Assessing the contingent effects of collaboration on agility performance in buyer-supplier relationships

被引:160
作者
Narayanan, Sriram [1 ]
Narasimhan, Ram [1 ]
Schoenherr, Tobias [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Eli Broad Grad Sch Management, Dept Supply Chain Management, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
Collaboration; Transaction cost economics; Trust; Buyer-supplier relationships; Supply chain management; Agility performance; TRANSACTION COSTS; DARK SIDE; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; CHAIN MANAGEMENT; FORMAL CONTRACTS; UNITED-STATES; TRUST;
D O I
10.1016/j.jom.2014.11.004
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Several studies in the buyer-supplier relationship literature have addressed the impact of collaboration on agility performance. While some studies have concluded that collaboration leads to beneficial effects, others have questioned the positive effects of collaboration on relationship performance. Drawing on contingency theory and transaction cost economics (TCE), we seek to better understand the linkage among collaboration, trust and agility performance in a buyer-supplier relationship. Further, we study the contingent influence of requirements certainty and supplier asset specificity, two key TCE constructs in buyer-supplier relationships, on the collaboration-agility performance relationship. We show that while trust mediates the impact of collaboration on agility performance, the indirect effect of collaboration on agility performance via trust is significant only beyond a threshold level of collaboration. The theoretical implication of this result is that the performance relationship is non-linear, a result that has not been recognized in current literature. The practical implication is that organizations need to establish a certain level of collaboration before its positive impact can be realized. In addition, we show that the impact of collaboration on agility performance in buyer-supplier sourcing relationships can be positive, negative or neutral depending on the levels of trust, supplier asset specificity and requirements certainty, emphasizing the need to develop contingency theories. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 154
页数:15
相关论文
共 133 条
[1]  
Anderson E, 2005, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V46, P75
[2]   A MODEL OF DISTRIBUTOR FIRM AND MANUFACTURER FIRM WORKING PARTNERSHIPS [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
NARUS, JA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1990, 54 (01) :42-58
[3]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[4]   Strategic Cost Management in Supply Chains, Part 1: Structural Cost Management [J].
Anderson, Shannon W. ;
Dekker, Henri C. .
ACCOUNTING HORIZONS, 2009, 23 (02) :201-220
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, J CONSUM PSYCHOL, V10, P71
[6]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[7]   Asset specificity, uncertainty and relational norms: an examination of coordination costs in collaborative strategic alliances [J].
Artz, KW ;
Brush, TH .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2000, 41 (04) :337-362
[8]   BEYOND CONTEXTUALIZATION: USING CONTEXT THEORIES TO NARROW THE MICRO-MACRO GAP IN MANAGEMENT RESEARCH [J].
Bamberger, Peter .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2008, 51 (05) :839-846
[9]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[10]  
Barrar P., 2006, Global outsourcing strategies