Stochastic dominance statistics for risk averters and risk seekers: an analysis of stock preferences for USA and China

被引:38
作者
Bai, Zhidong [1 ,2 ]
Li, Hua [3 ]
Mcaleer, Michael [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Wong, Wing-Keung [8 ]
机构
[1] NE Normal Univ, KLASMOE, Changchun, Peoples R China
[2] NE Normal Univ, Sch Math & Stat, Changchun, Peoples R China
[3] Changchun Univ, Sch Sci, Changchun, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Tsing Hua Univ, Dept Quantitat Finance, Hsinchu, Taiwan
[5] Erasmus Univ, Inst Econometr, Erasmus Sch Econ, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] Tinbergen Inst, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[7] Univ Complutense Madrid, Dept Quantitat Econ, Madrid, Spain
[8] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Econ, WLB, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
日本学术振兴会; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
C12; G0; Risk-seeking; Hypothesis testing; Test statistic; Risk aversion; Stochastic dominance; MEAN-VARIANCE; MARKET CRASHES; EFFICIENCY; UTILITY; CHOICE; TESTS;
D O I
10.1080/14697688.2014.943273
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We derive the limiting process of stochastic dominance statistics for risk averters as well as for risk seekers when the underlying processes are dependent or independent. We take account of the dependency of the partitions and propose a bootstrap method to decide the critical point. In addition, we illustrate the applicability of the stochastic dominance statistics for both risk averters and risk seekers to analyse the dominance relationship between the Chinese and US stock markets in the entire period as well as the sub-periods before and after the crises, including the internet bubble and the recent sub-prime crisis. The findings could be used to draw inferences on the preferences of risk averters and risk seekers in investing in the Chinese and US stock markets. The results also enable us to examine whether there are arbitrage opportunities in these markets, and whether these markets are efficient and investors are rational.
引用
收藏
页码:889 / 900
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[31]   MUTUAL FUND PERFORMANCE [J].
SHARPE, WF .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 1966, 39 (01) :119-138
[32]   THE SHARPE RATIO [J].
SHARPE, WF .
JOURNAL OF PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, 1994, 21 (01) :49-58
[33]  
Sriboonchitta S., 2009, STOCHASTIC DOMINANCE
[34]   GAMBLING WITH THE HOUSE MONEY AND TRYING TO BREAK EVEN - THE EFFECTS OF PRIOR OUTCOMES ON RISKY CHOICE [J].
THALER, RH ;
JOHNSON, EJ .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1990, 36 (06) :643-660
[35]   GENERALIZATION OF THE THEOREM OF GLIVENKO-CANTELLI [J].
WOLFOWITZ, J .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1954, 25 (01) :131-138
[36]   Prospect and Markowitz stochastic dominance [J].
Wong W.-K. ;
Chan R.H. .
Annals of Finance, 2008, 4 (1) :105-129
[37]  
Wong W-K., 2008, Pacific-Basin finance journal, V16, P204, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.PACFIN.2007.07.001
[38]   Preferences over location-scale family [J].
Wong, Wing-Keung ;
Ma, Chenghu .
ECONOMIC THEORY, 2008, 37 (01) :119-146
[39]   Stochastic dominance and mean-variance measures of profit and loss for business planning and investment [J].
Wong, Wing-Keung .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 182 (02) :829-843
[40]   A note on convex stochastic dominance [J].
Wong, WK ;
Li, CK .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1999, 62 (03) :293-300