Macro- and micro-nutrient flux to a highly productive submarine bank in the Gulf of Alaska: A model-based analysis of daily and interannual variability

被引:20
作者
Cheng, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Hermann, Albert J. [1 ,2 ]
Coyle, Ken O. [3 ]
Dobbins, Elizabeth L. [1 ,2 ]
Kachel, Nancy B. [1 ,2 ]
Stabeno, Phyllis J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Joint Inst, Study Atmosphere & Ocean, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] NOAA, Pacific Marine Environm Lab, Seattle, WA 98115 USA
[3] Univ Alaska, Inst Marine Sci, Fairbanks, AK 99775 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
PROGNOSTIC NUMERICAL-MODEL; NORTHERN GULF; SHELIKOF STRAIT; COASTAL OCEAN; SHELF; PARAMETERIZATION; ECOSYSTEM; EXPLICIT; SCHEMES; BASIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.pocean.2012.01.001
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
0707 ;
摘要
Although the Gulf of Alaska is subjected to intense downwelling through much of the year, during early spring and summer, upwelling due to local wind stress curl can occur over major portions of the shelf, resulting in high production. Satellite observations indicate that shallow banks may have substantially elevated chlorophyll concentrations relative to surrounding waters during much of the summer. We use the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) and ocean observation data to examine circulation and stratification around Portlock Bank in the Gulf of Alaska, and to explore mechanisms contributing to interannual variability in the supply of iron and nitrate onto the bank in spring and summer. ROMS at 3-km resolution is coupled to a lower trophic level biology model for the Gulf of Alaska; the coupled model is driven by tidal forcing, sub-daily atmospheric forcing, freshwater runoff, and boundary and initial conditions from Simple Ocean Data Assimilation (SODA) products. Hydrographic observations were made as part of six surveys undertaken by the GLOBEC/NEP (Global Ocean Ecosystem Dynamics/Northeast Pacific) program. Modeling results suggest that iron supply to the shallow layer around Portlock Bank is controlled by both advection and vertical diffusion processes, while nitrate supply is dominated by tidally-induced vertical diffusion. Overall, higher chlorophyll concentration in summer around Portlock Bank is attributed to strong vertical mixing, which pumps nutrients onto the bank from the flanks on either side, and from the top of the bank into the euphotic zone. Recirculation attributed to tidal effects increases residence time over the bank, further enhancing potential production, but intense mixing atop the bank in early spring can lead to light limitation of phytoplankton production. We used July 2004 cruise data from Portlock Bank to help verify model results. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 77
页数:15
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   The role of tidal forcing in the Gulf of Alaska's circulation [J].
Auad, Guillermo ;
Miller, Arthur J. .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2008, 35 (04)
[2]   Photosynthetic rates derived from satellite-based chlorophyll concentration [J].
Behrenfeld, MJ ;
Falkowski, PG .
LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 1997, 42 (01) :1-20
[3]   Satellite-measured seasonal and inter-annual chlorophyll variability in the Northeast Pacific and Coastal Gulf of Alaska [J].
Brickley, PJ ;
Thomas, AC .
DEEP-SEA RESEARCH PART II-TOPICAL STUDIES IN OCEANOGRAPHY, 2004, 51 (1-3) :229-245
[4]   A reanalysis of ocean climate using Simple Ocean Data Assimilation (SODA) [J].
Carton, James A. ;
Giese, Benjamin S. .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2008, 136 (08) :2999-3017
[5]  
CHAPMAN DC, 1985, J PHYS OCEANOGR, V15, P1060, DOI 10.1175/1520-0485(1985)015<1060:NTOCSO>2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]  
Chelton DB, 1998, J PHYS OCEANOGR, V28, P433, DOI 10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028<0433:GVOTFB>2.0.CO
[8]  
2
[9]   A 3-D prognostic numerical model study of the Georges Bank ecosystem. Part I: physical model [J].
Chen, CS ;
Beardsley, R ;
Franks, PJS .
DEEP-SEA RESEARCH PART II-TOPICAL STUDIES IN OCEANOGRAPHY, 2001, 48 (1-3) :419-456
[10]   Seasonal and interannual variability in the distribution of nutrients and chlorophyll a across the Gulf of Alaska shelf:: 1998-2000 [J].
Childers, AR ;
Whitledge, TE ;
Stockwell, DA .
DEEP-SEA RESEARCH PART II-TOPICAL STUDIES IN OCEANOGRAPHY, 2005, 52 (1-2) :193-216