Prediction and characterization of protein-protein interaction networks in swine

被引:27
|
作者
Wang, Fen [1 ]
Liu, Min [1 ]
Song, Baoxing [2 ]
Li, Dengyun [2 ]
Pei, Huimin [3 ]
Guo, Yang [1 ]
Huang, Jingfei [4 ]
Zhang, Deli [2 ]
机构
[1] NW A&F Univ, Coll Life Sci, Ctr Bioinformat, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] NW A&F Univ, Coll Vet Med, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] NW A&F Univ, Coll Forestry, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Kunming Inst Zool, State Key Lab Genet Resources & Evolut, Kunming, Yunnan, Peoples R China
关键词
protein-protein interaction network; Interolog; D-MIST; M-MIST topological properties; Pfam domain annotations; GO annotations; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; IDENTIFICATION; CENTRALITY; RESOURCE; DATABASE; TOOLS;
D O I
10.1186/1477-5956-10-2
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Studying the large-scale protein-protein interaction (PPI) network is important in understanding biological processes. The current research presents the first PPI map of swine, which aims to give new insights into understanding their biological processes. Results: We used three methods, Interolog-based prediction of porcine PPI network, domain-motif interactions from structural topology-based prediction of porcine PPI network and motif-motif interactions from structural topology-based prediction of porcine PPI network, to predict porcine protein interactions among 25,767 porcine proteins. We predicted 20,213, 331,484, and 218,705 porcine PPIs respectively, merged the three results into 567,441 PPIs, constructed four PPI networks, and analyzed the topological properties of the porcine PPI networks. Our predictions were validated with Pfam domain annotations and GO annotations. Averages of 70, 10,495, and 863 interactions were related to the Pfam domain-interacting pairs in iPfam database. For comparison, randomized networks were generated, and averages of only 4.24, 66.79, and 44.26 interactions were associated with Pfam domain-interacting pairs in iPfam database. In GO annotations, we found 52.68%, 75.54%, 27.20% of the predicted PPIs sharing GO terms respectively. However, the number of PPI pairs sharing GO terms in the 10,000 randomized networks reached 52.68%, 75.54%, 27.20% is 0. Finally, we determined the accuracy and precision of the methods. The methods yielded accuracies of 0.92, 0.53, and 0.50 at precisions of about 0.93, 0.74, and 0.75, respectively. Conclusion: The results reveal that the predicted PPI networks are considerably reliable. The present research is an important pioneering work on protein function research. The porcine PPI data set, the confidence score of each interaction and a list of related data are available at (http://pppid.biositemap.com/).
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Protein Complex Prediction in Large Ontology Attributed Protein-Protein Interaction Networks
    Zhang, Yijia
    Lin, Hongfei
    Yang, Zhihao
    Wang, Jian
    Li, Yanpeng
    Xu, Bo
    IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2013, 10 (03) : 729 - 741
  • [22] Collaboration-Based Function Prediction in Protein-Protein Interaction Networks
    Rahmani, Hossein
    Blockeel, Hendrik
    Bender, Andreas
    ADVANCES IN INTELLIGENT DATA ANALYSIS X: IDA 2011, 2011, 7014 : 318 - +
  • [23] Signaling Pathway Prediction by Path Frequency in Protein-Protein Interaction Networks
    Bai, Yilan
    Speegle, Greg
    Cho, Young-Rae
    2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICINE (BIBM), 2013,
  • [24] Prediction and systematic study of protein-protein interaction networks of Leptospira interrogans
    Sun Jinchun
    Xu Jinlin
    Cao Jianping
    Liu Qi
    Guo Xiaokui
    Shi Tieliu
    Li Yixue
    CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2006, 51 (11): : 1296 - 1305
  • [25] Prediction and systematic study of protein-protein interaction networks of Leptospira interrogans
    SUN Jingchun1
    2. Biomedical Engineering
    3. Department of Microbiology and Parasitology
    4. Bioinformation Center
    Chinese Science Bulletin, 2006, (11) : 1296 - 1305
  • [26] Human protein-protein interaction prediction
    Mark D McDowall
    Michelle S Scott
    Geoffrey J Barton
    BMC Bioinformatics, 11 (Suppl 10)
  • [27] On the structure of protein-protein interaction networks
    Thomas, A
    Cannings, R
    Monk, NAM
    Cannings, C
    BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS, 2003, 31 : 1491 - 1496
  • [28] Analyzing Protein-Protein Interaction Networks
    Koh, Gavin C. K. W.
    Porras, Pablo
    Aranda, Bruno
    Hermjakob, Henning
    Orchard, Sandra E.
    JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH, 2012, 11 (04) : 2014 - 2031
  • [29] The fragility of protein-protein interaction networks
    Schneider, C. M.
    Andrade, R. F. S.
    Shinbrot, T.
    Herrmann, H. J.
    EPL, 2011, 95 (01)
  • [30] Querying Protein-Protein Interaction Networks
    Blin, Guillaume
    Sikora, Florian
    Vialette, Stephane
    BIOINFORMATICS RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS: 5TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM, ISBRA 2009, 2009, 5542 : 52 - 62