Radiation-induced acute toxicities after image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for patients with spinal metastases (IRON-1 trial)

被引:23
作者
Sprave, Tanja [1 ,3 ]
Verma, Vivek [2 ]
Foerster, Robert [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Schlampp, Ingmar [1 ,3 ]
Bruckner, Thomas [5 ]
Bostel, Tilman [1 ]
Welte, Stefan Ezechiel [1 ]
Tonndorf-Martini, Eric [1 ]
El Shafie, Rami [1 ]
Nicolay, Nils Henrik [1 ,3 ,6 ]
Debus, Juergen [1 ,3 ]
Rief, Harald [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Heidelberg, Dept Radiat Oncol, Neuenheimer Feld 400, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Allegheny Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Pittsburgh, PA 15212 USA
[3] HIRO, Neuenheimer Feld 280, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Radiat Oncol, Raemistr 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[5] Univ Hosp Heidelberg, Dept Med Biometry, Neuenheimer Feld 305, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[6] German Canc Res Ctr, HIRO, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Spinal bone metastases; Intensity-modulated radiotherapy; Palliative radiotherapy; Toxicity; Side effects; PAINFUL BONE METASTASES; PALLIATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; PROSTATE-CANCER; THERAPY; MANAGEMENT; UPDATE; IMRT; HEAD;
D O I
10.1007/s00066-018-1333-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Radiation therapy (RT) provides an important treatment approach in the palliative care of vertebral metastases, but radiation-induced toxicities in patients with advanced disease and low performance status can have substantial implications for quality of life. Herein, we prospectively compared toxicity profiles of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) vs. conventional three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT). This was a prospective randomized monocentric explorative pilot trial to compare radiation-induced toxicity between IMRT and 3DCRT for patients with spinal metastases. A total of 60 patients were randomized between November 2016 and May 2017. In both cohorts, RT was delivered in 10 fractions of 3aEuro<y each. The primary endpoint was radiation-induced toxicity at 3 months. Median follow-up was 4.3 months. Two patients suffered from grade 3 acute toxicities in the IMRT arm, along with 1 patient in the 3DCRT group. At 12 weeks after treatment (t2), 1 patient reported grade 3 toxicity in the IMRT arm vs. 4 patients in the 3DCRT group. No grade 4 or 5 adverse events occurred in either group. In the IMRT arm, the most common side effects by the end of irradiation (t1) were grade 1-2 xerostomia and nausea in 8 patients each (29.6%), and dyspnea in 7 patients (25.9%). In the 3DCRT group, the most frequent adverse events (t1) were similar: grade 1-2 xerostomia (naEuro<= 10, 35.7%), esophagitis (naEuro< 10, 35.8%), nausea (naEuro<= 10, 35.8%), and dyspnea (naEuro<= 5, 17.9%). This is the first randomized trial to evaluate radiation-induced toxicities after IMRT versus 3DCRT in patients with vertebral metastases. This trial demonstrated an additional improvement for IMRT in terms of acute side effects, although longer follow-up is required to further ascertain other endpoints.
引用
收藏
页码:911 / 920
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Radiother Oncol, V52, P111, DOI 10.1016/S0167-8140(99)00097-3
[2]   Update on the Systematic Review of Palliative Radiotherapy Trials for Bone Metastases [J].
Chow, E. ;
Zeng, L. ;
Salvo, N. ;
Dennis, K. ;
Tsao, M. ;
Lutz, S. .
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 24 (02) :112-124
[3]   Palliative radiotherapy trials for bone metastases: A systematic review [J].
Chow, Edward ;
Harris, Kristin ;
Fan, Grace ;
Tsao, May ;
Sze, Wai M. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (11) :1423-1436
[4]   UPDATE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS ON PALLIATIVE RADIOTHERAPY ENDPOINTS FOR FUTURE CLINICAL TRIALS IN BONE METASTASES [J].
Chow, Edward ;
Hoskin, Peter ;
Mitera, Gunita ;
Zeng, Liang ;
Lutz, Stephen ;
Roos, Daniel ;
Hahn, Carol ;
van der Linden, Yvette ;
Hartsell, William ;
Kumar, Eshwar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (05) :1730-1737
[5]   Clinical features of metastatic bone disease and risk of skeletal morbidity [J].
Coleman, Robert E. .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2006, 12 (20) :6243S-6249S
[6]  
De Bari B, 2011, TUMORI J, V97, P177, DOI 10.1700/667.7780
[7]   Toxicity Profile of IMRT Vs. 3D-CRT in Head and Neck Cancer: A Retrospective Study [J].
Ghosh, Gopa ;
Tallari, Ramanjis ;
Malviya, Anupam .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2016, 10 (09) :XC1-XC3
[8]   Potential for reduced toxicity and dose escalation in the treatment of inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer: A comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), 3D conformal radiation, and elective nodal irradiation [J].
Grills, IS ;
Yan, D ;
Martinez, AA ;
Vicini, FA ;
Wong, JW ;
Kestin, LL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 57 (03) :875-890
[9]   Distinct effects of rectum delineation methods in 3D-confromal vs. IMRT treatment planning of prostate cancer [J].
Guckenberger, Matthias ;
Meyer, Juergen ;
Baier, Kurt ;
Vordermark, Dirk ;
Flentje, Michael .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2006, 1 (1)
[10]   Radiation therapy for the management of painful bone metastases: Results from a randomized trial [J].
Gutierrez Bayard, Lucia ;
Salas Buzona, Maria del Carmen ;
Angulo Pain, Esther ;
de Ingunza Baron, Lourdes .
REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY, 2014, 19 (06) :405-411