Psychological impact and acceptability of magnetic resonance imaging and X-ray mammography: the MARIBS Study

被引:23
作者
Hutton, J. [1 ]
Walker, L. G. [2 ,3 ]
Gilbert, F. J. [4 ]
Evans, D. G. [5 ]
Eeles, R. [6 ,7 ]
Kwan-Lim, G. E. [6 ,7 ]
Thompson, D. [8 ]
Pointon, L. J. [9 ]
Sharp, D. M. [2 ,3 ]
Leach, M. O. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] N Lanarkshire Council, Motherwell ML1 1JE, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ Hull, Postgrad Med Inst, Inst Rehabil, Kingston Upon Hull HU3 2PG, Yorks, England
[3] Hull York Med Sch, Kingston Upon Hull HU3 2PG, Yorks, England
[4] Univ Aberdeen, Aberdeen Biomed Imaging Ctr, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland
[5] Cent Manchester Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Manchester M13 9WL, Lancs, England
[6] Canc Res UK Clin Magnet Resonance Res Grp, Inst Canc Res, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[7] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[8] Univ Cambridge, Strangeways Res Lab, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Canc Res UK Genet Epidemiol Unit, Cambridge CB1 8RN, England
[9] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Early Drug Dev Ctr, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
MARIBS; psychology; MRI; anxiety; breast cancer; HIGH FAMILIAL RISK; BREAST-CANCER; NATIONAL MULTICENTER; HOSPITAL ANXIETY; GENETIC RISK; WOMEN; MRI; HISTORY; SCALE; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.2011.1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: As part of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Breast Screening (MARIBS), Study women with a family history of breast cancer were assessed psychologically to determine the relative psychological impact and acceptability of annual screening using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and conventional X-ray mammography (XRM). METHODS: Women were assessed psychologically at baseline (4 weeks before MRI and XRM), immediately before, and immediately after, both MRI and XRM, and at follow-up (6 weeks after the scans). RESULTS: Overall, both procedures were found to be acceptable with high levels of satisfaction (MRI, 96.3% and XRM, 97.7%; NS) and low levels of psychological morbidity throughout, particularly at 6-week follow-up. Low levels of self-reported distress were reported for both procedures (MRI, 13.5% and XRM, 7.8%), although MRI was more distressing (P = 0.005). Similarly, higher anticipatory anxiety was reported before MRI than before XRM (P = 0.003). Relative to XRM, MRI-related distress was more likely to persist at 6 weeks after the scans in the form of intrusive MRI-related thoughts (P = 0.006) and total MRI-related distress (P = 0.014). More women stated that they intended to return for XRM (96.3%) than for MRI (88%; P < 0.0005). These effects were most marked for the first year of screening, although they were also statistically significant in subsequent years. CONCLUSION: Given the proven benefits of MRI in screening for breast cancer in this population, these data point to the urgent need to provide timely information and support to women undergoing MRI. British Journal of Cancer (2011) 104, 578-586. doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.1 www.bjcancer.com (C) 2011 Cancer Research UK
引用
收藏
页码:578 / 586
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Psychological impact and acceptability of magnetic resonance imaging and X-ray mammography: the MARIBS Study
    J Hutton
    L G Walker
    F J Gilbert
    D G Evans
    R Eeles
    G E Kwan-Lim
    D Thompson
    L J Pointon
    D M Sharp
    M O Leach
    British Journal of Cancer, 2011, 104 : 578 - 586
  • [2] The Challenge of Imaging Dense Breast Parenchyma Is Magnetic Resonance Mammography the Technique of Choice? A Comparative Study With X-Ray Mammography and Whole-Breast Ultrasound
    Pediconi, Federica
    Catalano, Carlo
    Roselli, Antonella
    Dominelli, Valeria
    Cagioli, Sabrina
    Karatasiou, Angeliki
    Pronio, AnnaMaria
    Kirchin, Miles A.
    Passariello, Roberto
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2009, 44 (07) : 412 - 421
  • [3] The UK national study of magnetic resonance imaging as a method of screening for breast cancer (MARIBS)
    Leach, MO
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2002, 21 (03) : 107 - 114
  • [4] Quantitative correlation of breast tissue parameters using magnetic resonance and X-ray mammography
    Graham, SJ
    Bronskill, MJ
    Byng, JW
    Yaffe, MJ
    Boyd, NF
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1996, 73 (02) : 162 - 168
  • [5] Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Mammography in the Evaluation of Carcinoma Breast-A Longitudinal Observational Study
    Patro, Srikant
    Swain, Narendra Nath
    Barik, Haramohan
    Sahoo, Ashish Kumar
    Swain, Soumya Ranjan
    Mishra, Ashish Kumar
    Pattnayak, Prasanjit
    Mohapatra, Kailash Chandra
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2021, 15 (06)
  • [6] Psychological status of patients with amputation injury and effects of psychological interventions based on magnetic resonance imaging and X-ray characteristics
    Tan, Jinke
    Wang, Fengling
    Zhang, Fenghong
    Wang, Haimo
    RIVISTA DI PSICHIATRIA, 2022, 57 (01) : 33 - 39
  • [7] A complete software application for automatic registration of x-ray mammography and magnetic resonance images
    Solves-Llorens, J. A.
    Ruperez, M. J.
    Monserrat, C.
    Feliu, E.
    Garcia, M.
    Lloret, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (08) : 279 - 290
  • [8] Comparison of 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging and X-ray mammography in the measurement of ductal carcinoma in situ: A comparison with histopathology
    Pickles, Martin D.
    Gibbs, Peter
    Hubbard, Anne
    Rahman, Ayesha
    Wieczorek, Joanna
    Turnbull, Lindsay W.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (04) : 603 - 610
  • [9] Projection X-ray Imaging: Radiography, Mammography, Fluoroscopy
    Seibert, James Anthony
    HEALTH PHYSICS, 2019, 116 (02): : 148 - 156
  • [10] Supplemental magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography compared with magnetic resonance imaging or mammography by extent of breast density
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Zhu, Weiwei
    Su, Yu-Ru
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Stout, Natasha K.
    Onega, Tracy
    O'Meara, Ellen S.
    Henderson, Louise M.
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Wernli, Karen
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2024, 116 (02): : 249 - 257