Comparison of the prognostic and predictive utilities of the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay and Adjuvant! for women with node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20

被引:139
作者
Tang, Gong [1 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Shak, Steven [2 ]
Paik, Soonmyung [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Anderson, Stewart J. [1 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Costantino, Joseph P. [1 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Geyer, Charles E., Jr. [3 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Mamounas, Eleftherios P. [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Wickerham, D. Lawrence [3 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Wolmark, Norman [3 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[2] Genom Hlth Inc, Redwood City, CA USA
[3] Allegheny Gen Hosp, Pittsburgh, PA 15212 USA
[4] Aultman Hlth Fdn, Canton, OH USA
[5] Div Pathol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[6] Ctr Biostat, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[7] Natl Surg Adjuvant Breast & Bowel Project Operat, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
Breast cancer; Oncotype DX; Recurrence Score; Adjuvant; Node-negative; ER-positive; GENE-EXPRESSION; TAMOXIFEN; CHEMOTHERAPY; KI67; ANASTROZOLE; VALIDATION; SIGNATURE; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-010-1331-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The Oncotype DXA (R) Recurrence Score(A (R)) (RS) is a validated genomic predictor of outcome and response to adjuvant chemotherapy in ER-positive breast cancer. Adjuvant! was developed using SEER registry data and results from the Early Breast Cancer Clinical Trialists' overview analyses to estimate outcome and benefit from adjuvant hormonal therapy and chemotherapy. In this report we compare the prognostic and predictive utility of these two tools in node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer. RS and Adjuvant! results were available from 668 tamoxifen-treated NSABP B-14 patients, 227 tamoxifen-treated NSABP B-20 patients, and 424 chemotherapy plus tamoxifen-treated B-20 patients. Adjuvant! results were also available from 1952 B-20 patients. The primary endpoint was distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI). Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the prognostic and predictive utility of RS and Adjuvant!. Both RS (P < 0.001) and Adjuvant! (P = 0.002) provided strong independent prognostic information in tamoxifen-treated patients. Combining RS and individual clinicopathologic characteristics provided greater prognostic discrimination than combining RS and the composite Adjuvant!. In the B-20 cohort with RS results (n = 651), RS was significantly predictive of chemotherapy benefit (interaction P = 0.031 for DRFI, P = 0.011 for overall survival [OS], P = 0.082 for disease-free survival [DFS]), but Adjuvant! was not (interaction P = 0.99, P = 0.311, and P = 0.357, respectively). However, in the larger B-20 sub-cohort (n = 1952), Adjuvant! was significantly predictive of chemotherapy benefit for OS (interaction P = 0.009) but not for DRFI (P = 0.219) or DFS (P = 0.099). Prognostic estimates can be optimized by combining RS and clinicopathologic information instead of simply combining RS and Adjuvant!. RS should be used for estimating relative chemotherapy benefit.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 142
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V366, P2087, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
  • [2] Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial
    Albain, Kathy S.
    Barlow, William E.
    Shak, Steven
    Hortobagyi, Gabriel N.
    Livingston, Robert B.
    Yeh, I-Tien
    Ravdin, Peter
    Bugarini, Roberto
    Boehner, Frederick L.
    Davidson, Nancy E.
    Sledge, George W.
    Winer, Eric P.
    Hudis, Clifford
    Ingle, James N.
    Perez, Edith A.
    Pritchard, Kathleen I.
    Shepherd, Lois
    Gralow, Julie R.
    Yoshizawa, Carl
    Allred, D. Craig
    Osborne, C. Kent
    Hayes, Daniel F.
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2010, 11 (01) : 55 - 65
  • [3] [Anonymous], NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology - Breast Cancer
  • [4] Studies of the potential utility of Ki67 as a predictive molecular marker of clinical response in primary breast cancer
    Assersohn, L
    Salter, J
    Powles, TJ
    A'hern, R
    Makris, A
    Gregory, RK
    Chang, J
    Dowsett, M
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2003, 82 (02) : 113 - 123
  • [5] Evaluation of ER, PgR, HER-2 and Ki-67 as predictors of response to neoadjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy for operable breast cancer
    Burcombe, RJ
    Makris, A
    Richman, PI
    Daley, FM
    Noble, S
    Pittam, M
    Wright, D
    Allen, SA
    Dove, J
    Wilson, GD
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 92 (01) : 147 - 155
  • [6] Ki67 Index, HER2 Status, and Prognosis of Patients With Luminal B Breast Cancer
    Cheang, Maggie C. U.
    Chia, Stephen K.
    Voduc, David
    Gao, Dongxia
    Leung, Samuel
    Snider, Jacqueline
    Watson, Mark
    Davies, Sherri
    Bernard, Philip S.
    Parker, Joel S.
    Perou, Charles M.
    Ellis, Matthew J.
    Nielsen, Torsten O.
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2009, 101 (10): : 736 - 750
  • [7] Dowsett M, 2009, CANCER RES, V69, p75S
  • [8] Prediction of Risk of Distant Recurrence Using the 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Node-Negative and Node-Positive Postmenopausal Patients With Breast Cancer Treated With Anastrozole or Tamoxifen: A TransATAC Study
    Dowsett, Mitch
    Cuzick, Jack
    Wale, Christopher
    Forbes, John
    Mallon, Elizabeth A.
    Salter, Janine
    Quinn, Emma
    Dunbier, Anita
    Baum, Michael
    Buzdar, Aman
    Howell, Anthony
    Bugarini, Roberto
    Baehner, Frederick L.
    Shak, Steven
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (11) : 1829 - 1834
  • [9] Elston C W, 2002, Histopathology, V41, P154
  • [10] Five versus more than five years of tamoxifen for lymph node-negative breast cancer: Updated findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-14 randomized trial
    Fisher, B
    Dignam, J
    Bryant, J
    Wolmark, N
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2001, 93 (09): : 684 - 690