Social arrangements. Kinship, descent and affinity in the mortuary architecture of Early Neolithic Britain and Ireland

被引:14
作者
Fowler, Chris [1 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Sch Hist Class & Archaeol, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
Kinship; descent; affinity; chambered tombs; Neolithic Britain and Ireland; DATE; PERSONHOOD; LIFE; TRANSFORMATION; MONUMENTS; DIVERSITY; WESTERN; PLACES;
D O I
10.1017/S1380203821000210
中图分类号
K85 [文物考古];
学科分类号
0601 ;
摘要
This article reassesses the social significance of Early Neolithic chambered tombs. It critically evaluates inferences about social organization drawn from tomb architecture and interpretations of kinship based on aDNA analyses of human remains from tombs. Adopting the perspective that kinship is a multifaceted and ongoing field of practice, it argues that the arrangement of tomb chambers was related to the negotiation of Early Neolithic kinship. Drawing together inferences about biological relatedness from aDNA analyses with interpretations of chamber arrangements, it suggests that variation in the architectural arrangements and sequential modification of chambered tombs relates to different ways of negotiating aspects of kinship, particularly descent and affinity. It presents interpretations of how kinship was negotiated at Early Neolithic tombs in different regions of Britain and Ireland and concludes that it is increasingly possible to gauge pattern and diversity in Neolithic negotiations of kinship, descent and affinity by combining different strands of evidence, including architectural arrangement.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 88
页数:22
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]  
Banfield E, 2018, THESIS LEICESTER U
[2]   Talking about my generation: the date of the West Kennet long barrow [J].
Bayliss, Alex ;
Whittle, Alasdair ;
Wysocki, Michael .
CAMBRIDGE ARCHAEOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 17 (01) :85-101
[3]   One thing after another: the date of the Ascott-under-Wychwood long barrow [J].
Bayliss, Alex ;
Benson, Don ;
Galer, Dawn ;
Humphrey, Louise ;
McFadyen, Lesley ;
Whittle, Alasdair .
CAMBRIDGE ARCHAEOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 17 (01) :29-44
[4]   Thinking Gender Differently: New Approaches to Identity Difference in the Central European Neolithic [J].
Bickle, Penny .
CAMBRIDGE ARCHAEOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 30 (02) :201-218
[5]  
Bloch Maurice., 1971, Placing the Dead: Tombs, Ancestral Villages, and Kinship Organization in Madagascar
[6]   A stranger in a strange land: a perspective on archaeological responses to the palaeogenetic revolution from an archaeologist working amongst palaeogeneticists [J].
Booth, Thomas J. .
WORLD ARCHAEOLOGY, 2019, 51 (04) :586-601
[7]  
BORIC D., 2008, PREHISTORIC EUROPE T, P109
[8]   Ancient genomes indicate population replacement in Early Neolithic Britain [J].
Brace, Selina ;
Diekmann, Yoan ;
Booth, Thomas J. ;
van Dorp, Lucy ;
Faltyskova, Zuzana ;
Rohland, Nadin ;
Mallick, Swapan ;
Olalde, Inigo ;
Ferry, Matthew ;
Michel, Megan ;
Oppenheimer, Jonas ;
Broomandkhoshbacht, Nasreen ;
Stewardson, Kristin ;
Martiniano, Rui ;
Walsh, Susan ;
Kayser, Manfred ;
Charlton, Sophy ;
Hellenthal, Garrett ;
Armit, Ian ;
Schulting, Rick ;
Craig, Oliver E. ;
Sheridan, Alison ;
Pearson, Mike Parker ;
Stringer, Chris ;
Reich, David ;
Thomas, Mark G. ;
Barnes, Ian .
NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2019, 3 (05) :765-771
[9]   Ancient DNA, kinship and relational identities in Bronze Age Britain [J].
Bruck, Joanna .
ANTIQUITY, 2021, 95 (379) :228-237
[10]  
Carlos Valera, 2020, MONUMENTALISING LIFE, P195