Pareto Optimal Projection Search (POPS): Automated Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning by Direct Search of the Pareto Surface

被引:7
作者
Huang, Charles [1 ]
Yang, Yong [3 ]
Panjwani, Neil [3 ]
Boyd, Stephen [2 ]
Xing, Lei [3 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Bioengn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Planning; Pareto optimization; Optimization; Medical services; Biomedical applications of radiation; Linear programming; Visualization; Automated treatment planning; pops; pareto optimal; plan optimization; VOLUMETRIC MODULATED ARC; TREATMENT PLANS; IMRT; OPTIMIZATION; QUALITY; CANCER; VMAT; HEAD; METRICS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1109/TBME.2021.3055822
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective: Radiation therapy treatment planning is a time-consuming, iterative process with potentially high inter-planner variability. Fully automated treatment planning processes could reduce a planner's active treatment planning time and remove inter-planner variability, with the potential to tremendously improve patient turnover and quality of care. In developing fully automated algorithms for treatment planning, we have two main objectives: to produce plans that are 1) Pareto optimal and 2) clinically acceptable. Here, we propose the Pareto optimal projection search (POPS) algorithm, which provides a general framework for directly searching the Pareto front. Methods: Our POPS algorithm is a novel automated planning method that combines two main search processes: 1) gradient-free search in the decision variable space and 2) projection of decision variables to the Pareto front using the bisection method. We demonstrate the performance of POPS by comparing with clinical treatment plans. As one possible quantitative measure of treatment plan quality, we construct a clinical acceptability scoring function (SF) modified from the previously developed general evaluation metric (GEM). Results: On a dataset of 21 prostate cases collected as part of clinical workflow, our proposed POPS algorithm produces Pareto optimal plans that are clinically acceptable in regards to dose conformity, dose homogeneity, and sparing of organs-at-risk. Conclusion: Our proposed POPS algorithm provides a general framework for fully automated treatment planning that achieves clinically acceptable dosimetric quality without requiring active planning from human planners. Significance: Our fully automated POPS algorithm addresses many key limitations of other automated planning approaches, and we anticipate that it will substantially improve treatment planning workflow.
引用
收藏
页码:2907 / 2917
页数:11
相关论文
共 54 条
[21]  
HOLM S, 1979, SCAND J STAT, V6, P65
[22]   Automation in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning-a review of recent innovations [J].
Hussein, Mohammad ;
Heijmen, Ben J. M. ;
Verellen, Dirk ;
Nisbet, Andrew .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 91 (1092)
[23]   Lexicographic ordering: intuitive multicriteria optimization for IMRT [J].
Jee, Kyung-Wook ;
McShan, Daniel L. ;
Fraass, Benedick A. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2007, 52 (07) :1845-1861
[24]   A Novel Reduced-Order Prioritized Optimization Method for Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning [J].
Kalantzis, Georgios ;
Apte, Aditya .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 61 (04) :1062-1070
[25]   Homogeneity Index: An objective tool for assessment of conformal radiation treatments [J].
Kataria, Tejinder ;
Sharma, Kuldeep ;
Subramani, Vikraman ;
Karrthick, K. P. ;
Bisht, Shyam S. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 37 (04) :207-213
[26]   Deep-Learning Based Prediction of Achievable Dose for Personalizing Inverse Treatment Planning [J].
Korani, M. Mardani ;
Dong, P. ;
Xing, L. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) :3724-3724
[27]   Incorporating dosimetric features into the prediction of 3D VMAT dose distributions using deep convolutional neural network [J].
Ma, Ming ;
Kovalchuk, Nataliya ;
Buyyounouski, Mark K. ;
Xing, Lei ;
Yang, Yong .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (12)
[28]  
Mayo CS, 2017, ADV RADIAT ONCOL, V2, P503, DOI 10.1016/j.adro.2017.04.005
[29]   Quantitative Metrics for Assessing Plan Quality [J].
Moore, Kevin L. ;
Brame, R. Scott ;
Low, Daniel A. ;
Mutic, Sasa .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2012, 22 (01) :62-69
[30]   A SIMPLEX-METHOD FOR FUNCTION MINIMIZATION [J].
NELDER, JA ;
MEAD, R .
COMPUTER JOURNAL, 1965, 7 (04) :308-313