Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Schedule-Dependent Interaction between Docetaxel and Cabozantinib in Human Prostate Cancer Xenograft Models

被引:6
作者
Chen, Wenjun [1 ]
Chen, Rong [1 ]
Li, Jian [1 ]
Fu, Yu [1 ]
Yang, Liang [1 ]
Su, Hong [1 ]
Yao, Ye [1 ]
Li, Liang [1 ]
Zhou, Tianyan [1 ]
Lu, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Pharmaceut, Beijing Key Lab Mol Pharmaceut & New Drug Deliver, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
CELL LUNG-CANCER; PHASE-III TRIAL; TUMOR-GROWTH; SYNERGISTIC INTERACTION; ANTITUMOR EFFICACY; IN-VITRO; INHIBITOR; GEMCITABINE; PACLITAXEL; CHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1124/jpet.117.243931
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
In this work, a semimechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model to quantitatively describe the antitumor activity of docetaxel (Doc) and cabozantinib (Cab) under monotherapy, concurrent therapy, interval therapy, and different sequential therapy in mouse xenograft models of castration-resistant prostate cancer was developed and evaluated. The pharmacokinetics (PK) of Doc and Cab when administered separately and simultaneously were investigated in nude mice, and PD study was conducted in tumor-bearing mice treated with different dosing schedules. The PK interaction between Doc and Cab was expressed by adding the effect of Cab on the clearance of Doc in the PK model. And the PD interaction between the two drugs was demonstrated by the developed PK/PD model through the combination index "phi" Our results showed that the concurrent therapy and Doc followed by Cab (Doc similar to Cab) sequential therapy exhibited better tumor inhibitory efficacy than monotherapy. The Cab followed by Doc (Cab similar to Doc) sequential schedule was less effective than monotherapy, and the interval therapy did not enhance the antitumor efficacy compared with the concurrent therapy. The parameter phi estimated from the PK/PD model quantitatively characterized the action between Doc and Cab. There was no significant PD interaction between Doc and Cab in both the concurrent schedule and the interval schedule, whereas the effect of the two drugs in the "Doc similar to Cab" and "Cab similar to Doc" sequential schedule was synergistic and antagonistic, respectively. The proposed model properly described the antitumor effects of Doc and Cab under different treatment schedules and could be used for dose optimization through model-based simulation.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 25
页数:13
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J CLIN ONCOL S
[2]   Final analysis COMET-2: Cabozantinib (Cabo) versus mitoxantrone/prednisone (MP) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients (pts) with moderate to severe pain who were previously treated with docetaxel(D) and abiraterone (A) and/or enzalutamide (E) [J].
Basch, Ethan M. ;
Sholz, Mark C. ;
De Bono, Johann Sebastian ;
Vogelzang, Nicholas J. ;
De Souza, Paul L. ;
Marx, Gavin M. ;
Vaishampayan, Ulka N. ;
George, Saby ;
Schwarz, James K. ;
Antonarakis, Emmanuel S. ;
O'Sullivan, Joe M. ;
Kelabasty, Arash Rezazadeh ;
Chi, Kim N. ;
Dreicer, Robert ;
Hutson, Thomas E. ;
Mangeshkar, Milan ;
Holland, Jaymoe S. ;
Weitzman, Aaron ;
Scher, Howard I. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (07)
[3]   In Vitro and In Vivo Activity of Cabozantinib (XL184), an Inhibitor of RET, MET, and VEGFR2, in a Model of Medullary Thyroid Cancer [J].
Bentzien, Frauke ;
Zuzow, Marcus ;
Heald, Nathan ;
Gibson, Anna ;
Shi, Yongchang ;
Goon, Leanne ;
Yu, Peiwen ;
Engst, Stefan ;
Zhang, Wentao ;
Huang, Donghui ;
Zhao, Lora ;
Vysotskaia, Valentina ;
Chu, Felix ;
Bautista, Rajana ;
Cancilla, Belinda ;
Lamb, Peter ;
Joly, Alison H. ;
Yakes, F. Michael .
THYROID, 2013, 23 (12) :1569-1577
[4]   PRECLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OF DOCETAXEL [J].
BISSERY, MC .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 31A :S1-S6
[5]  
Buzdar Arnan U., 2003, Cancer Treatment Reviews, V29, P449, DOI 10.1016/S0305-7372(03)00167-1
[6]   Assessment of drug interactions relevant to pharmacodynamic indirect response models [J].
Earp, J ;
Krzyzanski, W ;
Chakraborty, A ;
Zamacona, MK ;
Jusko, WJ .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS, 2004, 31 (05) :345-380
[7]   Combining Nonclinical Experiments with Translational PKPD Modeling to Differentiate Erlotinib and Gefitinib [J].
Eigenmann, Miro J. ;
Frances, Nicolas ;
Hoffmann, Gerhard ;
Lave, Thierry ;
Walz, Antje-Christine .
MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 15 (12) :3110-3119
[8]   Potential for improvement of docetaxel-based chemotherapy: a pharmacological review [J].
Engels, FK ;
Sparreboom, A ;
Mathot, RAA ;
Verweij, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 93 (02) :173-177
[9]  
Fornier MN, 2001, CLIN CANCER RES, V7, P3934
[10]   Phase III study of erlotinib in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: The Tarceva Lung Cancer Investigation Trial [J].
Gatzemeier, Ulrich ;
Pluzanska, Anna ;
Szczesna, Aleksandra ;
Kaukel, Eckhard ;
Roubec, Jaromir ;
De Rosa, Flavio ;
Milanowski, Janusz ;
Karnicka-Mlodkowski, Hanna ;
Pesek, Milos ;
Serwatowski, Piotr ;
Ramlau, Rodryg ;
Janaskova, Terezie ;
Vansteenkiste, Johan ;
Strausz, Janos ;
Manikhas, Georgy Moiseevich ;
Von Pawel, Joachim .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (12) :1545-1552