Frequency Excursion Likelihood Constrained Resource Scheduling for Large-Scale Renewable Energy Integration

被引:0
作者
Herath, Akila [1 ]
Manaz, M. A. Mohammed [2 ]
Liyanage, Kithsiri M. [1 ]
Masuta, Taisuke [3 ]
Lu, Chan-Nan [2 ]
Nishio, Koji [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Peradeniya, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Peradeniya 20400, Sri Lanka
[2] Natl Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Kaohsiung 804, Taiwan
[3] Meijo Univ, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Nagoya, Aichi 4688502, Japan
关键词
Costs; Renewable energy sources; Frequency control; Power systems; Uncertainty; Generators; Schedules; Flexibility; flexibility constraints; renewable energy; under; over frequency probability; unit commitment; POWER-SYSTEM FLEXIBILITY; OPERATIONAL FLEXIBILITY; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3201536
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Net-load variability and uncertainty in high renewable penetration networks have imposed new challenges to the system operators; adequate ramping, restart, and wider frequency and voltage operation capabilities provided by responsive resources are required to preserve acceptable service quality. Flexibility indicators and resource requirement constraints are proposed for unit commitment studies to address fast net-load variations. However, there is a gap in demonstrating the application of proposed flexibility indicators to determine the required minimum cost flexibility reserves to maintain desired operational performance. To address this issue for system operation planning purposes, a two-stage corrective flexibility constrained unit commitment (FCUC) formulation supported by a data-driven scheme for uncertainty quantification of flexibility shortage driven under and over frequency events is proposed. The first stage unit commitment (UC) is solved with relaxed flexibility constraints to determine the nominal resource schedules. A statistical test is used to determine if the second stage UC is needed. The second stage UC is solved with tighter flexibility constraints. A procedure to quantify the additional flexibility resources needed in the second stage UC to achieve adequate frequency regulation performance with lower operational costs is presented. Test results under various operation scenarios and comparisons with previous flexibility deployment methods illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Test results indicate that in certain situations, flexible resources should remain online and be prioritized against less flexible (although cheaper) resources. The costs incurred by the additional system flexibility required to maintain good frequency control performance can be evaluated.
引用
收藏
页码:90563 / 90575
页数:13
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   An integrated framework for operational flexibility assessment in multi-period power system planning with renewable energy production [J].
Abdin, Adam F. ;
Zio, Enrico .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 222 :898-914
[2]  
Abujarad Saleh Y., 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Power and Energy (PECon), P580, DOI 10.1109/PECON.2016.7951627
[3]   An Adjusted Weight Metric to Quantify Flexibility Available in Conventional Generators for Low Carbon Power Systems [J].
Abujarad, Saleh ;
Mustafa, Mohd Wazir ;
Jamian, Jasrul Jamani ;
Abdilahi, Abdirahman M. ;
De Kooning, Jeroen D. M. ;
Desmet, Jan ;
Vandevelde, Lieven .
ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (21)
[4]   A general-order system frequency response model incorporating load shedding: Analytic modeling and applications [J].
Aik, DLH .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2006, 21 (02) :709-717
[5]   Power system flexibility: an overview of emergence to evolution [J].
Akrami, Alireza ;
Doostizadeh, Meysam ;
Aminifar, Farrokh .
JOURNAL OF MODERN POWER SYSTEMS AND CLEAN ENERGY, 2019, 7 (05) :987-1007
[6]  
Anderson C., 2017, PROC IEEE POWER ENER, P1, DOI [10.1109/PESGM.2017.8273880, DOI 10.1109/PESGM.2017.8273880]
[7]   A LOW-ORDER SYSTEM FREQUENCY-RESPONSE MODEL [J].
ANDERSON, PM ;
MIRHEYDAR, M .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1990, 5 (03) :720-729
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1984, Reliability Evaluation of Power Systems, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-7731-7
[9]  
Berahmandpour H., 2021, AUT J. Electr. Eng, V53, P27, DOI [10.22060/EEJ.2020.18574.5358, DOI 10.22060/EEJ.2020.18574.5358]
[10]   A BASIC FRAMEWORK FOR GENERATING-SYSTEM OPERATING HEALTH ANALYSIS [J].
BILLINTON, R ;
FOTUHIFIRUZABAD, M .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1994, 9 (03) :1610-1617