Effect of water - methanol blends on engine performance at borderline knock conditions in gasoline direct injection engines

被引:37
作者
Miganakallu, Niranjan [1 ]
Yang, Zhuyong [1 ]
Rogoz, Rafal [2 ]
Kapusta, Lukasz Jan [2 ]
Christensen, Cord [3 ]
Barros, Sam [3 ]
Naber, Jeffrey [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan Technol Univ, Houghton, MI 49931 USA
[2] Warsaw Univ Technol, Fac Power & Aeronaut Engn, Inst Heat Engn, Nowowiejska 21-25, PL-00665 Warsaw, Poland
[3] Nostrum Energy LLC, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
Water - Methanol mixtures; Water injection; GDI engines; Engine knock; Engine studies; FUEL CONSUMPTION; DUAL-INJECTION; COMBUSTION; REDUCTION; ECONOMY; POTENTIALS; RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114750
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
One of the limiting factors improving the efficiency of gasoline engines is engine knock. Various techniques including using fuels that result in charge cooling are employed to mitigate knock and improve efficiency. Water and methanol have higher heat of vaporization than gasoline. When water or methanol is injected into the intake manifold, it evaporates by exchanging energy with the charge mixture resulting in charge cooling. This allows the engine to be run with advanced spark timing without engine knock. With this motive, the impact of water methanol injection on the engine performance of a gasoline direct injection engine was investigated. Experimental studies were conducted on a single-cylinder 0.55L engine with a compression ratio of 10.9:1 at 800 kPa net indicated mean effective pressure and 1500 revolutions per minute. Baseline tests without water injection were conducted by direct injection of gasoline fuel blended with 10% ethanol (E10). Four mixtures: 100% water, 75% water + 25% methanol, 50% water + 50% methanol and 100% methanol were used with port injection. Spark ignition timing, flow rate of the fuel and the four mixtures were varied to be within the controlled knock limit while maintaining an excess air ratio of 1.0. Comparisons on the effectiveness of these mixtures indicate that higher methanol content in the mixture helped in reaching the maximum brake torque condition at lower mixture fuel ratios. Combustion stability of the engine was improved with the addition of water and water-methanol blends due to the sensitivity of combustion phasing at advanced spark timings reducing the variation in indicated mean effective pressure. Exhaust gas temperatures decrease with the addition of water and water-methanol blends due to the combined effect of increased charge cooling and improved combustion phasing.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Monitoring of CO2 emissions from passenger cars - Regulation 443/2009 - European Environment Agency (EEA)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, SAE WORLD C, DOI [10.4271/2006-01-0229, DOI 10.4271/2006-01-0229]
[3]   A numerical investigation on the potentials of water injection to increase knock resistance and reduce fuel consumption in highly downsized GDI engines [J].
Berni, Fabio ;
Breda, Sebastiano ;
Lugli, Mattia ;
Cantore, Giuseppe .
69TH CONFERENCE OF THE ITALIAN THERMAL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION, ATI 2014, 2015, 81 :826-835
[4]  
Bhagat M., 2013, 2013010250 SAE, DOI 10.4271/2013-01-0250
[5]   Water injection in directly injected turbocharged spark ignition engines [J].
Boretti, Alberto .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 52 (01) :62-68
[6]   Potentials of cooled EGR and water injection for knock resistance and fuel consumption improvements of gasoline engines [J].
Bozza, Fabio ;
De Bellis, Vincenzo ;
Teodosio, Luigi .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 169 :112-125
[7]   Effects on knock intensity and specific fuel consumption of port water/methanol injection in a turbocharged GDI engine: Comparative analysis [J].
Breda, Sebastiano ;
Berni, Fabio ;
d'Adamo, Alessandro ;
Testa, Francesco ;
Severi, Elena ;
Cantore, Giuseppe .
70TH CONFERENCE OF THE ITALIAN THERMAL MACHINES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION, ATI2015, 2015, 82 :96-102
[8]   Fuels with low octane number: water injection as knock control method [J].
Brusca, S. ;
Galvagno, A. ;
Lanzafame, R. ;
Mauro, S. ;
Messina, M. .
HELIYON, 2019, 5 (02)
[9]  
Brusca S, 2003, 2003011912 SAE, DOI [10.4271/2003-01-1912, DOI 10.4271/2003-01-1912]
[10]  
Chang J., 2015, SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1264, DOI DOI 10.4271/2015-01-1264