A Comparative Evaluation of Commercially Available Cell-Based Allografts in a Rat Spinal Fusion Model

被引:5
作者
Johnstone, Brian [1 ]
Zhang, Nianli [2 ]
Waldorff, Erik, I [2 ]
Semler, Eric [3 ]
Dasgupta, Anouska [3 ]
Betsch, Marcel [1 ]
Punsalan, Paolo [1 ]
Cho, Holly [1 ]
Ryaby, James T. [2 ]
Yoo, Jung [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Orthopaed & Rehabil, 3181 Sw Sam Jackson Pk Rd, Portland, OR 97202 USA
[2] Orthofix Med Inc, Lewisville, TX 75056 USA
[3] MTF Biol, Edison, NJ USA
关键词
Posterolateral spine fusion; athymic rat; stem cells; allograft; Trinity Evolution; Trinity ELITE; Osteocel Plus; DEMINERALIZED BONE-MATRIX; GRAFTS;
D O I
10.14444/7026
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: To evaluate the comparative abilities of commercially available, viable, cellular bone allografts to promote posterolateral spinal fusion. Methods: Human allografts containing live cells were implanted in the athymic rat model of posterolateral spine fusion. Three commercially available allogeneic cellular bone matrices (Trinity Evolution, Trinity ELITE and Osteocel Plus) were compared with syngeneic iliac crest bone as the control. All spines underwent radiographs, manual palpation, and micro-computed tomography (CT) analysis after excision at 6 weeks. Histological sections of randomly selected spines were subjected to semiquantitative histopathological scoring for bone formation. Results: By manual palpation, posterolateral fusion was detected in 40% (6/15) of spines implanted with syngeneic bone, whereas spines implanted with Trinity Evolution and Trinity ELITE allografts yielded 71% (10/14) and 77% (10/13) fusion, respectively. Only 7% (1/14) of spines implanted with Osteocel Plus allografts were judged fused by manual palpation (statistically significantly less than ELITE, P < .0007, and Evolution, P < .0013). The mineralized cancellous bone component of the allografts confounded radiographic analysis, but Trinity Evolution (0.452 +/- 0.064) and Trinity ELITE (0.536 +/- 0.109) allografts produced statistically significantly higher bone fusion mass volumes measured by quantitative micro-CT than did syngeneic bone (0.292 +/- 0.109, P < .0001 for ELITE and P < .003 for Evolution) and Osteocel Plus (0.258 +/- 0.103, P < .0001). Semiquantitative histopathological scores supported these findings because the total bone and bone marrow scores reflected significantly better new bone and marrow formation in the Trinity groups than in the Osteocel Plus group. Conclusions: The Trinity Evolution and Trinity ELITE cellular bone allografts were more effective at creating posterolateral fusion than either the Osteocel Plus allografts or syngeneic bone in this animal model.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 221
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] The role of Osteocel Plus as a fusion substrate in minimally invasive instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Ammerman, Joshua M.
    Libricz, Joseph
    Ammerman, Matthew D.
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 115 (07) : 991 - 994
  • [2] 1998 Volvo Award winner in basic science studies - Lumbar spine fusion by local gene therapy with a cDNA encoding a novel osteoinductive protein (LMP-1)
    Boden, SD
    Titus, L
    Hair, G
    Liu, YS
    Viggeswarapu, M
    Nanes, MS
    Baranowski, C
    [J]. SPINE, 1998, 23 (23) : 2486 - 2492
  • [3] A bridging demineralized bone implant facilitates posterolateral lumbar fusion in New Zealand White rabbits
    Choi, Yongsoo
    Oldenburg, F. Parke
    Sage, Latifa
    Johnstone, Brian
    Yoo, Jung U.
    [J]. SPINE, 2007, 32 (01) : 36 - 41
  • [4] Determining a Clinically Relevant Strategy for Bone Tissue Engineering: An "All-in-One" Study in Nude Mice
    Corre, Pierre
    Merceron, Christophe
    Vignes, Caroline
    Sourice, Sophie
    Masson, Martial
    Durand, Nicolas
    Espitalier, Florent
    Pilet, Paul
    Cordonnier, Thomas
    Mercier, Jacques
    Remy, Severine
    Anegon, Ignacio
    Weiss, Pierre
    Guicheux, Jerome
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (12):
  • [5] Augmentation of spinal arthrodesis with autologous bone marrow in a rabbit posterolateral spine fusion model
    Curylo, LJ
    Johnstone, B
    Petersilge, CA
    Janicki, JA
    Yoo, JU
    [J]. SPINE, 1999, 24 (05) : 434 - 438
  • [6] Grauer Jonathan N, 2004, Spine J, V4, P281
  • [7] Prospective, Multicenter Evaluation of Allogeneic Bone Matrix Containing Viable Osteogenic Cells in Foot and/or Ankle Arthrodesis
    Jones, Carroll P.
    Loveland, Jeffrey
    Atkinson, Brent L.
    Ryaby, James T.
    Linovitz, Raymond J.
    Nunley, James A.
    [J]. FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 36 (10) : 1129 - 1137
  • [8] HARVESTING AUTOGENOUS ILIAC BONE-GRAFTS - A REVIEW OF COMPLICATIONS AND TECHNIQUES
    KURZ, LT
    GARFIN, SR
    BOOTH, RE
    [J]. SPINE, 1989, 14 (12) : 1324 - 1331
  • [9] The efficacy of different commercially available demineralized bone matrix substances in an athymic rat model
    Lee, YP
    Jo, M
    Luna, M
    Chien, B
    Lieberman, JR
    Wang, JC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2005, 18 (05): : 439 - 444
  • [10] Park JJ, 2013, BULL HOSP JT DIS, V71, P39