Residential proximity to naturally occurring asbestos and mesothelioma risk in California

被引:123
作者
Pan, XL
Day, HW
Wang, W
Beckett, LA
Schenker, MB
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Div Environm & Occupat Hlth, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Geol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Stat, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
Cancer Registry case-control study; GIS; malignant mesothelioma; naturally occurring asbestos; occupational exposure to asbestos;
D O I
10.1164/rccm.200412-1731OC
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Rationale: Little is known about environmental exposure to low levels of naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) and malignant mesathelioma (MM) risk. Objectives: To conduct a cancer registry-based case control study of residential proximity to NOA with MM in California. Methods: Incident MM cases (n = 2,908) aged 35 yr or more, diagnosed between 1988 and 1997, were selected from the California Cancer Registry and frequency matched to control subjects with pancreatic cancer (n = 2,908) by 5-yr age group and sex. Control subjects were selected by stratified random sampling from 28,123 incident pancreatic cancers in the same time period. We located 93.7% of subjects at the house or street level at initial diagnosis. Individual occupational exposure to asbestos was derived from the longest held occupation, available for 74% of MM cases and 63% of pancreatic cancers. Occupational exposure to asbestos was determined by a priori classification and confirmed by association with mesothelioma. Main Results: The adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence interval for low, medium, and high probabilities of occupational exposures to asbestos were 1.71 (1.32-2.21), 2.51 (1.91-3.30), and 14.94 (8.37-26.67), respectively. Logistic regression analysis from a subset of 1, 133 mesothelioma cases and 890 control subjects with pancreatic cancer showed that the odds of mesothelioma decreased approximately 6.3% for every 10 km farther from the nearest asbestos source, an odds ratio of 0.937 (95% confidence interval = 0.89S-0.982), adjusted for age, sex, and occupational exposure to asbestos. Conclusions: These data support the hypothesis that residential proximity to NOA is significantly associated with increased risk of MM in California.
引用
收藏
页码:1019 / 1025
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Asbestos and mesothelioma in South Africa [J].
Abratt, RP ;
Vorobiof, DA ;
White, N .
LUNG CANCER, 2004, 45 :S3-S6
[2]  
Agudo A, 2000, AM J IND MED, V37, P159, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(200002)37:2<159::AID-AJIM1>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-0
[4]  
Bernardini P, 2003, G Ital Med Lav Ergon, V25, P408
[5]   Mesothelioma incidence and community asbestos exposure [J].
Berry, M .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 1997, 75 (01) :34-40
[6]  
Cocco P, 1999, AM J IND MED, V35, P9, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199901)35:1<9::AID-AJIM2>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-V
[8]   Malignant pleural mesothelioma in Turkey, 2000-2002 [J].
Emri, S ;
Demir, AU .
LUNG CANCER, 2004, 45 :S17-S20
[9]  
Godleski John J, 2004, Thorac Surg Clin, V14, P479
[10]   Past occupational exposure to asbestos among men in France [J].
Goldberg, M ;
Banaei, A ;
Goldberg, S ;
Auvert, B ;
Luce, D ;
Guéguen, A .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 2000, 26 (01) :52-61