k-Resolution sequential randomization procedure to improve covariates balance in a randomized experiment

被引:1
作者
Long, Mingya [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Liuquan [1 ,2 ]
Li, Qizhai [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Acad Math & Syst Sci, Zhongguancun East Rd 55, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Math Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
北京市自然科学基金;
关键词
asymptotic variance; balancing allocation; clinical; complete randomization; Mahalanobis distance; pairwise sequential randomization; rerandomization; treatment effect; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; ALLOCATION;
D O I
10.1002/sim.9139
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Balancing allocation of assigning units to two treatment groups to minimize the allocation differences is important in biomedical research. The complete randomization, rerandomization, and pairwise sequential randomization (PSR) procedures can be employed to balance the allocation. However, the first two do not allow a large number of covariates. In this article, we generalize the PSR procedure and propose a k-resolution sequential randomization (k-RSR) procedure by minimizing the Mahalanobis distance between both groups with equal group size. The proposed method can be used to achieve adequate balance and obtain a reasonable estimate of treatment effect. Compared to PSR, k-RSR is more likely to achieve the optimal value theoretically. Extensive simulation studies are conducted to show the superiorities of k-RSR and applications to the clinical synthetic data and GAW16 data further illustrate the methods.
引用
收藏
页码:5534 / 5546
页数:13
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Amos Christopher I, 2009, BMC Proc, V3 Suppl 7, pS2
[2]  
Armitage P, 1982, Stat Med, V1, P345, DOI 10.1002/sim.4780010412
[3]   TREATMENT ALLOCATION PROCEDURE FOR SEQUENTIAL CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
BEGG, CB ;
IGLEWICZ, B .
BIOMETRICS, 1980, 36 (01) :81-90
[4]   Comparing MTI randomization procedures to blocked randomization [J].
Berger, Vance W. ;
Bejleri, Klejda ;
Agnor, Rebecca .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 (05) :685-694
[5]   A long-term comparison of pioglitazone and gliclazide in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparison trial [J].
Charbonnel, BH ;
Matthews, DR ;
Schernthaner, G ;
Hanefeld, M ;
Brunetti, P .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2005, 22 (04) :399-405
[6]   Randomization in the Design of Experiments [J].
Cox, D. R. .
INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL REVIEW, 2009, 77 (03) :415-429
[7]   FORCING A SEQUENTIAL EXPERIMENT TO BE BALANCED [J].
EFRON, B .
BIOMETRIKA, 1971, 58 (03) :403-&
[8]  
Fisher RA., 1971, DESIGN EXPT
[9]   USE OF POCOCK AND SIMONS METHOD FOR BALANCING TREATMENT NUMBERS OVER PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIAL [J].
FREEDMAN, LS ;
WHITE, SJ .
BIOMETRICS, 1976, 32 (03) :691-694
[10]   NEARLY OPTIMAL ALLOCATION OF EXPERIMENTAL UNITS USING OBSERVED COVARIATE VALUES [J].
HARVILLE, DA .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1974, 16 (04) :589-599