A comparison of the tissue classification and the segmentation propagation techniques in MRI brain image segmentation

Tissue classifications of the MRI brain images can either be obtained by segmenting the images or propagating the segmentations of the atlas to the target image. This paper compares the classification results of the direct segmentation method using FAST with those of the segmentation propagation method using nreg and the MNI Brainweb phantom images. The direct segmentation is carried out by extracting the brain and classifying the tissues by FAST. The segmentation propagation is carried out by registering the Brainweb atlas image to the target images by affine re-istration. followed bv non-riaid re2istration at different control spacing, then transl'orming the PVE (partial volurne effect) fuzzy membership images of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), grey matter (GM) and white matter (WM) of the atlas image into the tar-et space respectively. We have compared the running time. reproducibility, global and local differences between the two methods. Direct segmentation is much faster. There is no significant difference in reproducibility between the two techniques. There are significant global volume differences on some tissue types between them. Visual inspection was used to localize these differences. This study had no gold standard segmentations with which to compare the automatic segmentation solutions, but the global and local volume differences suggest that the most appropriate algorithm is likely to be application dependent.