Artificial Intelligence System Approaching Neuroradiologist-level Differential Diagnosis Accuracy at Brain MRI

被引:90
作者
Rauschecker, Andreas M. [1 ,2 ]
Rudie, Jeffrey D. [2 ]
Xie, Long [2 ]
Wang, Jiancong [2 ]
Duong, Michael Tran [2 ]
Botzolakis, Emmanuel J. [3 ]
Kovalovich, Asha M. [2 ]
Egan, John [2 ]
Cook, Tessa C. [2 ]
Bryan, R. Nick [4 ]
Nasrallah, Ilya M. [2 ]
Mohan, Suyash [2 ]
Gee, James C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, Parnassus Ave,Room S-261,Box 0628, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Hosp Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Mecklenburg Radiol Associates, Charlotte, NC USA
[4] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Radiol, Austin, TX 78712 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
RADIOLOGY; SEGMENTATION;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2020190283
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Although artificial intelligence (AI) shows promise across many aspects of radiology, the use of AI to create differential diagnoses for rare and common diseases at brain MRI has not been demonstrated. Purpose: To evaluate an AI system for generation of differential diagnoses at brain MRI compared with radiologists. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study tested performance of an AI system for probabilistic diagnosis in patients with 19 common and rare diagnoses at brain MRI acquired between January 2008 and January 2018. The AI system combines data-driven and domain-expertise methodologies, including deep learning and Bayesian networks. First, lesions were detected by using deep learning. Then, 18 quantitative imaging features were extracted by using atlas-based coregistration and segmentation. Third, these image features were combined with five clinical features by using Bayesian inference to develop probability-ranked differential diagnoses. Quantitative feature extraction algorithms and conditional probabilities were fine-tuned on a training set of 86 patients (mean age, 49 years +/- 16 [standard deviation]; 53 women). Accuracy was compared with radiology residents, general radiologists, neuroradiology fellows, and academic neuroradiologists by using accuracy of top one, top two, and top three differential diagnoses in 92 independent test set patients (mean age, 47 years +/- 18; 52 women). Results: For accuracy of top three differential diagnoses, the AI system (91% correct) performed similarly to academic neuroradiologists(86% correct; P =.20), and better than radiology residents (56%; P<.001), general radiologists (57%; P<.001), andneuroradiology fellows (77%; P =.003). The performance of the AI system was not affected by disease prevalence (93% accuracyfor common vs 85% for rare diseases; P =.26). Radiologists were more accurate at diagnosing common versus rare diagnoses (78%vs 47% across all radiologists; P<.001). Conclusion: An artificial intelligence system for brain MRI approached overall top one, top two, and top three differential diagnoses accuracy of neuroradiologists and exceeded that of less-specialized radiologists. (C) RSNA, 2020
引用
收藏
页码:626 / 637
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Abadi M., 2016, TENSORFLOW LARGE SCA, P3243, DOI DOI 10.5555/3026877.3026899
[2]   It is About "Time": Academic Neuroradiologist Time Distribution for Interpreting Brain MRIs [J].
Al Yassin, Altaib ;
Sadaghiani, Mohammad Salehi ;
Mohan, Suyash ;
Bryan, R. Nick ;
Nasrallah, Ilya .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2018, 25 (12) :1521-1525
[3]  
[Anonymous], V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neu
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Statistical methods in diagnostic medicine
[5]   A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration [J].
Avants, Brian B. ;
Tustison, Nicholas J. ;
Song, Gang ;
Cook, Philip A. ;
Klein, Arno ;
Gee, James C. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2011, 54 (03) :2033-2044
[6]   Integration of Chest CT CAD into the Clinical Workflow and Impact on Radiologist Efficiency [J].
Brown, Matthew ;
Browning, Patrick ;
Wahi-Anwar, M. Wasil ;
Murphy, Mitchell ;
Delgado, Jayson ;
Greenspan, Hayit ;
Abtin, Fereidoun ;
Ghahremani, Shahnaz ;
Yaghmai, Nazanin ;
da Costa, Irene ;
Becker, Moshe ;
Goldin, Jonathan .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2019, 26 (05) :626-631
[7]   Understanding and Confronting Our Mistakes: The Epidemiology of Error in Radiology and Strategies for Error Reduction [J].
Bruno, Michael A. ;
Walker, Eric A. ;
Abujudeh, Hani H. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2015, 35 (06) :1668-1676
[8]   Bayesian networks: Computer-assisted diagnosis support in radiology [J].
Burnside, ES .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2005, 12 (04) :422-430
[9]   Hybrid 3D/2D Convolutional Neural Network for Hemorrhage Evaluation on Head CT [J].
Chang, P. D. ;
Kuoy, E. ;
Grinband, J. ;
Weinberg, B. D. ;
Thompson, M. ;
Homo, R. ;
Chen, J. ;
Abcede, H. ;
Shafie, M. ;
Sugrue, L. ;
Filippi, C. G. ;
Su, M. -Y. ;
Yu, W. ;
Hess, C. ;
Chow, D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2018, 39 (09) :1609-1616
[10]   Deep learning algorithms for detection of critical findings in head CT scans: a retrospective study [J].
Chilamkurthy, Sasank ;
Ghosh, Rohit ;
Tanamala, Swetha ;
Biviji, Mustafa ;
Campeau, Norbert G. ;
Venugopal, Vasantha Kumar ;
Mahajan, Vidur ;
Rao, Pooja ;
Warier, Prashant .
LANCET, 2018, 392 (10162) :2388-2396