The effects of R&D subsidies and network embeddedness on R&D output: evidence from the German biotech industry

被引:27
作者
Buchmann, Tobias [1 ,2 ]
Kaiser, Micha [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hohenheim, Chair Innovat Econ, Stuttgart, Germany
[2] Ctr Solar Energy & Hydrogen Res Baden Wurttemberg, Stuttgart, Germany
[3] Univ Hohenheim, Chair Household & Consumer Econ, Stuttgart, Germany
[4] CCMP, Friedrichshafen, Germany
关键词
R&D policy; policy evaluation; innovation networks; biotech; KNOWLEDGE NETWORKS; TECHNOLOGY POLICY; INNOVATION; FIRMS; ADDITIONALITY; COLLABORATION; PERFORMANCE; INTENSITY; PROXIMITY; MODELS;
D O I
10.1080/13662716.2018.1438247
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Although policy makers subsidize firms' R&D projects to increase innovational output in an industry, region, or country, it remains unclear whether such subsidization triggers additional R&D efforts or crowds out private investments. To address this question, we assess the effectiveness of subsidization for individual and collaborative research in the German biotech industry while also examining the relevance of network embeddedness for patent output. Our results indicate that subsidies do lead to increased patent output, with additional benefits from involvement in more than one project. However, the amount of money is only significant under certain circumstances. Also, it is higher degree centrality in the firm network that significantly increases R&D success.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 294
页数:26
相关论文
共 55 条
[41]   Dipping in the policy mix: Do R&D subsidies foster behavioral additionality effects of R&D tax credits? [J].
Neicu, Daniel ;
Teirlinck, Peter ;
Kelchtermans, Stijn .
ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 25 (03) :218-239
[42]   Firm knowledge and market value in biotechnology [J].
Nesta, Lionel ;
Saviotti, Pier-Paolo .
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2006, 15 (04) :625-652
[43]  
OECD, 2013, REGPAT DAT
[44]   Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology [J].
Powell, WW ;
Koput, KW ;
SmithDoerr, L .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1996, 41 (01) :116-145
[45]  
Pyka A., 2002, European Journal of Innovation Management, V5, P152, DOI [10.1108/14601060210436727, DOI 10.1108/14601060210436727]
[46]  
Rammer C., 2006, 0603 ZEW
[47]   Inter-firm R&D partnering in pharmaceutical biotechnology since 1975: Trends, patterns, and networks [J].
Roijakkers, N ;
Hagedoorn, J .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2006, 35 (03) :431-446
[48]  
Saviotti PP, 2009, UNDERST COMPLEX SYST, P19, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-92267-4_2
[49]  
Serrano-Velarde N., 2008, CROWDING OUT TOP HET
[50]   The dynamics of the inventor network in German biotechnology: geographic proximity versus triadic closure [J].
Ter Wal, Anne L. J. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2014, 14 (03) :589-620