Psychological impact and acceptability of magnetic resonance imaging and X-ray mammography: the MARIBS Study

被引:23
作者
Hutton, J. [1 ]
Walker, L. G. [2 ,3 ]
Gilbert, F. J. [4 ]
Evans, D. G. [5 ]
Eeles, R. [6 ,7 ]
Kwan-Lim, G. E. [6 ,7 ]
Thompson, D. [8 ]
Pointon, L. J. [9 ]
Sharp, D. M. [2 ,3 ]
Leach, M. O. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] N Lanarkshire Council, Motherwell ML1 1JE, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ Hull, Postgrad Med Inst, Inst Rehabil, Kingston Upon Hull HU3 2PG, Yorks, England
[3] Hull York Med Sch, Kingston Upon Hull HU3 2PG, Yorks, England
[4] Univ Aberdeen, Aberdeen Biomed Imaging Ctr, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland
[5] Cent Manchester Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Manchester M13 9WL, Lancs, England
[6] Canc Res UK Clin Magnet Resonance Res Grp, Inst Canc Res, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[7] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[8] Univ Cambridge, Strangeways Res Lab, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Canc Res UK Genet Epidemiol Unit, Cambridge CB1 8RN, England
[9] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Early Drug Dev Ctr, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
MARIBS; psychology; MRI; anxiety; breast cancer; HIGH FAMILIAL RISK; BREAST-CANCER; NATIONAL MULTICENTER; HOSPITAL ANXIETY; GENETIC RISK; WOMEN; MRI; HISTORY; SCALE; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.2011.1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: As part of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Breast Screening (MARIBS), Study women with a family history of breast cancer were assessed psychologically to determine the relative psychological impact and acceptability of annual screening using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and conventional X-ray mammography (XRM). METHODS: Women were assessed psychologically at baseline (4 weeks before MRI and XRM), immediately before, and immediately after, both MRI and XRM, and at follow-up (6 weeks after the scans). RESULTS: Overall, both procedures were found to be acceptable with high levels of satisfaction (MRI, 96.3% and XRM, 97.7%; NS) and low levels of psychological morbidity throughout, particularly at 6-week follow-up. Low levels of self-reported distress were reported for both procedures (MRI, 13.5% and XRM, 7.8%), although MRI was more distressing (P = 0.005). Similarly, higher anticipatory anxiety was reported before MRI than before XRM (P = 0.003). Relative to XRM, MRI-related distress was more likely to persist at 6 weeks after the scans in the form of intrusive MRI-related thoughts (P = 0.006) and total MRI-related distress (P = 0.014). More women stated that they intended to return for XRM (96.3%) than for MRI (88%; P < 0.0005). These effects were most marked for the first year of screening, although they were also statistically significant in subsequent years. CONCLUSION: Given the proven benefits of MRI in screening for breast cancer in this population, these data point to the urgent need to provide timely information and support to women undergoing MRI. British Journal of Cancer (2011) 104, 578-586. doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.1 www.bjcancer.com (C) 2011 Cancer Research UK
引用
收藏
页码:578 / 586
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Radiomics for Tumor Characterization in Breast Cancer Patients: A Feasibility Study Comparing Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Marino, Maria Adele
    Leithner, Doris
    Sung, Janice
    Avendano, Daly
    Morris, Elizabeth A.
    Pinker, Katja
    Jochelson, Maxine S.
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2020, 10 (07)
  • [22] Can glenoid wear be accurately assessed using x-ray imaging? Evaluating agreement of x-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Walch classification
    Kopka, Michaela
    Fourman, Mitchell
    Soni, Ashish
    Cordle, Andrew C.
    Lin, Albert
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2017, 26 (09) : 1527 - 1532
  • [23] Breast MRI and X-ray mammography registration using gradient values
    Garcia, Eloy
    Diez, Yago
    Diaz, Oliver
    Llado, Xavier
    Gubern-Merida, Albert
    Marti, Robert
    Marti, Joan
    Oliver, Arnau
    MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2019, 54 : 76 - 87
  • [24] Comparative Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and X-ray Examination on Knee Degenerative Osteoarthrosis
    Liu, Siyu
    Gao, Yuan
    Liu, Yu
    Xiang, Jiabing
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2019, 9 (08) : 1760 - 1764
  • [25] Eligibility for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening in the United Kingdom: Effect of Strict Selection Criteria and Anonymous DNA Testing on Breast Cancer Incidence in the MARIBS Study
    Evans, D. Gareth R.
    Lennard, Fiona
    Pointon, Linda J.
    Ramus, Susan J.
    Gayther, Simon A.
    Sodha, Nayanta
    Kwan-Lim, Gek E.
    Leach, Martin O.
    Warren, Ruth
    Thompson, Deborah
    Easton, Douglas F.
    Eeles, Rosalind
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2009, 18 (07) : 2123 - 2131
  • [26] X-Ray Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: A Clinical Comparison
    Gariani, Karim
    Lebowitz, Dan
    Kressmann, Benjamin
    Gariani, Joanna
    Uckay, Ilker
    CURRENT DIABETES REVIEWS, 2021, 17 (03) : 373 - 377
  • [27] Magnetic resonance imaging and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine in professional wrestlers and untrained men
    Hu, M.
    Sheng, J.
    Kang, Z.
    Zou, L.
    Guo, J.
    Sun, P.
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL FITNESS, 2014, 54 (04) : 505 - 510
  • [28] Comparative estimation of percentage breast tissue density for digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and magnetic resonance imaging
    Tagliafico, Alberto
    Tagliafico, Giulio
    Astengo, Davide
    Airaldi, Sonia
    Calabrese, Massimo
    Houssami, Nehmat
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2013, 138 (01) : 311 - 317
  • [29] First Multimodal Embolization Particles Visible on X-ray/Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Bartling, Soenke H.
    Budjan, Johannes
    Aviv, Hagit
    Haneder, Stefan
    Kraenzlin, Bettina
    Michaely, Henrik
    Margel, Shlomo
    Diehl, Steffen
    Semmler, Wolfhard
    Gretz, Norbert
    Schoenberg, Stefan O.
    Sadick, Maliha
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2011, 46 (03) : 178 - 186
  • [30] Shape memory polymers with enhanced visibility for magnetic resonance- and X-ray imaging modalities
    Weems, A. C.
    Szafron, J. M.
    Easley, A. D.
    Herting, S.
    Smolen, J.
    Maitland, D. J.
    ACTA BIOMATERIALIA, 2017, 54 : 45 - 57