Magnetic sphincter augmentation and fundoplication for GERD in clinical practice: one-year results of a multicenter, prospective observational study

被引:66
作者
Riegler, Martin [1 ]
Schoppman, Sebastian F. [1 ]
Bonavina, Luigi [2 ]
Ashton, David [3 ]
Horbach, Thomas [4 ]
Kemen, Matthias [5 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Surg, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Milan, Sch Med, IRCCS Policlin San Donato, Div Gen Surg,Dept Biomed Sci Hlth, Milan, Italy
[3] Reflux Ctr, London, England
[4] Municipal Hosp Schwabach, Dept Surg, Schwabach, Germany
[5] Univ Duisburg Essen, Evangel Krankenhaus Herne, Akad Lehrkrankenhaus, Herne, Germany
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2015年 / 29卷 / 05期
关键词
Antireflux surgery; GERD; LINX; Fundoplication; Regurgitation; Proton-pump inhibitors; HIATAL-HERNIA; REFLUX; MANAGEMENT; SURGERY; SAFETY; ACID;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-014-3772-7
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The techniques available for antireflux surgery have expanded with the introduction of the magnetic sphincter augmentation device (MSAD) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). A prospective, multicenter registry evaluated MSAD and laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) in clinical practice (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01624506). Data collection included baseline characteristics, reflux symptoms, proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) use, side effects, and complications. Post-surgical evaluations were collected at one year. At report, 249 patients (202 MSAD patients and 47 LF patients) had completed one-year follow-up. The LF group was older and had a greater frequency of large hiatal hernias and Barrett's esophagus than the MSAD group (P < 0.001). The median GERD-health related quality of life score improved from 20.0 to 3.0 after MSAD and 23.0 to 3.5 after LF. Moderate or severe regurgitation improved from 58.2 to 3.1 % after MSAD and 60.0 to 13.0 % after LF (P = 0.014). Discontinuation of PPIs was achieved by 81.8 % of patients after MSAD and 63.0 % after LF (P = 0.009). Excessive gas and abdominal bloating were reported by 10.0 % of patients after MSAD and 31.9 % following LF (P a parts per thousand currency sign 0.001). Following MSAD, 91.3 % of patients were able to vomit if needed, compared with 44.4 % of those undergoing LF (P < 0.001). Reoperation rate was 4.0 % following MSAD and 6.4 % following LF. Antireflux surgery should be individualized to the characteristics of each patient, taking into consideration anatomy and propensity and tolerance of side effects. Both MSAD and LF showed significant improvements in reflux control, with similar safety and reoperation rates. In the treatment continuum of antireflux surgery, MSAD should be considered as a first-line surgical option in appropriately selected patients without Barrett's esophagus or a large hiatal hernia in order to avoid unnecessary dissection and preserve the patient's native gastric anatomy. MSAD is an important treatment option and will expand the surgeon's role in treating GERD.
引用
收藏
页码:1123 / 1129
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Long-term Safety Concerns with Proton Pump Inhibitors [J].
Ali, Tauseef ;
Roberts, David Neil ;
Tierney, William M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 122 (10) :896-903
[2]   One Hundred Consecutive Patients Treated with Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: 6 Years of Clinical Experience from a Single Center [J].
Bonavina, Luigi ;
Saino, Greta ;
Bona, Davide ;
Sironi, Andrea ;
Lazzari, Veronica .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 217 (04) :577-585
[3]  
Castell DO, 2002, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V97, P575
[4]   Effects of refluxate pH values on duodenogastroesophageal reflux-induced esophageal adenocarcinoma [J].
Cheng, Peng ;
Li, Jian-Sheng ;
Gong, Jun ;
Zhang, Lian-Feng ;
Chen, Rong-Zhong .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 17 (25) :3060-3065
[5]  
Fohl Alexander L, 2011, World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther, V2, P17, DOI 10.4292/wjgpt.v2.i3.17
[6]   Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery vs Esomeprazole Treatment for Chronic GERD The LOTUS Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Galmiche, Jean-Paul ;
Hatlebakk, Jan ;
Attwood, Stephen ;
Ell, Christian ;
Fiocca, Roberto ;
Eklund, Stefan ;
Langstrom, Goran ;
Lind, Tore ;
Lundell, Lars .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 305 (19) :1969-1977
[7]   Use of a magnetic sphincter for the treatment of GERD: a feasibility study [J].
Ganz, Robert A. ;
Gostout, Christopher J. ;
Grudem, Jerry ;
Swanson, William ;
Berg, Todd ;
DeMeester, Tom R. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 67 (02) :287-294
[8]  
Ganz RA, 2013, NEW ENGL J MED, V368, P719, DOI [10.1056/NEJMc1303656, 10.1056/NEJMoa1205544]
[9]   Minimal access surgery compared with medical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: five year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial (REFLUX) [J].
Grant, A. M. ;
Cotton, S. C. ;
Boachie, C. ;
Ramsay, C. R. ;
Krukowski, Z. H. ;
Heading, R. C. ;
Campbell, M. K. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 346
[10]   NERD, GERD, and Barrett's Esophagus: Role of Acid and Non-acid Reflux Revisited with Combined pH-Impedance Monitoring [J].
Gutschow, Christian A. ;
Bludau, Marc ;
Valloehmer, Daniel ;
Schroeder, Wolfgang ;
Bollschweiler, Elfriede ;
Hoelscher, Arnulf H. .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2008, 53 (12) :3076-3081