Machine learning methods for modelling the gasification and pyrolysis of biomass and waste

被引:172
作者
Ascher, Simon [1 ]
Watson, Ian [1 ]
You, Siming [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, James Watt Sch Engn, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Lanark, Scotland
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Machine learning; Gasification; Pyrolysis; Biomass; Waste; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; PARTIAL LEAST-SQUARES; HIGHER HEATING VALUE; GAS-COMPOSITION; PREDICTION; BIOCHAR; OPTIMIZATION; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2021.111902
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Over the past two decades, the use of machine learning (ML) methods to model biomass and waste gasification/pyrolysis has increased rapidly. Only 70 papers were published in the 2000s compared to a total of 549 publications in the 2010s. However, the approaches and findings have yet to be systematically reviewed. In this work, the machine learning methods most commonly employed for modelling gasification and pyrolysis processes are discussed with reference to their applications, merits, and limitations. Whilst coefficients of determination (R-2) can be difficult to compare directly, due to some studies having greatly different approaches and aims, most studies consistently achieved a high prediction accuracy with R-2 > 0.90. Artificial neural networks have been most widely used due to their potential to learn highly non-linear input-output relationships. However, a variety of methods (e.g. regression methods, tree-based methods, and support vector machines) are appropriate depending on the application, data availability, model speed, etc. It is concluded that ML has great potential for the development of models with greater accuracy. Some advantages of machine learning models over existing models are their ability to incorporate relevant non-numerical parameters and the power to generate a multitude of solutions for a wide range of input parameters. More emphasis should be placed on model interpretability in order to better understand the processes being studied.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 102 条
[81]   A review of biomass gasification modelling [J].
Safarian, Sahar ;
Unnthorsson, Runar ;
Richter, Christiaan .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 110 :378-391
[82]   Deep learning in neural networks: An overview [J].
Schmidhuber, Juergen .
NEURAL NETWORKS, 2015, 61 :85-117
[83]   Biofuels and the need for additional carbon [J].
Searchinger, Timothy D. .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2010, 5 (02)
[84]   Tar prediction in bubbling fluidized bed gasification through artificial neural networks [J].
Serrano, Daniel ;
Castello, David .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2020, 402
[85]   Predicting the effect of bed materials in bubbling fluidized bed gasification using artificial neural networks (ANNs) modeling approach [J].
Serrano, Daniel ;
Golpour, Iman ;
Sanchez-Delgado, Sergio .
FUEL, 2020, 266
[86]   Artificial neural networks: an efficient tool for modelling and optimization of biofuel production (a mini review) [J].
Sewsynker-Sukai, Yeshona ;
Faloye, Funmilayo ;
Kana, Evariste Bosco Gueguim .
BIOTECHNOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGICAL EQUIPMENT, 2017, 31 (02) :221-235
[87]   Pyrolysis of biological wastes for bioenergy production: Thermo-kinetic studies with machine-learning method and Py-GC/MS analysis [J].
Shahbeig, Hossein ;
Nosrati, Mohsen .
FUEL, 2020, 269
[88]   Biomass pyrolysis-A review of modelling, process parameters and catalytic studies [J].
Sharma, Abhishek ;
Pareek, Vishnu ;
Zhang, Dongke .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 50 :1081-1096
[89]   Hydrogen production from biomass gasification; a theoretical comparison of using different gasification agents [J].
Shayan, E. ;
Zare, V. ;
Mirzaee, I. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 159 :30-41
[90]   Gasification of food waste in supercritical water: An innovative synthesis gas composition prediction model based on Artificial Neural Networks [J].
Shenbagaraj, Shribalaji ;
Sharma, Pankaj Kumar ;
Sharma, Amit Kumar ;
Raghav, Geetanjali ;
Kota, Karthikeya Bharadwaj ;
Ashokkumar, Veeramuthu .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2021, 46 (24) :12739-12757