Do Firms' Efforts Matter? An Innovation Mechanism in Public Technology Commercialization

被引:6
作者
Bong, Kang Ho [1 ]
Shin, Yoonmi [2 ]
Park, Jaemin [1 ]
机构
[1] Konkuk Univ, Dept Management Technol, Seoul 05029, South Korea
[2] Commercializat Promot Agcy R&D Outcomes, Seoul 03737, South Korea
关键词
Commercialization; Technological innovation; Research and development; Government; Technology transfer; Investment; Numerical analysis; Innovation process; public technology; technology commercialization; technology readiness level (TRL); technology transfer; TRL gap; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; UNIVERSITY-RESEARCH; SCIENCE; GOVERNMENT; DETERMINANTS; CAPABILITIES; PERFORMANCE; EFFICIENCY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1109/TEM.2020.3025695
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article aims to understand the effect of firms' application development activities when introducing new technologies from universities or public institutes on the success of commercialization and corporate growth. Technology itself does not guarantee corporate growth; instead, it is commercialization that contributes more to achieving a sustainable competitive edge, as it offers economic value. We collected samples on the commercialization performance of start-ups that adopted the technology of universities or public research institutes and measured the intensity of the firms' application development activities as the gap between the technology readiness levels (TRLs) at the time of technology acquisition and the firms' current TRL. Our findings show that the process of transferring technology to firms is mediated by the firms' application development performance. Most notably, we first observed that firms' investments in commercialization have no significant direct effect on commercialization success; instead, we found that this relationship is mediated by the TRL gap. This article suggests that it is necessary to consider the entire process-from the technology transfer to firms to successful commercialization-to form a mechanism under which universities and research institutes can create substantial additional value and allow their research to realize their full potential.
引用
收藏
页码:2987 / 2996
页数:10
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]   The mediating role of an innovative culture in the relationship between absorptive capacity and technical and non-technical innovation [J].
Ali, Murad ;
Park, Kichan .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2016, 69 (05) :1669-1675
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, J TECHNOL TRANSFER
[3]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[4]   In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition [J].
Cassiman, B ;
Veugelers, R .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2006, 52 (01) :68-82
[5]   Understanding technology management as a dynamic capability: A framework for technology management activities [J].
Cetindamar, Dilek ;
Phaal, Robert ;
Probert, David .
TECHNOVATION, 2009, 29 (04) :237-246
[6]  
Chehrehpak Mehri, 2018, International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, V23, P273, DOI 10.1504/ijpqm.2018.089801
[7]  
Chesbrough H., 2003, Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology
[8]   Maximizing the returns from research [J].
Christensen, CM ;
Musso, CS ;
Anthony, SD .
RESEARCH-TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2004, 47 (04) :12-18
[9]  
Cohen W. M., 1997, ADMINIST SCI Q, V35, P128
[10]   Do banks or VCs spur small firm growth? [J].
Cole, Rebel ;
Cumming, Douglas ;
Li, Dan .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2016, 41 :60-72