Qualitative Research and Evidence-Based Practices in Psychology and Education

被引:1
作者
Busygina, Natalia P. [1 ]
Gorobtsova, Anna, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Moscow State Univ Psychol Educ, Chair Individual & Grp Psychotherapy, Fac Counseling & Clin Psychol, Moscow, Russia
来源
PSIKHOLOGICHESKAYA NAUKA I OBRAZOVANIE-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION | 2021年 / 26卷 / 06期
关键词
qualitative research; evidence-based practice; meta-synthesis; positivist and realist approaches to causality; variance theory and process theory; social validity of practice; practice implementation; context of practice; education; METASYNTHESIS;
D O I
10.17759/pse.2021260609
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The article is dedicated to the relationship of qualitative research and evidence-based movement in psychology and education. We analyze the ways in which they enrich and reshape each other. The qualitative research methods open up additional opportunities for evaluating the social validity of practices, ways of their implementation, and allow taking into account contextual factors in studying the efficacy of practices. To meet the demand to increase evidence, qualitative researchers are developing the principles and procedures of meta-synthesis (as an equivalent of meta-analysis in quantitative research) aimed at integrating the results of many qualitative studies on a specific topic. The article focuses on the role of the qualitative research methods in the development of causal explanation. We follow the realist approach to causality and accept the view that qualitative research is a particular way of identifying causal processes. The explanatory possibilities of the qualitative research methods for the studies of practice efficacy are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 127
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, REALIST THEORY SCI
[2]  
Busygina N.P., 2021, SOTSIALNYE NAUKI DET, V2, P7, DOI [10.17759/ssc.2021020101, DOI 10.17759/SSC.2021020101]
[3]   Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [J].
Cumpston, Miranda ;
Li, Tianjing ;
Page, Matthew J. ;
Chandler, Jacqueline ;
Welch, Vivian A. ;
Higgins, Julian P. T. ;
Thomas, James .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, (10)
[4]  
Erickson F., 2011, SAGE HDB QUALITATIVE, P43
[5]   Understanding Qualitative Metasynthesis Issues and Opportunities in Early Childhood Intervention Research [J].
Erwin, Elizabeth J. ;
Brotherson, Mary Jane ;
Summers, Jean Ann .
JOURNAL OF EARLY INTERVENTION, 2011, 33 (03) :186-200
[6]  
Huberman A.M., 1985, Exploring clinical methods for social research, P351
[7]  
Huberman A.M., 1989, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, V2, P55, DOI DOI 10.1080/0951839890020106
[8]   Exploring causal relationships qualitatively: An empirical illustration of how causal relationships become visible across episodes and contexts [J].
Jensen, Ruth .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL CHANGE, 2022, 23 (02) :179-196
[9]  
Joanna Briggs Institute, 2014, REV MAN 2014 ED
[10]   Using meta-synthesis to facilitate evidence-based practice [J].
Kent, Bridie ;
Fineout-Overholt, Ellen .
WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING, 2008, 5 (03) :160-162