Measurement validity in ophthalmology

被引:5
作者
Aslam, TM
Patton, N
机构
[1] Manchester Royal Eye Hosp, Manchester M13 9WH, Lancs, England
[2] Edinburgh Eye Pavil, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
measurement validity; ophthalmological research; visual function; quality of life; questionnaires; literature search;
D O I
10.1080/09286580590932752
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Measurements in ophthalmic research may be of parameters such as visual functions, quality of life or physical measures and can involve different types of instruments such as questionnaires and mechanical, chemical or electronic devices. Whatever the mode of measurement, however, all these devices require sufficient evidence for validity before inferences can be made on the basis of their findings. This article explores the nature and often overlooked importance of validity and explains some of the terminology involved. It discusses the main forms that ophthalmologists should be aware of before they can assess whether the instruments, old and new, are providing results upon which inferences can be made with any level of confidence. The literature search involved use of Medline, PubMed and Ovid as well as referenced papers in journals and books. Searches were comprehensive and international. Foreign texts were translated.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 161
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Anastasi A., 1988, Psychological testing
[2]  
*APA NAT COUNC MEA, 1999, STAND ED PSYCH TEST, P185
[3]  
Armitage P., 2002, STAT METHODS MED RES
[4]   Effect on glare of texturing the truncated edge of an intraocular lens [J].
Aslam, TM ;
Dhillon, B .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 121 (09) :1345-1345
[5]  
ASLAM TM, 2004, IN PRESS OPHTHALMOLO
[6]   A new measure of patient satisfaction with ocular hypotensive medications: The Treatment Satisfaction Survey for Intraocular Pressure (TSS-IOP) [J].
Mark J Atkinson ;
William C Stewart ;
Joel M Fain ;
Jeanette A Stewart ;
Ravinder Dhawan ;
Essy Mozaffari ;
Jan Lohs .
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1 (1)
[7]  
Belson W.A., 1986, VALIDITY SURVEY RES
[8]   COMPARING METHODS OF MEASUREMENT - WHY PLOTTING DIFFERENCE AGAINST STANDARD METHOD IS MISLEADING [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1995, 346 (8982) :1085-1087
[9]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[10]   Statistics notes - Validating scales and indexes [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7337) :606-607