Collaborative learning in small groups in an online course - a case study

被引:16
作者
Haugland, Mildrid Jorunn [1 ]
Rosenberg, Ivar [2 ]
Aasekjaer, Katrine [3 ]
机构
[1] Western Norway Univ Appl Sci Hogskulen Pa Vestlan, Fac Hlth & Social Sci, Dept Hlth & Functioning, Inndalsveien 28, N-5063 Bergen, Norway
[2] Western Norway Univ Appl Sci Hogskulen Pa Vestlan, Acad Affairs, Fac Hlth & Social Sci, Inndalsveien 28, N-5063 Bergen, Norway
[3] Western Norway Univ Appl Sci Hogskulen Pa Vestlan, Fac Hlth & Social Sci, Dept Hlth & Caring Sci, Inndalsveien 28, N-5063 Bergen, Norway
关键词
Collaborative learning; Small group; Online course; Case study; Qualitative study; Working process;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-022-03232-x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background The ability to learn collaboratively and work in teams is an essential competency in both educational and healthcare settings, and collaborative student activities are acknowledged as being an important part of the pedagogical approach in higher education and teaching. The course that was the focus of this research, a 15-ECTS-credit online course in philosophy of science, ethics, and research methods, was offered online as part of 11 master's-level health programmes at a university in Norway. Collaborative learning in combination with digital teaching tools was the preferred pedagogical approach in the online course. The aim of the study was to describe, explore and discuss how the students collaborated in small groups in an online course to learn. Methods We performed six focus groups and 13 individual interviews from February 2018 to May 2019, conducting a qualitative case study with a content analysis of the data collected. The participants were master students in the same faculty at a university in Norway. All the included participants had fulfilled the 15 ECTS credit course. Results Our study revealed that the collaboration in small groups resulted in three different working processes, depending on the students' ability to be flexible and take responsibility for their own and common learning. The three different working processes that emerged from our data were 1. joint responsibility - flexible organization; 2. individual responsibility - flexible organization; and 3. individual responsibility - unorganized. None of the groups changed their working process during their course, even though some experienced their strategy as inadequate. Conclusions Our study showed that despite similar factors such as context, assignments and student autonomy, the students chose different collaboration strategies to accomplish the online course learning objectives. Each group chose their own working process, but only the strategy 1. joint responsibility - flexible organization seemed to promote collaboration, discussion, and team work to complete the complex assignments in the online course. The result from our study may be helpful in designing and planning future online courses; hence online learning requires a focus on how students collaborate and learn online, to gain knowledge and understanding through group discussion.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Ali R., 2009, Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, V12, P1
[2]  
Allen I., 2013, CHANGING COURSE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1990, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
[4]  
Bang H., 2019, Effektive Ledergrupper Effective Leadership Groups, V2
[5]   Retention in Online Courses: Exploring Issues and Solutions-A Literature Review [J].
Bawa, Papia .
SAGE OPEN, 2016, 6 (01)
[6]   Learning through work: emerging perspectives and new challenges [J].
Billett, Stephen ;
Choy, Sarojni .
JOURNAL OF WORKPLACE LEARNING, 2013, 25 (04) :264-276
[7]  
Bliss C, 2019, ONLINE LEARN, V13, P1
[8]  
Cacciattolo K., 2015, EUROPEAN SCI J ESJ, V11
[9]   Interprofessional attitudes amongst undergraduate students in the health professions: A longitudinal questionnaire survey [J].
Coster, Samantha ;
Norman, Ian ;
Murrells, Trevor ;
Kitchen, Sheila ;
Meerabeau, Elizabeth ;
Sooboodoo, Enkanah ;
d'Avray, Lynda .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2008, 45 (11) :1667-1681
[10]  
Creswell J. W., 2014, RES DESIGN QUALITATI, V4th ed.