Radiographic assessment of ingrowth total shoulder arthroplasty

被引:220
作者
Sperling, JW
Cofield, RH
O'Driscoll, SW
Torchia, ME
Rowland, CM
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Orthoped, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Mayo Grad Sch Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Biostat, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mse.2000.109384
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Sixty-two primary ingrowth total shoulder arthroplasties, performed between 1989 and 1992 and with a minimum radiographic and clinical follow-vp of 2 years or until the time of revision surgery (mean, 4.6 years), were reviewed. To combine data on both the distribution and the thickness of periprosthetic lucency and change in component position, criteria were used to determine whether a component was radiographically "at risk" for clinical component loosening. A glenoid component was "at risk" when a complete lucent line was present, some part of it being 1.5 mm or greater in width, or when 2 of 3 or 3 of 3 independent observers identified migration or tilt of the component. A humeral component was "at risk" when a lucent line 2 mm or greater in width was present in 3 or more of 8 zones or when at least 2 of 3 independent observers identified tilt or subsidence of the component. Four (6.5%) of the 62 glenoid components and 6 (9.7%) of the 62 humeral components were judged to be "at risk." There were no identifiable patient, disease, or surgical characteristics associated with the development of an "at risk" glenoid or humeral component. Currently despite this very favorable radiographic assessment, we reserve the use of a tissue ingrowth glenoid component fbr those patients with bone loss precluding bone cement fixation with a keel type of implant. because advantages exist For use of a tissue ingrowth humeral component, a press-fitted component with ingrowth surfaces is currently used unless bone deficiencies prevent secure fixation without cement.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 513
页数:7
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], PROTHESES EPAULE CAH
  • [2] BREMS J, 1992, J SHOULDER ELB SURG, V1, P77
  • [3] Cofield R H, 1992, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, V1, P77, DOI 10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80124-9
  • [4] TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY WITH THE NEER PROSTHESIS
    COFIELD, RH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1984, 66A (06) : 899 - 906
  • [5] RECENT EXPERIENCE IN TOTAL SHOULDER REPLACEMENT
    NEER, CS
    WATSON, KC
    STANTON, FJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1982, 64 (03) : 319 - 337
  • [6] ONEILL OR, 1992, 8 OP M AM SHOULD ELB
  • [7] SPERLING JW, 1999, J SHOULDER ELB SURG, V8, P188
  • [8] Resurfacing of the glenoid in total shoulder arthroplasty - A comparison, at a mean of five years, of prostheses inserted with and without cement
    Wallace, AL
    Phillips, RL
    MacDougal, GA
    Walsh, WR
    Sonnabend, DH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1999, 81A (04) : 510 - 518