Utility of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube in head and neck cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiation: A prospective observational cohort

被引:6
作者
Dechaphunkul, Tanadech [1 ]
Soonthornrak, Pawitra [1 ]
Geater, Sarayut Lucien [2 ]
Dechaphunkul, Arunee [3 ]
机构
[1] Prince Songkla Univ, Fac Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Hat Yai, Thailand
[2] Prince Songkla Univ, Fac Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Resp & Resp Crit Care Med, Hat Yai, Thailand
[3] Prince Songkla Univ, Fac Med, Dept Internal Med, Med Oncol Unit, Hat Yai, Thailand
关键词
Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic; gastrostomy; Head and neck cancer; Chemoradiation; Weight loss; Tube dependence; WEIGHT-LOSS; NUTRITIONAL CONCEPTS; PLACEMENT; RADIOTHERAPY; IMPACT; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103512
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: The necessity of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PPEG) before concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients remains uncertain. We evaluated the utilization rate of PPEG tube. Weight changes and tube dependence were also assessed. Materials and methods: This prospective cohort study evaluated the utilization rate of PPEG tube in patients with newly diagnosed HNC undergoing CCRT. Baseline characteristics, nutrition status, and weight loss data were collected and compared between use and non-use groups. Results: 110 patients (94.8%) used PPEG tube (70 fully-used and 40 partially-used groups). Non-users had a tendency to lose weight more than partially and fully-used groups; 9.13%, 3.42%, and 1.95%, respectively (p = 0.085). Fully-used group had significantly longer time of tube dependence than partially-used group, 7.0 months versus 4.9 months (p = 0.012). The type of PPEG tube use (full use or partial use) and presence of dysphagia were significantly related to tube dependence. The time ratio of tube dependence for partially-used patients versus fully-used patients was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.68-0.99) (p = 0.039). The time ratio for patients with symptoms of dysphagia was 1.29 (95% CI: 1.02-1.63) (p = 0.032). At the end of CCRT, 96.6% of patients agreed that PPEG tube was necessary. Conclusion: We recommend PPEG for patients undergoing CCRT. Partial use of PPEG with continuous oral intake as tolerated is strongly encouraged to maintain weight, and to reduce risk of tube dependence. Future study to evaluate effective swallowing exercise is warranted.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Gastrostomy tubes in patients with advanced head and neck cancer
    Ahmed, EA
    Samant, S
    Vieira, F
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2005, 115 (01) : 44 - 47
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2011, AJCC CANC STAGING HD
  • [3] Prophylactic Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Patients With Advanced Head and Neck Tumors Treated by Combined Chemoradiotherapy
    Assenat, Eric
    Thezenas, Simon
    Flori, Nicolas
    Pere-Charlier, Nicole
    Garrel, Renaud
    Serre, Antoine
    Azria, David
    Senesse, Pierre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2011, 42 (04) : 548 - 556
  • [4] The impact of early percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement on treatment completeness and nutritional status in locally advanced head and neck cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy
    Atasoy, Beste M.
    Yonal, Oya
    Demirel, Birsen
    Dane, Faysal
    Yilmaz, Yusuf
    Kalayci, Cem
    Abacioglu, Ufuk
    Imeryuz, Nese
    [J]. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2012, 269 (01) : 275 - 282
  • [5] Effect of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube on swallowing in advanced head and neck cancer: A randomized controlled study
    Axelsson, Lars
    Silander, Ewa
    Nyman, Jan
    Bove, Mogens
    Johansson, Leif
    Hammerlid, Eva
    [J]. HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2017, 39 (05): : 908 - 915
  • [6] Toxicities and costs of placing prophylactic and reactive percutaneous gastrostomy tubes in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers treated with chemoradiotherapy
    Baschnagel, Andrew M.
    Yadav, Siddhartha
    Marina, Ovidiu
    Parzuchowski, Aaron
    Lanni, Thomas B., Jr.
    Warner, Jillian N.
    Parzuchowski, Jeanne S.
    Ignatius, Renjitha T.
    Akervall, Jan
    Chen, Peter Y.
    Krauss, Daniel J.
    [J]. HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2014, 36 (08): : 1155 - 1161
  • [7] NUTRITIONAL-STATUS - A PROGNOSTIC INDICATOR IN HEAD AND NECK-CANCER
    BROOKES, GB
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1985, 93 (01) : 69 - 74
  • [8] Comparison of Nutritional and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy Utilizing Prophylactic versus Reactive Nutrition Support Approaches
    Brown, Teresa E.
    Banks, Merrilyn D.
    Hughes, Brett G. M.
    Lin, Charles Y.
    Kenny, Lizbeth M.
    Bauer, Judith D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2018, 118 (04) : 627 - 636
  • [9] Benefits of prophylactic percutaneous gastrostomy in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy: A multicenter analysis
    Dechaphunkul, Tanadech
    Ngamphaiboon, Nuttapong
    Danchaivijitr, Pongwut
    Jiratrachu, Rungarun
    Geater, Sarayut Lucien
    Pattaranutaporn, Poompis
    Jiarpinitnun, Chuleeporn
    Setakornnukul, Jiraporn
    Suktitipat, Bhoom
    Dechaphunkul, Arunee
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 43 (02)
  • [10] Cancer Cachexia: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications
    Donohoe, Claire L.
    Ryan, Aoife M.
    Reynolds, John V.
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2011, 2011