Lexical and Phonological Effects in Early Word Production

被引:91
作者
Sosa, Anna V. [1 ]
Stoel-Gammon, Carol [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH | 2012年 / 55卷 / 02期
关键词
normal phonological development; word frequency; PND; age of acquisition; phonotactic probability; intra-word variability; AGE-OF-ACQUISITION; SPEECH PRODUCTION; SIMILARITY NEIGHBORHOODS; PHONOTACTIC PROBABILITY; YOUNG-CHILDREN; LANGUAGE-ACQUISITION; PRODUCTION ACCURACY; NONWORD REPETITION; FREQUENCY; SPOKEN;
D O I
10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0113)
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study examines the influence of word frequency, phonological neighborhood density (PND), age of acquisition (AoA), and phonotactic probability on production variability and accuracy of known words by toddlers with no history of speech, hearing, or language disorders. Method: Fifteen toddlers between 2; 0 (years; months) and 2; 5 produced monosyllabic target words varying in word frequency, PND, AoA, and phonotactic probability. Phonetic transcription was used to determine (a) whole-word variability and (b) proportion of whole-word proximity (PWP; Ingram, 2002) of each target word produced. Results: Results show a significant effect of PND on PWP and variability (words from dense neighborhoods had higher PWP and lower variability than those from sparse neighborhoods), a significant effect of word frequency on variability (high-frequency words were less variable) but not proximity, and a significant effect of AoA on proximity (earlier acquired words had lower PWP) but not variability. Conclusions: Results provide new information regarding the role that lexical and phonological factors play in the speech of young children; specifically, several factors are identified that influence variability of production. Additionally, by examining lexical and phonological factors simultaneously, the current study isolates differential effects of the individual factors. Implications for our understanding of emerging phonological representations are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:596 / 608
页数:13
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Age of acquisition and repetition priming effects on picture naming of children who do and who do not stutter [J].
Anderson, Julie D. .
JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS, 2008, 33 (02) :135-155
[2]   Phonological neighborhood and word frequency effects in the stuttered disfluencies of childron who stutter [J].
Anderson, Julie D. .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2007, 50 (01) :229-247
[3]   Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants [J].
Aslin, RN ;
Saffran, JR ;
Newport, EL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1998, 9 (04) :321-324
[4]   Effects of age of acquisition, age, and repetition priming on object naming [J].
Barry, Christopher ;
Johnston, Robert A. ;
Wood, Rebecca F. .
VISUAL COGNITION, 2006, 13 (7-8) :911-927
[5]  
Beckman M.E., 2000, PAPERS LAB PHONOLOGY, P208
[6]   1ST IN, 1ST OUT - WORD LEARNING AGE AND SPOKEN WORD-FREQUENCY AS PREDICTORS OF WORD FAMILIARITY AND WORD NAMING LATENCY [J].
BROWN, GDA ;
WATSON, FL .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1987, 15 (03) :208-216
[7]  
Bybee J., 2001, Phonology and language use
[8]   SIMILARITY NEIGHBORHOODS OF WORDS IN YOUNG CHILDRENS LEXICONS [J].
CHARLESLUCE, J ;
LUCE, PA .
JOURNAL OF CHILD LANGUAGE, 1990, 17 (01) :205-215
[9]   Lexical development norms for young children [J].
Dale, PS ;
Fenson, L .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS, 1996, 28 (01) :125-127
[10]  
Dodd B., 2005, DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOS