Commutability and interchangeability of commercial quality control materials with feline plasma for common biochemical analytes

被引:10
|
作者
Baral, Randolph M. [1 ,2 ]
Dhand, Navneet K. [2 ]
Freeman, Kathleen P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Paddington Cat Hosp, 210 Oxford St, Paddington, NSW 2021, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Vet Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] IDEXX Labs Ltd, Wetherby, England
关键词
Biochemistry analyzer; clinical chemistry; linear regression; Passing-Bablok; reference materials; residuals; REFERENCE INTERVALS; CLINICAL-CHEMISTRY; VALUES; SPECIFICATIONS; LABORATORIES; STRATEGIES; GUIDELINES; BREEDS;
D O I
10.1111/vcp.12357
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
BackgroundSpecies-specific plasma or serum pools are considered the ideal standard material for quality control materials (QCM) instead of commercially available human QCM. However, using plasma or serum pools is limited by volume restrictions, degradation over time, and a narrow range of analyte concentrations. Concentrations of QCM analytes should be consistent or commutable with those from species-specific plasma/serum samples, and the precision from plasma pools should be comparable or interchangeable with commercial human QCM. ObjectivesThe aims of this study were to determine the commutability and interchangeability of 2 levels of commercial QCM (MAS chemTRAK-H [CT]) with feline plasma pools (PP) from normal and renal disease cats measured using a commercial laboratory analyzer and a veterinary in-house analyzer. MethodsAgreement between the 2 analyzers was assessed for 16 analytes by correlation and Passing-Bablok regression analyses of feline plasma samples. The difference between each CT data point and the regression line (residuals) was determined and standardized, and CT were considered commutable' with PP if the standardized residual was within a range of -3 to 3. Coefficients of variation (CVs) for CT and PP for 16 analytes on 2 analyzers were compared by bootstrap analysis to determine interchangeability. ResultsMost CT analytes were within the range of patient plasma sample analytes, thus commutable. Only 2 analytes had equivalent precision for both levels of CT and both levels of PP, and 5 additional analytes had similar precision for at least one level of CT compared to at least one level of PP. ConclusionsThe QCM assessed is commutable to feline PP within the tested ranges for 2 particular analyzers. Commutability does not grant interchangeability.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 310
页数:11
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Standardization and harmonization in hematology: Instrument alignment, quality control materials, and commutability issue
    Vidali, Matteo
    Carobene, Anna
    Esposito, Sara Apassiti
    Napolitano, Gavino
    Caracciolo, Alessandra
    Seghezzi, Michela
    Previtali, Giulia
    Lippi, Giuseppe
    Buoro, Sabrina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LABORATORY HEMATOLOGY, 2021, 43 (03) : 364 - 371
  • [2] Standardization and harmonization in hematology: Instrument alignment, quality control materials, and commutability issue
    Vidali, Matteo
    Carobene, Anna
    Apassiti Esposito, Sara
    Napolitano, Gavino
    Caracciolo, Alessandra
    Seghezzi, Michela
    Previtali, Giulia
    Lippi, Giuseppe
    Buoro, Sabrina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LABORATORY HEMATOLOGY, 2020,
  • [3] Reference Intervals for Common Biochemical Analytes in Serum and Plasma of a Random Adult Population in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana
    Asare, George A.
    Nortey, Ezekiel N.
    Nkumpoi, Tabiim
    Amoah, Albert G. B.
    CLINICAL LABORATORY, 2012, 58 (7-8) : 687 - 693
  • [4] Comparisons of results between three in-house biochemistry analyzers and a commercial laboratory analyzer for feline plasma using multiple quality specifications
    Baral R.M.
    Dhand N.K.
    Krockenberger M.B.
    Govendir M.
    Comparative Clinical Pathology, 2015, 24 (5) : 1075 - 1089
  • [5] Quality Control of Next-generation Sequencing-based In vitro Diagnostic Test for Onco-relevant Mutations Using Multiplex Reference Materials in Plasma
    Liu, Donglai
    Zhou, Haiwei
    Shi, Dawei
    Shen, Shu
    Tian, Yabin
    Wang, Lin
    Lou, Jiatao
    Cong, Rong
    Lu, Juan
    Zhang, Henghui
    Zhao, Meiru
    Zhu, Shida
    Cao, Zhisheng
    Jin, Ruilin
    Wang, Yin
    Zhang, Xiaoni
    Yang, Guohua
    Wang, Youchun
    Zhang, Chuntao
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 9 (09): : 1680 - 1688