Permeability dynamic variation of coal under various confining pressures using LFNMR relaxation method

被引:1
作者
Xia, Peng [1 ,2 ]
Zeng, Fangui [3 ]
Song, Xiaoxia [3 ]
Sun, Beilei [3 ]
Yan, Taotao [3 ]
Li, Wei [4 ]
Meng, Yanjun [3 ]
机构
[1] Guizhou Univ, Resource & Environm Engn Coll, Guiyang 550025, Peoples R China
[2] Key Lab Karst Geol Resources & Environm, Guiyang 550025, Peoples R China
[3] Taiyuan Univ Technol, Dept Earth Sci & Engn, Taiyuan 030024, Peoples R China
[4] Northeast Petr Univ, Inst Unconvent Oil & Gas, Daqing 163318, Peoples R China
关键词
CBM; Coal reservoir; Permeability; Dynamic variation; LFNMR; NUCLEAR-MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; ADSORPTION CAPACITY; NMR RELAXATION; GAS; IMPACT; SHRINKAGE; BEHAVIOR; MATRIX; TURKEY; PORES;
D O I
10.1007/s12517-020-5110-9
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Although an extensive literature has emerged on the use of low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (LFNMR) relaxation spectrometry for the determination of various petrophysical properties of conventional reservoir rocks, relative few papers have reported the use of LFNMR discovering coal characterizations, especially the permeability dynamic variation. In this study, LFNMR measurements were conducted to analyze the permeability dynamic variation under various confining pressures of three coal samples with different metamorphic grades and were compared with the conventional experimental and empirical calculating methods. The results show that low rank coal (MLC) has relatively higher permeability, poorer adsorption capacity, and weaker compressibility compared with medium (TLC) and high rank coals (DQC). The permeability of coal reservoir decreases under the effect of effective stress during coalbed methane (CBM) development, of which the decreasing rate is reduced with confining pressure increasing and R-o,R- max increasing. Both the empirical calculating and LFNMR evaluating methods can be used to reflect permeability of coal reservoirs under low confining pressure condition, while the LFNMR evaluating method is more suitable than the empirical calculating method to reflect coal reservoir permeability under high confining pressure condition.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Illite crystallinity and coal metamorphism for selected central Appalachian coals and shales
    Bayan, M. R.
    Hower, James C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2012, 94 : 167 - 172
  • [2] Close J.C., 1993, HYDROCARBONS COAL, P119, DOI DOI 10.1306/ST38577C5
  • [3] Laboratory characterisation of coal matrix shrinkage, cleat compressibility and the geomechanical properties determining reservoir permeability
    Connell, Luke D.
    Mazumder, S.
    Sander, Regina
    Camilleri, Michael
    Pan, Zhejun
    Heryanto, Deasy
    [J]. FUEL, 2016, 165 : 499 - 512
  • [4] Volumetric strain associated with methane desorption and its impact on coalbed gas production from deep coal seams
    Cui, XJ
    Bustin, RM
    [J]. AAPG BULLETIN, 2005, 89 (09) : 1181 - 1202
  • [5] Correction to Klinkenberg slip theory for gas flow in nano-capillaries
    Fathi, Ebrahim
    Tinni, Ali
    Akkutlu, I. Yucel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2012, 103 : 51 - 59
  • [6] Evaluation of coal structure and permeability with the aid of geophysical logging technology
    Fu, Xuehai
    Qin, Yong
    Wang, Geoff G. X.
    Rudolph, Victor
    [J]. FUEL, 2009, 88 (11) : 2278 - 2285
  • [7] Gas permeability measurements on Australian subbituminous coals: Fluid dynamic and poroelastic aspects
    Gensterblum, Yves
    Ghanizadeh, Amin
    Krooss, Bernhard M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2014, 19 : 202 - 214
  • [8] Guo R, 2007, J CAN PETROL TECHNOL, V46, P49
  • [9] Gas adsorption capacity of Carboniferous coals in the Zonguldak basin (NW Turkey) and its controlling factors
    Gürdal, G
    Yalçin, MN
    [J]. FUEL, 2000, 79 (15) : 1913 - 1924
  • [10] SHRINKAGE OF COAL MATRIX WITH RELEASE OF GAS AND ITS IMPACT ON PERMEABILITY OF COAL
    HARPALANI, S
    SCHRAUFNAGEL, RA
    [J]. FUEL, 1990, 69 (05) : 551 - 556