Cervical Arthroplasty Using the Bryan Cervical Disc System

被引:0
|
作者
Weber, Friedrich [1 ]
Detzner, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Kliniken Stadt Koln GmbH, Neurochirurg Klin, D-51109 Cologne, Germany
来源
OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE | 2010年 / 22卷 / 5-6期
关键词
Arthroplasty; Cervical disk prolapse; Disk prosthesis; Radiculopathy; Myelopathy; Range of motion; Heterotopic ossification; INTERMEDIATE FOLLOW-UP; SINGLE-LEVEL; ADJACENT-SEGMENT; PROSTHESIS; FUSION; SPINE; ARTHRODESIS; DISEASE; REPLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00064-010-9031-8
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Treatment of radicular or myelopathic symptoms of the vertebral segments from C2 through Th1. Discogenic and/or spondylotic radiculopathy. Acute myelopathy. Acute or progressive functional neurological deficit. Persistent pain resistant toward conservative treatment for > 6 weeks. Chronic myelopathy. Spondylotic myelopathy. Infection. Tumor in the vertebral segment. Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Metabolic bone disease. Osteoporosis. Long-lasting steroid medication. Allergy to titanium, polyurethane and ethylene oxide. Bekhterev's disease. Bony segmental fusion. Instability. Using the Bryan Cervical Disc Template Set together with magnetic resonance or computer tomographic images, the exact size of the prosthesis will be selected. The patient is lying in a supine position and the level of surgery is verified fluoroscopically. Diskectomy and decompression are performed via an anterior approach. After preparation of the implant bed, the center of the disk space is established using a transverse centering tool and inserting the Bryan cervical distractor. Before the prosthesis can be inserted, the end plates have to be milled. The prosthesis is filled with sterile saline solution and inserted. Proper fitting is verified fluoroscopically. Depending on the clinical situation postoperatively, the patient is discharged. Wound clamps are distracted on day 8, support by a cervical collar is not necessary. Light physical manipulations for muscle relaxation can be performed. Since 2002, 178 patients have received at least one Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis. 92 patients had a complete follow- up. Examinations were performed 8 and 12 weeks, respectively, as well as 6 up to 44 months postoperatively. 29 patients received a hybrid implantation. Cobb's angle and range of motion were determined radiologically, the degree of heterotopic ossification was classified according to McAfee. Disk prosthesis placement was measured in relation to the dorsal edge of the vertebral body, the center of the spine, as well as the body axes. For clinical evaluation, the Oswestry Neck Disability Index was used, and the neurostatus was determined.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 479
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cervical arthroplasty with ROTAIO® cervical disc prosthesis: first clinical and radiographic outcome analysis in a multicenter prospective trial
    Obernauer, J.
    Landscheidt, J.
    Hartmann, S.
    Schubert, G. A.
    Thome, C.
    Lumenta, C.
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2016, 17
  • [32] Cervical disc arthroplasty for the treatment of spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy
    Khong, Peter
    Bogduk, Nikolai
    Ghahreman, Ali
    Davies, Mark
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 20 (10) : 1411 - 1416
  • [33] Clinical and radiologic comparison of dynamic cervical implant arthroplasty and cervical total disc replacement for single-level cervical degenerative disc disease
    Liu Shichang
    Song Yueming
    Liu Limin
    Wang Lei
    Zhou Zhongjie
    Zhou Chunguang
    Yang Xi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 27 : 102 - 109
  • [34] Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Sasso, Willa R.
    Smucker, Joseph D.
    Sasso, Maria P.
    Sasso, Rick C.
    SPINE, 2017, 42 (04) : 209 - 216
  • [35] Anterior bone loss after cervical Bryan disc arthroplasty: insight into the biomechanics following total disc replacement
    Chen, Tse-Yu
    Chen, Wen-Hsien
    Tzeng, Chung-Yuh
    Huang, Chi-Wei
    Yang, Chih-Chang
    Chen, Hsien-Te
    Chang, Chien-Chun
    Lee, Cheng-Ying
    Tsou, Hsi-Kai
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 20 (08): : 1211 - 1218
  • [36] Comparison of BRYAN Cervical Disc Arthroplasty With Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Clinical and Radiographic Results of a Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial
    Heller, John G.
    Sasso, Rick C.
    Papadopoulos, Stephen M.
    Anderson, Paul A.
    Fessler, Richard G.
    Hacker, Robert J.
    Coric, Domagoj
    Cauthen, Joseph C.
    Riew, Daniel K.
    SPINE, 2009, 34 (02) : 101 - 107
  • [37] Postoperative Segmental Malalignment After Surgery With the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis Is it Related to the Mechanics and Design of the Prosthesis?
    Walraevens, Joris R. R.
    Liu, Baoge
    Vander Sloten, Jozef
    Demaerel, Philippe
    Goffin, Jan
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2010, 23 (06): : 372 - 376
  • [38] Preoperative T1 Slope as a Predictor of Change in Cervical Alignment and Range of Motion After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty
    Zhao, Jianhui
    Jiang, Rui
    Yang, Yuhui
    Gu, Rui
    Gao, Zhongli
    Xiao, Jianlin
    Chen, Shangjun
    Yang, Modi
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2017, 23 : 5844 - 5850
  • [39] Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Comparison of National Trends and Outcomes
    Ostrov, Philip B.
    Reddy, Abhinav K.
    Ryoo, James S.
    Behbahani, Mandana
    Mehta, Ankit, I
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 160 : E96 - E110
  • [40] Cervical disc arthroplasty vs. anterior cervical discectomy and fusion-what are the outcomes?
    Torrez, Timothy
    Dong, Willie
    Philippi, Matthew
    Percin, Brittany
    Connelly, James W.
    Drain, Joseph P.
    Karamian, Brian A.
    AME MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 9