [J].
Abe, Kaoru ;
Waki, Miyoko ;
Suzuki, Kazuyoshi ;
Kasuya, Masahiro ;
Suzuki, Ryouji ;
Itahashi, Sunao ;
Banzai, Kenji .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 66 (03) :653-658
[3]   Microalgal species growing on piggery wastewater as a valuable candidate for nutrient removal and biodiesel production [J].
Abou-Shanab, Reda A. I. ;
Ji, Min-Kyu ;
Kim, Hyun-Chul ;
Paeng, Ki-Jung ;
Jeon, Byong-Hun .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 115 :257-264
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, STANDARD METHODS EXA, V16th
[5]  
Bastos R.G., 2014, DESALIN WATER TREAT, V3994, P1
[6]   Biohydrogen Production: Strategies to Improve Process Efficiency through Microbial Routes [J].
Chandrasekhar, Kuppam ;
Lee, Yong-Jik ;
Lee, Dong-Woo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2015, 16 (04) :8266-8293
[7]   Cultivation in wastewaters for energy: A microalgae platform [J].
Cheah, Wai Yan ;
Ling, Tau Chuan ;
Show, Pau Loke ;
Juan, Joon Ching ;
Chang, Jo-Shu ;
Lee, Duu-Jong .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 179 :609-625
[8]   Long-term operation of high rate algal ponds for the bioremediation of piggery wastewaters at high loading rates [J].
de Godos, Ignacio ;
Blanco, Saul ;
Garcia-Encina, Pedro A. ;
Becares, Eloy ;
Munoz, Raul .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 100 (19) :4332-4339
[9]   Ecotoxicological evaluation of pig slurry [J].
De la Torre, AI ;
Jiménez, JA ;
Carballo, M ;
Fernandez, C ;
Roset, J ;
Muñoz, MJ .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2000, 41 (10) :1629-1635
[10]   Comparing the use of different domestic wastewaters for coupling microalgal production and nutrient removal [J].
Dominguez Cabanelas, Iago Teles ;
Ruiz, Jesus ;
Arbib, Zouhayr ;
Chinalia, Fabio Alexandre ;
Garrido-Perez, Carmen ;
Rogalla, Frank ;
Nascimento, Iracema Andrade ;
Perales, Jose A. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 131 :429-436