The Effect of Hyperosmolar Water-Soluble Contrast for the Management of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:4
作者
Klingbeil, Kyle D. D. [1 ]
Wu, James X. X. [1 ]
Osuna-Garcia, Antonia [2 ]
Livingston, Edward H. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] UCLA Sch Med, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] UCLA Biomed Lib Louise M Darling, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
intestinal obstruction; tissue adhesions; small bowel obstruction; contrast media; ORAL GASTROGRAFIN; FOLLOW-THROUGH; OPERATIVE INTERVENTION; TRIAL; AGENT;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000005573
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective:To better understand the efficacy of water-soluble contrast (WSC) in the treatment of adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO). Background:Guidelines recommend using WSC to treat adhesive SBO nonoperatively by acting as a cathartic agent. The evidence supporting this practice is mixed. Methods:A systematic review and meta-analysis of published articles describing the effect of WSC compared with control treatments was performed for the period of January 1, 1990 to November 1, 2021. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias and the Newcastle-Ottawa tools. The therapeutic effect of WSC was assessed by operative rates and hospital length of stay (HLOS) in nonsurgical patients. Results:The initial search yielded 4879 articles, of which, 28 were selected for full text review. We identified 11 eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which included 817 patients and 9 observational studies of 3944 patients. HLOS in nonsurgical patients decreased by 1.95 days (95% confidence interval: 0.56-3.3) in the RCTs and could not be assessed in the observational studies. WSC did not significantly affect operative rates in the RCTs (19.8% vs. 21.4%) but did reduce rates in the observational studies (11% vs. 16%, risk ratio: 0.56, 95% confidence interval: 0.39-0.82). Conclusion:WSC studies may reduce HLOS for patients who have SBO and do not require surgery. However, the current literature is heterogenous with considerable design limitations. High-quality RCTs are needed using standardized protocols to determine the full benefit of WSC for the management of SBO.
引用
收藏
页码:981 / 988
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Laparoscopy or laparotomy for adhesive bowel obstruction in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Miyake, Hiromu
    Seo, Shogo
    Pierro, Agostino
    [J]. PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 34 (02) : 177 - 182
  • [22] Use of water-soluble contrast medium (gastrografin) does not decrease the need for operative intervention nor the duration of hospital stay in uncomplicated acute adhesive small bowel obstruction? A multicenter, randomized, clinical trial (Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction Study) and systematic review
    Scotte, Michel
    Mauvais, Francois
    Bubenheim, Michael
    Cosse, Cyril
    Suaud, Leslie
    Savoye-Collet, Celine
    Plenier, Isabelle
    Pequignot, Aurelien
    Yzet, Thierry
    Regimbeau, Jean Marc
    [J]. SURGERY, 2017, 161 (05) : 1315 - 1325
  • [23] Determination of therapeutic strategy for adhesive small bowel obstruction using water-soluble contrast agents: An audit of 776 cases in a single center
    Mori, Haruki
    Kaneoka, Yuji
    Maeda, Atsuyuki
    Takayama, Yuichi
    Takahashi, Takamasa
    Onoe, Shunsuke
    Fukami, Yasuyuki
    [J]. SURGERY, 2017, 162 (01) : 139 - 146
  • [24] The Safety of Expectant Management for Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: A Systematic Review
    Lucas W. Thornblade
    Francys C. Verdial
    Matthew A. Bartek
    David R. Flum
    Giana H. Davidson
    [J]. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2019, 23 : 846 - 859
  • [25] Recurrence of Small Bowel Obstruction in Adults After Operative Management of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: A Systematic Review
    Srinivasan, Nishok Victory
    Khan, Aujala Irfan
    Mashat, Ghadi D.
    Hazique, Mohammad
    Khan, Kokab Irfan
    Ramesh, Prasana
    Kanagalingam, Suthasenthuran
    Ul Haq, Fnu Zargham
    Penumetcha, Sai Sri
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (09)
  • [26] Utilization of ultrasound for the evaluation of small bowel obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gottlieb, Michael
    Peksa, Gary D.
    Pandurangadu, Ananda Vishnu
    Nakitende, Damali
    Takhar, Sukhjit
    Seethala, Raghu R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 36 (02) : 234 - 242
  • [27] Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for small bowel obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lin, You-Cheng
    Yu, Yi-Chung
    Huang, Yu-Ting
    Wu, Yun-Yu
    Wang, Ting-Cheng
    Huang, Wen-Cheng
    Yang, Meng-Duo
    Hsu, Yuan-Pin
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 136
  • [28] A prospective study on the use of water-soluble contrast follow-through radiology in the management of small bowel obstruction
    Chung, CC
    Meng, WCS
    Yu, SCH
    Leung, KL
    Lau, WY
    Li, AKC
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 66 (09): : 598 - 601
  • [29] Laparoscopic versus open approach for adhesive small bowel obstruction, a systematic review and meta-analysis of short term outcomes
    Krielen, Pepijn
    Di Saverio, Salomone
    ten Broek, Richard
    Renzi, Claudio
    Zago, Mauro
    Popivanov, Georgi
    Ruscelli, Paolo
    Marzaioli, Rinaldo
    Chiarugi, Massimo
    Cirocchi, Roberto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2020, 88 (06) : 866 - 874
  • [30] My thoughts: The role of water-soluble contrast challenge for adhesive small bowel obstructionin children
    Fliegner, Maximilian A.
    Finn, Daniel
    Wilhelm, Spencer
    Keeley, Jacob
    Stallion, Anthony
    Novotny, Nathan
    Akay, Begum
    Brahmamdam, Pavan
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 236