Environmental Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Veterinary Teaching Hospital During a Nonoutbreak Period

被引:44
作者
Hoet, Armando E. [1 ,2 ]
Johnson, Amanda [3 ]
Nava-Hoet, Rocio C. [1 ]
Bateman, Shane [4 ]
Hillier, Andrew [4 ]
Dyce, John [4 ]
Gebreyes, Wondwossen A. [1 ]
Wittum, Thomas E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Coll Vet Med, Dept Vet Prevent Med, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Div Epidemiol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Coll Publ Hlth, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Coll Vet Med, Dept Clin Sci, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
environment; MRSA; nosocomial; veterinary hospital; TRANSMISSION; PREVALENCE; PERSONNEL; OUTBREAK; ANIMALS; HORSE; STAFF; MRSA;
D O I
10.1089/vbz.2010.0181
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Concurrent to reports of zoonotic and nosocomial transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in veterinary settings, recent evidence indicates that the environment in veterinary hospitals may be a potential source of MRSA. The present report is a cross-sectional study to determine the prevalence of MRSA on specific human and animal contact surfaces at a large veterinary hospital during a nonoutbreak period. A total of 156 samples were collected using Swiffers (R) or premoistened swabs from the small animal, equine, and food animal sections. MRSA was isolated and identified by pre-enrichment culture and standard microbiology procedures, including growth on Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with NaCl and oxacillin, and by detection of the mecA gene. Staphylococcal chromosome cassette mec (SCCmec) typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis profile were also determined. MRSA was detected in 12% (19/157) of the hospital environments sampled. The prevalence of MRSA in the small animal, equine, and food animal areas were 16%, 4%, and 0%, respectively. Sixteen of the MRSA isolates from the small animal section were classified as USA100, SCCmec type II, two of which had pulsed-field gel electrophoresis pattern that does not conform to any known type. The one isolate obtained from the equine section was classified as USA500, SCCmec type IV. The molecular epidemiological analysis revealed a very diverse population of MRSA isolates circulating in the hospital; however, in some instances, multiple locations/surfaces, not directly associated, had the same MRSA clone. No significant difference was observed between animal and human contact surfaces in regard to prevalence and type of isolates. Surfaces touched by multiple people (doors) and patients (carts) were frequently contaminated with MRSA. The results from this study indicate that MRSA is present in the environment even during nonoutbreak periods. This study also identified specific surfaces in a veterinary environment that need to be targeted when designing and executing infection control programs.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 615
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Performance standards for antimicrobial testing. 18th Informational supplement M100-S18
[2]   Methicillin-resistant staphylococci in companion animals [J].
Baptiste, KE ;
Williams, K ;
Willams, NJ ;
Wattret, A ;
Clegg, PD ;
Dawson, S ;
Corkill, JE ;
O'Neill, T ;
Hart, CA .
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2005, 11 (12) :1942-1944
[3]   Characteristics of biosecurity and infection control programs at veterinary teaching hospitals [J].
Benedict, Katharine M. ;
Morley, Paul S. ;
Van Metre, David C. .
JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 233 (05) :767-773
[4]   MRSA and the environment: implications for comprehensive control measures [J].
Cimolai, N. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2008, 27 (07) :481-493
[5]   The Molecular Evolution of Hospital- and Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus [J].
Deurenberg, Ruud H. ;
Stobberingh, Ellen E. .
CURRENT MOLECULAR MEDICINE, 2009, 9 (02) :100-115
[6]   Practical disk diffusion method for detection of inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci [J].
Fiebelkorn, KR ;
Crawford, SA ;
McElmeel, ML ;
Jorgensen, JH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (10) :4740-4744
[7]   Prevalence and distribution of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus within the environment and staff of a university veterinary clinic [J].
Heller, J. ;
Armstrong, S. K. ;
Girvan, E. K. ;
Reid, S. W. J. ;
Moodley, A. ;
Mellor, D. J. .
JOURNAL OF SMALL ANIMAL PRACTICE, 2009, 50 (04) :168-173
[8]   Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from a veterinary surgeon and five dogs in one practice [J].
Leonard, FC ;
Abbott, Y ;
Rossney, A ;
Quinn, PI ;
O'Mahony, R ;
Markey, BK .
VETERINARY RECORD, 2006, 158 (05) :155-159
[9]   Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among staff and pets in a small animal referral hospital in the UK [J].
Loeffler, A ;
Boag, AK ;
Sung, J ;
Lindsay, JA ;
Guardabassi, L ;
Dalsgaard, A ;
Smith, H ;
Stevens, KB ;
Lloyd, DH .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2005, 56 (04) :692-697
[10]   Development of a Canadian standardized protocol for subtyping methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis [J].
Mulvey, MR ;
Chui, L ;
Ismail, J ;
Louie, L ;
Murphy, C ;
Chang, N ;
Alfa, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 39 (10) :3481-3485