Enhancing research collaborations: Three key management challenges

被引:116
作者
Bammer, Gabriele [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, ANU Coll Med & Hlth Sci, Natl Ctr Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[2] Harvard Univ, Hauser Ctr Nonprofit Org, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
collaboration; integration; boundary; authorization; evaluation;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.004
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This conceptual paper explores three areas of research collaboration: (a) effectively harnessing differences, (b) setting defensible boundaries and (c) gaining legitimate authorization. The focus is on their potential lessons for individuals leading and managing research collaborations, evaluation of research partnerships and areas for further investigation. Examples from three partnerships - building the atomic bomb, the Human Genome Project and the World Commission on Dams - are used to highlight key elements of the ideas presented. The paper provides a framework for systematically thinking about integration of different perspectives and other elements essential to any particular collaboration. It also sketches out ideas for (1) managing differences which may destroy partnerships, (2) deciding what the collaboration should encompass, (3) understanding and accommodating forces which may distort what the collaboration is able to achieve, and (4) enlisting necessary supporters while preserving research independence. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:875 / 887
页数:13
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from US universities, 1981-1999 [J].
Adams, JD ;
Black, GC ;
Clemmons, JR ;
Stephan, PE .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2005, 34 (03) :259-285
[2]   HUMAN GENOME PROJECT - STILL ROOM FOR HUGO [J].
ANDERSON, C ;
ALDHOUS, P .
NATURE, 1992, 355 (6355) :4-5
[3]  
Bammer G, 2005, ECOL SOC, V10
[4]  
BAMMER G, 2005, AUSTRALAS J ENV MAN, V12, P5, DOI DOI 10.1080/14486563.2005.9725099
[5]   Scientists' collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital [J].
Bozeman, B ;
Corley, E .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2004, 33 (04) :599-616
[6]   The organization of scientific collaborations [J].
Chompalov, I ;
Genuth, J ;
Shrum, W .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2002, 31 (05) :749-767
[7]   The human genome project: Lessons from large-scale biology [J].
Collins, FS ;
Morgan, M ;
Patrinos, A .
SCIENCE, 2003, 300 (5617) :286-290
[8]   Design and the management of multi-institutional research collaborations: Theoretical implications from two case studies [J].
Corley, Elizabeth A. ;
Boardman, P. Craig ;
Bozeman, Barry .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2006, 35 (07) :975-993
[9]  
Cummings L.L., 1996, Trust in organizations, P302, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781452243610.N15
[10]   Was the human genome project worth the effort? [J].
Daiger, SP .
SCIENCE, 2005, 308 (5720) :362-364