Another failed attempt of neuroprotection: progesterone for moderate and severe traumatic brain injury

被引:0
作者
Meyfroidt, Geert [1 ]
Taccone, Fabio S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Intens Care Med, Herestr 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] ULB, Hop Erasme, Dept Intens Care, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Brain injuries; Progesterone; Neuroprotection; Treatment outcome; CLINICAL-TRIAL; NERVOUS-SYSTEM; OUTCOMES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Two large phase-III prospective, multicenter, controlled, double-blind, randomized clinical trials (the PROTECT III study; the SYNAPSE study) evaluated the effectiveness of an early administration of progesterone in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). In the PROTECT III Trial, patients were included if the admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was within 4-12, whereas the SYNAPSE Trial only included patients with GCS 4-8. The total dose of progesterone was nearly similar in both studies and drug administration was initiated early after injury (within 4 hours for a total of 96 hours in PROTECT; within 8 hours for 120 hours in SYNAPSE). In the PROTECT Trial, primary outcome was 6-month favourable neurological outcome (defined using the Glasgow Outcome Scale), while in the SYNAPSE Trial it was the 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). Secondary outcomes, in both studies, included 6-month mortality. The PROTECT Trial was interrupted for futility after the second interim analysis (882 patients randomized out of the 1140 initially planned); the SYNAPSE Trial included 1195 patients. In PROTECT, the proportion of patients with favourable outcome was similar between groups (51% for progesterone vs. 56% for placebo; RR 3.03 [95% CI 1.96-4.66]); in SYNAPSE, no difference in GOS between the progesterone and placebo group was found (OR 0.96 [95% CI 0.771.18]). There was no difference in 6-month mortality or any of the other secondary outcomes between groups in the two trials. These studies demonstrated that early progesterone administration did not provide any benefit on the neurological recovery of TBI patients.
引用
收藏
页码:486 / 491
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Aminmansour Bahram, 2012, Adv Biomed Res, V1, P58, DOI 10.4103/2277-9175.100176
[2]   HORMONAL STATE AFFECTS RECOVERY FROM FRONTAL-CORTEX LESIONS IN ADULT FEMALE RATS [J].
ATTELLA, MJ ;
NATTINVILLE, A ;
STEIN, DG .
BEHAVIORAL AND NEURAL BIOLOGY, 1987, 48 (03) :352-367
[3]  
Brain Trauma Foundation, 2007, J Neurotrauma, V24 Suppl 1, pS37
[4]   Therapeutic effects of progesterone and its metabolites in traumatic brain injury may involve non-classical signaling mechanisms [J].
Cooke, Paul S. ;
Nanjappa, Manjunatha K. ;
Yang, Zhihui ;
Wang, Kevin K. W. .
FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 7
[5]   Progesterone's role in neuroprotection, a review of the evidence [J].
Deutsch, Eric R. ;
Espinoza, Tamara R. ;
Atif, Fahim ;
Woodall, Elise ;
Kaylor, Jordan ;
Wright, David W. .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 2013, 1530 :82-105
[6]  
Hyder AA, 2007, NEUROREHABILITATION, V22, P341
[7]   Why most published research findings are false [J].
Ioannidis, JPA .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2005, 2 (08) :696-701
[8]   Neuroprotection for traumatic brain injury: translational challenges and emerging therapeutic strategies [J].
Loane, David J. ;
Faden, Alan I. .
TRENDS IN PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2010, 31 (12) :596-604
[9]   Neurocognitive Development of Children 4 Years After Critical Illness and Treatment With Tight Glucose Control A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Mesotten, Dieter ;
Gielen, Marijke ;
Sterken, Caroline ;
Claessens, Kirsten ;
Hermans, Greet ;
Vlasselaers, Dirk ;
Lemiere, Jurgen ;
Lagae, Lieven ;
Gewillig, Marc ;
Eyskens, Benedicte ;
Vanhorebeek, Ilse ;
Wouters, Pieter J. ;
Van den Berghe, Greet .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 308 (16) :1641-1650
[10]   Cerebrospinal Fluid Cortisol and Progesterone Profiles and Outcomes Prognostication after Severe Traumatic Brain Injury [J].
Santarsieri, Martina ;
Niyonkuru, Christian ;
McCullough, Emily H. ;
Dobos, Julie A. ;
Dixon, C. Edward ;
Berga, Sarah L. ;
Wagner, Amy K. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2014, 31 (08) :699-712