Interactions between Auditory and Vestibular Modalities during Stimulation with a Combined Vestibular and Cochlear Prosthesis

被引:8
|
作者
Phillips, James O. [1 ,3 ]
Ling, Leo [1 ]
Nowack, Amy [1 ]
Rebollar, Brenda [3 ]
Rubinstein, JayT. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Otolaryngol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Bioengn, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Seattle Childrens Hosp, Ctr Integrat Brain Res, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
Vestibular prosthesis; Cochlear prosthesis; Implant; Human; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; IMPLANTATION; NERVE; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1159/000503846
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Background: A combined vestibular and cochlear prosthesis may restore hearing and balance to patients who have lost both. To do so, the device should activate each sensory system independently. Objectives: In this study, we quantify auditory and vestibular interactions during interleaved stimulation with a combined 16-channel cochlear and 6-channel vestibular prosthesis in human subjects with both hearing and vestibular loss. Methods: Three human subjects were implanted with a combined vestibular and cochlear implant. All subjects had severe-to-profound deafness in the implanted ear. We provided combined stimulation of the cochlear and vestibular arrays and looked for interactions between these separate inputs. Our main outcome measures were electrically evoked slow-phase eye velocities during nystagmus elicited by brief trains of biphasic pulse stimulation of the vestibular end organs with and without concurrent stimulation of the cochlea, and Likert scale assessments of perceived loudness and pitch during stimulation of the cochlea, with and without concurrent stimulation of the vestibular ampullae. Results: All subjects had no auditory sensation resulting from semicircular canal stimulation alone, and no sensation of motion or slow-phase eye movement resulting from cochlear stimulation alone. However, interleaved cochlear stimulation did produce changes in the slow-phase eye velocities elicited by electrical stimulation. Similarly, interleaved semicircular canal stimulation did elicit changes in the perceived pitch and loudness resulting from stimulation at multiple sites in the cochlea. Conclusions: There are significant interactions between different sensory modalities during stimulation with a combined vestibular and cochlear prosthesis. Such interactions present potential challenges for stimulation strategies to simultaneously restore auditory and vestibular function with such an implant.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 108
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Case report: Can cochlear implant stimulation lead to improved balance even after vestibular neurectomy?
    Sluydts, Morgana
    De Laet, Chloe
    De Coninck, Liesbeth
    Blaivie, Catherine
    van Dinther, Joost J. S.
    Offeciers, Erwin
    Wuyts, Floris L.
    Zarowski, Andrzej
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [32] Cervical and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in vestibular neuritis: comparison between air- and bone-conducted stimulation
    Oh, Sun-Young
    Kim, Ji-Soo
    Yang, Tae-Ho
    Shin, Byoung-Soo
    Jeong, Seul-Ki
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2013, 260 (08) : 2102 - 2109
  • [33] Human self-motion perception during translatory vestibular and proprioceptive stimulation
    Hlavacka, F
    Mergner, T
    Bolha, B
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 1996, 210 (02) : 83 - 86
  • [34] Developmental performance between pediatric cochlear implantation candidates with and without large vestibular aqueduct syndrome
    Li, Yanhong
    Yang, Yang
    Zhang, Wanxia
    Sun, Jihang
    Liu, Bing
    Chen, Min
    Liu, Wei
    Liu, Shanshan
    Wang, Xiaoxu
    Li, Shilan
    Zhang, Jie
    Ni, Xin
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2021, 141 (03) : 250 - 255
  • [35] Visual-vestibular interactions in postural control during the execution of a dynamic task
    Leah R. Bent
    Bradford J. McFadyen
    J. Timothy Inglis
    Experimental Brain Research, 2002, 146 : 490 - 500
  • [36] Visual-vestibular interactions in postural control during the execution of a dynamic task
    Bent, LR
    McFadyen, BJ
    Inglis, JT
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2002, 146 (04) : 490 - 500
  • [37] Cross-axis adaptation improves 3D vestibulo-ocular reflex alignment during chronic stimulation via a head-mounted multichannel vestibular prosthesis
    Chenkai Dai
    Gene Y. Fridman
    Bryce Chiang
    Natan S. Davidovics
    Thuy-Anh Melvin
    Kathleen E. Cullen
    Charles C. Della Santina
    Experimental Brain Research, 2011, 210 : 595 - 606
  • [38] Time course of the subjective visual vertical during sustained optokinetic an galvanic vestibular stimulation
    Niehof, Nynke
    Perdreau, Florian
    Koppen, Mathieu
    Medendorp, W. Pieter
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 122 (02) : 788 - 796
  • [39] HUMAN PERCEPTION OF HORIZONTAL TRUNK AND HEAD ROTATION IN SPACE DURING VESTIBULAR AND NECK STIMULATION
    MERGNER, T
    SIEBOLD, C
    SCHWEIGART, G
    BECKER, W
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1991, 85 (02) : 389 - 404
  • [40] Vestibular-evoked electromyographic responses in soleus: a comparison between click and galvanic stimulation
    Watson, SRD
    Colebatch, JG
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1998, 119 (04) : 504 - 510