Antral follicle count and FSH concentration after clomiphene citrate challenge test in the prediction of ovarian response during IVF treatment

被引:26
作者
Ng, EHY [1 ]
Chan, CCW [1 ]
Tang, OS [1 ]
Ho, PC [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
antral follicle count; clomiphene citrate challenge test; FSH; ovarian response;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/deh833
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: We compared: (i) antral follicle count (AFC) in the early follicular phase, after the clomiphene citrate challenge test (CCCT) and before ovarian stimulation following pituitary down-regulation; and (ii) age of women, body mass index, basal and stimulated serum FSH concentrations and AFC in predicting the ovarian response of infertile women aged < 40 years with basal FSH < 10 IU/l on recruitment in their first IVF cycle. METHODS: Two months prior to the treatment cycle, AFC and basal FSH concentration were determined on day 2-3 of a spontaneous period and on day 10 after CCCT. All women received a standard stimulation regimen. Ovarian response was represented by the number of oocytes, serum estradiol, the duration and dosage of gonadotrophins. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between basal, stimulated and down-regulated AFC. AFC achieved the best predictive value in relation to the number of oocytes, followed by combined FSH concentration (sum of the two FSH concentrations) and age of women. Both basal AFC and combined FSH concentration were predictive factors of serum estradiol concentration, whereas stimulated FSH concentration was predictive of the total dosage of gonadotrophins. CONCLUSION: Combined FSH concentration after CCCT provides additional information in predicting ovarian response.
引用
收藏
页码:1647 / 1654
页数:8
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: classifications and critical analysis of preventive measures [J].
Aboulghar, MA ;
Mansour, RT .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2003, 9 (03) :275-289
[2]   PREVALENCE OF POLYCYSTIC OVARIES IN WOMEN WITH ANOVULATION AND IDIOPATHIC HIRSUTISM [J].
ADAMS, J ;
POLSON, DW ;
FRANKS, S .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1986, 293 (6543) :355-359
[3]   Performance of basal follicle-stimulating hormone in the prediction of poor ovarian response and failure to become pregnant after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis [J].
Bancsi, LFJMM ;
Broekmans, FJM ;
Mol, BWJ ;
Habbema, JDF ;
Velde, ERT .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 79 (05) :1091-1100
[4]   Predictors of poor ovarian response in in vitro fertilization: a prospective study comparing basal markers of ovarian reserve [J].
Bancsi, LFJMM ;
Broekmans, FJM ;
Eijkemans, MJC ;
de Jong, FH ;
Habbema, JDF ;
te Velde, ER .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2002, 77 (02) :328-336
[5]   The outcome of IVF-embryo transfer treatment in patients who develop three follicles or less [J].
Biljan, MM ;
Buckett, WM ;
Dean, N ;
Phillips, SJ ;
Tan, SL .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2000, 15 (10) :2140-2144
[6]   RELATIVE INFLUENCE OF SERUM FOLLICLE-STIMULATING-HORMONE, AGE AND OTHER FACTORS ON OVARIAN RESPONSE TO GONADOTROPIN STIMULATION [J].
CAHILL, DJ ;
PROSSER, CJ ;
WARDLE, PG ;
FORD, WCL ;
HULL, MGR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1994, 101 (11) :999-1002
[7]   Use of the antral follicle count to predict the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies [J].
Chang, MY ;
Chiang, CH ;
Hsieh, TT ;
Soong, YK ;
Hsu, KH .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1998, 69 (03) :505-510
[8]   Inhibin-B as a test of ovarian reserve for infertile women [J].
Corson, SL ;
Gutmann, J ;
Batzer, FR ;
Wallace, H ;
Klein, N ;
Soules, MR .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 (11) :2818-2821
[9]   Day 3 serum inhibin B and FSH and age as predictors of assisted reproduction treatment outcome [J].
Creus, M ;
Peñarrubia, J ;
Fábregues, F ;
Vidal, E ;
Carmona, F ;
Casamitjana, R ;
Vanrell, JA ;
Balasch, J .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2000, 15 (11) :2341-2346
[10]   Predictive power of clomiphene citrate challenge test for failure of in vitro fertilization treatment [J].
Csemiczky, G ;
Harlin, J ;
Fried, G .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2002, 81 (10) :954-961