The effect of the duration of propofol administration on recovery from anesthesia in cats

被引:76
作者
Pascoe, PJ [1 ]
Ilkiw, JE [1 ]
Frischmeyer, KJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Sch Vet Med, Dept Surg & Radiol Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
anesthesia; cats; infusions; propofol; recovery;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-2995.2005.00216.x
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Objective To determine the effect of induction, a 30-minute, and a 150-minute infusion of propofol on the rate of recovery in cats. Study design Randomized, cross-over, prospective experimental study. Animals Six healthy adult spayed female cats (mean 4.3, range 2-7 years old) weighing 3.9 +/- 0.5 kg. Methods Cats received each of three treatments: anesthetic induction with propofol (T1), induction followed by a 30-minute infusion (T30) and induction followed by a 150-minute infusion (T150). Propofol infusions were increased or decreased to maintain a sluggish pedal withdrawal reflex. Animals were monitored throughout the anesthetic period and during the recovery. Venous blood samples were collected from a central venous catheter before anesthesia and at 30 minutes for the 30-minute infusion and at 30, 60, 90, 120 and 150 minutes for the 150-minute infusion. The ability of the cat to lift its head, crawl, stand and walk without ataxia was recorded at 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 120, 160, 180, 210 and 240 minutes after the completion of propofol administration. Data from physiological values were analyzed using either a Student's t-test (30-minute infusion) or an ANOVA (150-minute infusion). A nonparametric Friedman test (and post-hoc Tukey's Studentized range test) was used to determine whether there were differences in the time taken to recover. Results were considered significant if p < 0.05. Results Time taken to walk without ataxia was significantly greater in T150 (148 +/- 40 minutes) compared with T1 (80 +/- 15 minutes) and T30 (74 +/- 26 minutes). (No other recovery times were significantly different). Anesthesia with propofol was accompanied by a moderate but significant respiratory depression and a decrease in PCV and total protein. Conclusions and clinical relevance Prolonged anesthesia with propofol in healthy cats may be associated with a delayed recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:2 / 7
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   PHARMACOKINETICS IN LABORATORY-ANIMALS OF ICI 35-868, A NEW IV ANESTHETIC AGENT [J].
ADAM, HK ;
GLEN, JB ;
HOYLE, PA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1980, 52 (08) :743-746
[2]   THE EFFECTS OF CONSECUTIVE DAY PROPOFOL ANESTHESIA ON FELINE RED-BLOOD-CELLS [J].
ANDRESS, JL ;
DAY, TK ;
DAY, DG .
VETERINARY SURGERY, 1995, 24 (03) :277-282
[3]  
BREARLEY JC, 1988, J SMALL ANIM PRACT, V28, P315
[4]   Cytochrome P-4502B6 is responsible for interindividual variability of propofol hydroxylation by human liver microsomes [J].
Court, MH ;
Duan, SX ;
Hesse, LM ;
Venkatakrishnan, K ;
Greenblatt, DJ .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2001, 94 (01) :110-119
[5]   Molecular genetic basis for deficient acetaminophen glucuronidation by cats: UGT1A6 is a pseudogene, and evidence for reduced diversity of expressed hepatic UGT1A isoforms [J].
Court, MH ;
Greenblatt, DJ .
PHARMACOGENETICS, 2000, 10 (04) :355-369
[6]   The role of human lungs in the biotransformation of propofol [J].
Dawidowicz, AL ;
Fornal, E ;
Mardarowicz, M ;
Fijalkowska, A .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 93 (04) :992-997
[7]   Propofol metabolites in man following propofol induction and maintenance [J].
Favetta, P ;
Degoute, CS ;
Perdrix, JP ;
Dufresne, C ;
Boulieu, R ;
Guitton, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 88 (05) :653-658
[8]  
HARTIALA KJ, 1955, ANN MED EXP BIOL FEN, V33, P239
[9]   Pharmacokinetics and anesthetic and cardiopulmonary effects of propofol in red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis) and great horned owls (Bubo virginianus) [J].
Hawkins, MG ;
Wright, BD ;
Pascoe, PJ ;
Kass, PH ;
Maxwell, LK ;
Tell, LA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2003, 64 (06) :677-683
[10]   Effect of variable-dose propofol alone and in combination with two fixed doses of ketamine for total intravenous anesthesia in cats [J].
Ilkiw, JE ;
Pascoe, PJ ;
Tripp, LD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2003, 64 (07) :907-912