Innovative work behavior and personality traits: Examining the moderating effects of organizational tenure

被引:104
作者
Woods, Stephen A. [1 ]
Mustafa, Michael James [2 ]
Anderson, Neil [3 ]
Sayer, Benjamin [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Surrey, Surrey Business Sch, Guildford, Surrey, England
[2] Univ Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Nottingham Univ Business Sch, Semenyih, Malaysia
[3] Brunel Univ London, London, England
[4] Aston Univ, Aston Business Sch, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
Innovation; Big Five; Personality; Tenure; Innovative work behaviour; Openness; Conscientiousness; IWB; PREDICTING JOB-PERFORMANCE; CREATIVITY; MODEL; PERCEPTIONS; INVOLVEMENT; EMPLOYEE; DEMANDS; CONSCIENTIOUSNESS; IMPLEMENTATION; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1108/JMP-01-2017-0016
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Purpose The literature on individual differences in innovative work behavior (IWB) reveals inconsistencies in the relations of personality traits and tenure on innovation at work. To provide greater clarity about the effects of these antecedents, the purpose of this paper is to report a study of the moderating effects of tenure on the associations of traits and IWB, and apply a theoretical lens based on the trait-activation theory. Design/methodology/approach In all, 146 employees of a UK-based financial institution completed measures of conscientiousness and openness, and had three aspects of IWB (idea generation, promotion, and realization) rated by their line-supervisor. All participants were on graduate training programs. Hierarchical regression analyses were used to test the moderating effects of tenure on the associations of the self-reported traits with the supervisor-rated IWB outcomes. Findings Tenure moderated the effects of conscientiousness on IWB, with highly conscientious employees being less innovative with longer tenure. Tenure moderated the effect of openness with idea generation with highly open employees generating more ideas if they were longer tenured. Practical implications Management of innovation requires differentiated strategies based on the personality traits and tenure of individual employees. Implications for recruitment, socialization and development are discussed. Originality/value This is the first study to examine empirically the interactions of traits and contextual factors (i.e. organizational tenure) on IWB, framed around a strong theoretical foundation (i.e. trait activation theory). The study also makes notable contributions by measuring innovative behavior using a supervisor-rated and multidimensional approach.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 42
页数:14
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
AMABILE TM, 1988, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V10, P123
[2]   The routinization of innovation research: a constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science [J].
Anderson, N ;
De Dreu, CKW ;
Nijstad, BA .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2004, 25 (02) :147-173
[3]   Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-the-Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework [J].
Anderson, Neil ;
Potocnik, Kristina ;
Zhou, Jing .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2014, 40 (05) :1297-1333
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Psychological Assessment, DOI DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5
[5]   Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas [J].
Axtell, CM ;
Holman, DJ ;
Unsworth, KL ;
Wall, TD ;
Waterson, PE .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 73 :265-285
[6]   The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: Moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity [J].
Baer, Markus ;
Oldham, Greg R. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 91 (04) :963-970
[7]   The Strength-of-Weak-Ties Perspective on Creativity: A Comprehensive Examination and Extension [J].
Baer, Markus .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 95 (03) :592-601
[8]   THE BIG 5 PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB-PERFORMANCE - A METAANALYSIS [J].
BARRICK, MR ;
MOUNT, MK .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 44 (01) :1-26
[9]   Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? [J].
Barrick, MR ;
Mount, MK ;
Judge, TA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2001, 9 (1-2) :9-30
[10]   The great eight competencies: A criterion-centric approach to validation [J].
Bartram, D .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 90 (06) :1185-1203