Comparison of misoprostol-only and combined mifepristone-misoprostol regimens for home-based early medical abortion in Tunisia and Vietnam

被引:32
作者
Blum, Jennifer [1 ]
Raghavan, Sheila [1 ]
Dabash, Rasha [1 ]
Nguyen Thi Nhu Ngoc [2 ]
Chelli, Hela [3 ]
Hajri, Selma
Conkling, Kathryn [1 ]
Winikoff, Beverly [1 ]
机构
[1] Gynu Hlth Projects, New York, NY 10012 USA
[2] Ctr Res & Consultancy Reprod Hlth, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[3] Matern & Neonatol Ctr Rabta El Jaberi, Tunis, Tunisia
关键词
Medical abortion; Mifepristone; Misoprostol; EARLY-PREGNANCY; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; TERMINATION; ROUTES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.03.039
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the potential advantages of combined mifepristone-misoprostol versus misoprostol-only for early medical abortion. Methods: A double-blind randomized placebo controlled study was conducted that enrolled 441 pregnant women (<63 days since last menstrual period) at 2 hospitals in Tunisia and Vietnam. The mifepristone-misoprostol group (n = 220) received 200 of mifepristone on day 1 and 800 mu g buccal misoprostol followed by placebo 3 hours later on day 2. The misoprostol-only group (n = 221) received placebo on day 1 and 1600 mu g of misoprostol (2 doses of 800 mu g, given 3 hours apart) on day 2. All medications were self-administered at home with follow-up 1 week later. The primary outcome was complete uterine evacuation without surgical intervention. Results: Successful uterine evacuation occurred for 78.0% (n = 170) of women with misoprostol only versus 92.9% (n = 195) of women with mifepristone-misoprostol (relative risk 0.84, 95% CI, 0.78-0.91; P<0.001). Ongoing pregnancy occurred for 13.8% (n = 30) of women given misoprostol-only and 1.4% (n = 3) of women given mifepristone-misoprostol (relative risk 9.63, 95% CI 2.98-31.09; P<0.001). Conclusion: Mifepristone plus misoprostol is significantly more effective than misoprostol-only for early medical abortion. Clinical trials.gov registration number: NCT00680394. (C) 2012 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 171
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration
    Altman, DG
    Schulz, KF
    Moher, D
    Egger, M
    Davidoff, F
    Elbourne, D
    Gotzsche, PC
    Lang, T
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (08) : 663 - 694
  • [2] [Anonymous], OBSTET GYNECOL
  • [3] Carbonell J L, 1997, Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care, V2, P181
  • [4] The use of misoprostol for termination of early pregnancy
    Carbonell, JLL
    Varela, L
    Velazco, A
    Fernandez, C
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 1997, 55 (03) : 165 - 168
  • [5] Concept Foundation, MED MED AB
  • [6] The true cost differential between mifepristone and misoprostol and misoprostol-alone regimens for medical abortion
    Creinin, MD
    Shore, E
    Balasubramanian, S
    Harwood, B
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2005, 71 (01) : 26 - 30
  • [7] Assessing the global availability of misoprostol
    Fernandez, Maria M.
    Coeytaux, Francine
    de Leon, Rodolfo Gomez Ponce
    Harrison, Denise L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2009, 105 (02) : 180 - 186
  • [8] A prospective randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial comparing mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol to vaginal misoprostol alone for elective termination of early pregnancy
    Jain, JK
    Dutton, C
    Harwood, B
    Meckstroth, KR
    Mishell, DR
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2002, 17 (06) : 1477 - 1482
  • [9] Misoprostol administered by epithelial routes - Drug absorption and uterine response
    Meckstroth, Karen R.
    Whitaker, Amy K.
    Bertisch, Suzanne
    Goldberg, Alisa B.
    Darney, Philip D.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 108 (03) : 582 - 590
  • [10] Comparing two early medical abortion regimens: mifepristone plus misoprostol vs. misoprostol alone
    Nguyen Thi Nhu Ngoca
    Blum, Jennifer
    Raghavan, Sheila
    Nguyen Thi Bach Nge
    Dabash, Rasha
    Diop, Ayisha
    Winikoff, Beverly
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2011, 83 (05) : 410 - 417