Assessment of animal welfare in 80 dairy cow herds in cubicle housing - animal health and other animal-related parameters

被引:0
|
作者
Rouha-Muelleder, C. [1 ]
Palme, R. [2 ]
Waiblinger, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vet Med Univ Wien, Inst Tierhaltung & Tierschutz, Dept Nutztiere & Offentliches Gesundheitswesen Ve, Vienna, Austria
[2] Vet Med Univ Wien, Inst Biochem, Dept Biomed Wissensch, Vienna, Austria
来源
WIENER TIERARZTLICHE MONATSSCHRIFT | 2010年 / 97卷 / 9-10期
关键词
cubicle housing; diary cows; health; behaviour; animal welfare; lameness; lesions; SOCIAL-BEHAVIOR; CORTISOL METABOLITES; MILK-YIELD; CATTLE; INDICATORS; LAMENESS; SYSTEMS; RELIABILITY; PERFORMANCE; LOCOMOTION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Introduction With growing concerns about farm animal welfare (e.g. by consumers; WILDNER, 1998), knowledge about the actual situation with regard to animal welfare on farms is important. Valid assessment of animal of animal welfare requires the use of animal-based parameters, while environmental parameters alone are not sufficient (WINCKLER et al., 2003; MULLEDER et al., 2007). Suitable animal-related measurements comprise behavioural, physiological, health and, at least partly, production parameters (TERLOUW et al., 1997; KNIERIM, 1998). The aim of this study was to assess animal welfare in dairy cows in cubicle loose housing in Austria by using animal-related parameters to identify problem areas and need for improvements. Material and methods 80 dairy herds with herd size of 21 to 55 Simmental cows were visited once on 2 consecutive half days. Animal-related parameters from all parameter groups mentioned above were recorded, i.e. rising up/lying down behaviour, avoidance distance towards humans, social interactions (behaviour), lameness, skin lesions, body condition, somatic cell count in milk (health), adrenocortical activity (physiology), milk yield and cleanliness. Data collection took place in spring 2002 and from October 2002 to March 2003. Associations between animal-related parameters were calculated by means of Spearman rank correlation coefficients. Results Data revealed substantial variation between farms in most parameters and considerable problems regarding animal health and behaviour: prevalence of lameness was 36 % (0 - 77 %) and more than 50 % of the animals had tarsal or carpal lesions. More than 80 % of the animals were restricted in rising up/lying down - behaviour. Lameness was positively associated with the percentage of animals with carpal lesions (r(s)=0.343, p=0.002) and the percentage of animals with tarsal lesions (r(s)=0.486, p<0.001). Furthermore, lameness was correlated weakly with lying down problems (r(s)=0.219, p=0.051). The percentage of animals with crusts on the tarsal joint was associated with the concentration of cortisol metabolites (r(s)=0.322, p=0.004). Conclusion In conclusion, the investigated farms showed considerable problems concerning animal welfare. Although cubicle loose housing systems in principle can fulfill the needs of cows, the results point at a clear need for improvement of animal welfare on farms. This accounts especially for health problems such as lameness and carpal and tarsal lesions as well as restrictions in rising/lying down behaviour, but also social behaviour and human-animal relationships. Successful veterinary herd health management aiming at prevention of disease and increase of animal welfare needs to consider all different areas.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 241
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessment of Production Technologies on Dairy Farms in Terms of Animal Welfare
    Gaworski, Marek
    Kic, Pavel
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (14):
  • [32] Applying ethological and health indicators to practical animal welfare assessment
    Wemelsfelder, F.
    Mullen, S.
    REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2014, 33 (01): : 111 - 120
  • [33] Assessment of animal welfare in dairy cows in a farm of Comarca Lagunera, México
    Alejos-De la Fuente, Jose Isidro
    Sosa-Montes, Eliseo
    Guzman-Gonzalez, Beatriz
    Peralta-Ortiz, Jesus German
    Almaraz-Buendia, Isaac
    Torres-Cardona, Maria Guadalupe
    ECOSISTEMAS Y RECURSOS AGROPECUARIOS, 2024, 11
  • [34] Symposium review: Considerations for the future of dairy cattle housing: An animal welfare perspective
    Beaver, Annabelle
    Proudfoot, Kathryn L.
    von Keyserling, Marina A. G.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2020, 103 (06) : 5746 - 5758
  • [35] On-farm welfare assessment of dairy goat farms using animal-based indicators: the example of 30 commercial farms in Portugal
    Can, E.
    Vieira, A.
    Battini, M.
    Mattiello, S.
    Stilwell, G.
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 66 (01): : 43 - 55
  • [36] Assessment of animal welfare in dairy cattle farming - Evaluation of the Welfare Quality® Protocol
    Gieseke, D.
    Lambertz, C.
    Traulsen, Imke
    Krieter, J.
    Gauly, M.
    ZUCHTUNGSKUNDE, 2014, 86 (01): : 58 - 70
  • [37] Animal Health in Compost-Bedded Pack and Cubicle Dairy Barns in Six European Countries
    Emanuelson, Ulf
    Bruegemann, Kerstin
    Klopcic, Marija
    Leso, Lorenzo
    Ouweltjes, Wijbrand
    Zentner, Andreas
    Blanco-Penedo, Isabel
    ANIMALS, 2022, 12 (03):
  • [38] Characterization of hazards, welfare promoters and animal-based measures for the welfare assessment of dairy cows: Elicitation of expert opinion
    Bertocchi, Luigi
    Fusi, Francesca
    Angelucci, Alessandra
    Bolzoni, Luca
    Pongolini, Stefano
    Strano, Rosa Maria
    Ginestreti, Jessica
    Riuzzi, Giorgia
    Moroni, Paolo
    Lorenzi, Valentina
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2018, 150 : 8 - 18
  • [39] An evaluation of four private animal health and welfare standards and associated quality assurance programmes for dairy cow production
    More, S. J.
    Marchewka, J.
    Hanlon, A.
    Balzani, A.
    Boyle, L.
    FOOD POLICY, 2021, 105
  • [40] Animal welfare - definition, assessment and discussion with special regard to dairy cattle
    Mondon, Maiken
    Thoene-Reinekel, Christa
    Merle, Roswitha
    BERLINER UND MUNCHENER TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2017, 130 (9-10): : 369 - 376