Current Practices in Microvascular Reconstruction by Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

被引:3
|
作者
Sayre, Kelly S. [1 ,2 ]
Kovatch, Kevin J. [3 ,4 ]
Hanks, John E. [3 ,5 ]
Stucken, Chaz L. [3 ]
Ward, Brent B. [6 ]
机构
[1] Michigan Med, Dept Surg, Sect Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Oral Oncol & Microvasc Reconstruct Surg, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Michigan Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Head & Neck Oncol & Reconstruct Surg, Nashville, TN USA
[5] Boston Univ, Vet Adm Med Ctr, Otolaryngol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[6] Michigan Med, Dept Surg, Sch Dent, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
NECK-CANCER SURGERY; FLAP RECONSTRUCTION; HEAD; CARE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2021.04.008
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Microvascular free tissue transfer (MFTT) is a reliable reconstructive option with variation in perioperative care and a general lack of clinical practice guidelines. Oral and maxillofacial surgeons' (OMSs) current MFTT perioperative practices in the United States have not been described. This study describes these practices including surgeon practice environment, operative practices, perioperative management, and success. Methods: The study design is cross sectional. The sample is composed of OMSs who completed an Oral/Head and Neck Oncologic and Microvascular Surgery Fellowship prior to 2018 in the United States. Data were collected by means of a survey of the study sample. Descriptive statistics were reported. Results: Forty surgeons responded to the survey for a response rate of 33.9%. Respondents were 97.5% (n = 39) male and worked in private (n = 8), combination (n = 10), and academic practices (n = 23). Surgeons in private and academic practice performed an average of 23.3 (SD 13.9) and 48.6 (SD 28.6) flaps per year, respectively. The 2-team approach was used by 88.2% of surgeons Immediate dental implants were placed in osteocutaneous free flaps by 28.6% (n = 2) of private practice surgeons and 70% (n = 14) of academic surgeons. Postoperatively, most patients went to an intensive care unit (ICU) (82.7%, average duration 2.6 days). Anticoagulation or antiplatelet medications were routinely used with the most common choice being aspirin (77.4%, n = 24). Antibiotics were universally administered, often for 3 days or longer (74.2%, n = 23). Self-reported success rates were 95.3% (SD 4.1) and 96.0% (SD 1.7) in private and academic settings, respectively. Conclusion: This is the first report of practice trends by microvascular OMSs in the United States. The results of this study suggest that there is variation in MFTT operative and perioperative practices by individual surgeons and practice environment with minimal variation in self-reported success rates. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:1963 / 1969
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Microsurgical reconstruction of the head and neck - Current concepts of maxillofacial surgery in Europe
    Kansy, Katinka
    Mueller, Andreas Albert
    Muecke, Thomas
    Kopp, Jean-Baptiste
    Koersgen, Friederike
    Wolff, Klaus Dietrich
    Zeilhofer, Hans-Florian
    Hoelzle, Frank
    Pradel, Winnie
    Schneider, Matthias
    Kolk, Andreas
    Smeets, Ralf
    Acero, Julio
    Hoffmann, Juergen
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 42 (08) : 1610 - 1613
  • [42] Current practice trends in microvascular free flap reconstruction by fellowship-trained otolaryngologists
    Haidar, Yarah M.
    Walia, Sartaaj
    Tjoa, Tjoson
    Kuan, Edward C.
    Goddard, Julie A.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 46 (12) : 2120 - 2126
  • [43] The Use of Venous Coupler Device in Free Tissue Transfers for Oral and Maxillofacial Reconstruction
    Li, Rui
    Zhang, Rui
    He, Wei
    Qiao, Yongming
    Li, Wenlu
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 73 (11) : 2225 - 2231
  • [44] A Comprehensive Clinical Care Pathway for Microvascular Maxillofacial Reconstructive Surgery
    Sharkh, Haider Abo
    Madathil, Sreenath
    Al-Ghamdi, Osama
    Agnihotram, Ramanakumar, V
    Sinha, Avinash
    El-Hakim, Michel
    Nicolau, Belinda
    Makhoul, Nicholas
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 77 (11) : 2347 - 2354
  • [45] Chimeric posterior tibial artery flap: clinical application in oral and maxillofacial reconstruction
    Mashrah, M. A.
    Mai, L.
    Wan, Q.
    Pan, C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 49 (08) : 993 - 999
  • [46] Anterolateral thigh myocutaneous flaps as the preferred flaps for reconstruction of oral and maxillofacial defects
    Ren, Zhen-Hu
    Wu, Han-Jiang
    Wang, Kai
    Zhang, Sheng
    Tan, Hong Yu
    Gong, Zhao Jian
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 42 (08) : 1583 - 1589
  • [47] Reconstruction of composite oral and maxillofacial defects by free flaps based on a new classification
    Yao, Xi Yu
    Liu, Hui
    Liu, Wei Wei
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [48] State of Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstruction Current and Future Directions
    Li, Michael M.
    Miller, Lauren E.
    Old, Matthew
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 33 (04) : 711 - 721
  • [49] Cost analysis of oral and maxillofacial free flap reconstruction for patients at an institution in China
    Yang, Y.
    Li, P. -J.
    Shuai, T.
    Wang, Y.
    Mao, C.
    Yu, G. -Y.
    Guo, C. -B.
    Peng, X.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 48 (05) : 590 - 596
  • [50] MORPHOLOGICAL AND MORPHOMETRIC EVALUATION OF THE ILIUM, FIBULA, AND SCAPULA BONES FOR ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL RECONSTRUCTION
    Shahrak, Arash Zaker
    Zor, Fatih
    Kanatas, Anastasios
    Acikel, Cengizhan
    Sapountzis, Stamatis
    Nicoli, Fabio
    Altuntas, Selman Hakki
    Knobe, Matthias
    Chen, Hung-Chi
    Prescher, Andreas
    Hoelzle, Frank
    Soenmez, Tolga Taha
    MICROSURGERY, 2014, 34 (08) : 638 - 645