An uncertainty-quantification framework for assessing accuracy, sensitivity, and robustness in computational fluid dynamics

被引:14
作者
Rezaeiravesh, S. [1 ]
Vinuesa, R.
Schlatter, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] KTH Royal Inst Technol, SimEx FLOW, Engn Mech, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Uncertainty quantification; Computational fluid dynamics; Combined uncertainties; Polynomial chaos expansion; Gaussian process regression; LARGE-EDDY SIMULATIONS; DIRECT NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; POLYNOMIAL-CHAOS; FLOW; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jocs.2022.101688
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Combining different existing uncertainty quantification (UQ) techniques, a framework is obtained to assess a set of metrics in computational physics problems, in general, and computational fluid dynamics (CFD), in particular. The metrics include accuracy, sensitivity and robustness of the simulator's outputs with respect to uncertain inputs and parameters. These inputs and parameters are divided into two groups: based on the variation of the first group (e.g. numerical/computational parameters such as grid resolution), a computer experiment is designed, the data of which may become uncertain due to the parameters of the second group (e.g. finite time-averaging). To construct a surrogate model based on uncertain data, Gaussian process regression (GPR) with observation-dependent (heteroscedastic) noise is used. To estimate the propagated uncertainties in the simulator's outputs from the first group of parameters, a probabilistic version of the polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) is employed Global sensitivity analysis is performed using probabilistic Sobol indices. To illustrate its capabilities, the framework is applied to the scale-resolving simulations of turbulent channel and lid-driven cavity flows using the open-source CFD solver Nek5000. It is shown that at wall distances where the time-averaging uncertainty is high, the quantities of interest are also more sensitive to numerical/computational parameters. In particular for high-fidelity codes such as Nek5000, a thorough assessment of the results' accuracy and reliability is crucial. The detailed analyses and the resulting conclusions can enhance our insight into the influence of different factors on physics simulations, in particular the simulations of high-Reynolds-number turbulent flows including wall turbulence.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, 47 AIAA AER SCI M IN
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Guide: Guide for the Verification and Validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations (AIAA G-077-1998(2002)), DOI [DOI 10.2514/4.472855.001, DOI 10.2514/4.472855]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Time Series Analysis
[4]   Diagnostics for Gaussian Process Emulators [J].
Bastos, Leonardo S. ;
O'Hagan, Anthony .
TECHNOMETRICS, 2009, 51 (04) :425-438
[5]  
Blatman G., 2009, THESIS CLERMONT FERR
[6]   Large-eddy simulation of the flow in a lid-driven cubical cavity [J].
Bouffanais, Roland ;
Deville, Michel O. ;
Leriche, Emmanuel .
PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2007, 19 (05)
[7]   Robust uncertainty principles:: Exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information [J].
Candès, EJ ;
Romberg, J ;
Tao, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 2006, 52 (02) :489-509
[8]   Index of resolution quality for large eddy simulations [J].
Celik, IB ;
Cehreli, ZN ;
Yavuz, I .
JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2005, 127 (05) :949-958
[9]   Numerical prediction of turbulent flows using Reynolds-averaged NavierStokes and large-eddy simulation with uncertain inflowconditions [J].
Congedo, Pietro Marco ;
Duprat, Cedric ;
Balarac, Guillaume ;
Corre, Christophe .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN FLUIDS, 2013, 72 (03) :341-358
[10]   Bayesian emulation of complex multi-output and dynamic computer models [J].
Conti, Stefano ;
O'Hagan, Anthony .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2010, 140 (03) :640-651