Current Practices in Microvascular Reconstruction by Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

被引:3
|
作者
Sayre, Kelly S. [1 ,2 ]
Kovatch, Kevin J. [3 ,4 ]
Hanks, John E. [3 ,5 ]
Stucken, Chaz L. [3 ]
Ward, Brent B. [6 ]
机构
[1] Michigan Med, Dept Surg, Sect Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Oral Oncol & Microvasc Reconstruct Surg, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Michigan Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Head & Neck Oncol & Reconstruct Surg, Nashville, TN USA
[5] Boston Univ, Vet Adm Med Ctr, Otolaryngol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[6] Michigan Med, Dept Surg, Sch Dent, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
NECK-CANCER SURGERY; FLAP RECONSTRUCTION; HEAD; CARE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2021.04.008
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Microvascular free tissue transfer (MFTT) is a reliable reconstructive option with variation in perioperative care and a general lack of clinical practice guidelines. Oral and maxillofacial surgeons' (OMSs) current MFTT perioperative practices in the United States have not been described. This study describes these practices including surgeon practice environment, operative practices, perioperative management, and success. Methods: The study design is cross sectional. The sample is composed of OMSs who completed an Oral/Head and Neck Oncologic and Microvascular Surgery Fellowship prior to 2018 in the United States. Data were collected by means of a survey of the study sample. Descriptive statistics were reported. Results: Forty surgeons responded to the survey for a response rate of 33.9%. Respondents were 97.5% (n = 39) male and worked in private (n = 8), combination (n = 10), and academic practices (n = 23). Surgeons in private and academic practice performed an average of 23.3 (SD 13.9) and 48.6 (SD 28.6) flaps per year, respectively. The 2-team approach was used by 88.2% of surgeons Immediate dental implants were placed in osteocutaneous free flaps by 28.6% (n = 2) of private practice surgeons and 70% (n = 14) of academic surgeons. Postoperatively, most patients went to an intensive care unit (ICU) (82.7%, average duration 2.6 days). Anticoagulation or antiplatelet medications were routinely used with the most common choice being aspirin (77.4%, n = 24). Antibiotics were universally administered, often for 3 days or longer (74.2%, n = 23). Self-reported success rates were 95.3% (SD 4.1) and 96.0% (SD 1.7) in private and academic settings, respectively. Conclusion: This is the first report of practice trends by microvascular OMSs in the United States. The results of this study suggest that there is variation in MFTT operative and perioperative practices by individual surgeons and practice environment with minimal variation in self-reported success rates. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:1963 / 1969
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Survey response of oral and maxillofacial surgeons on invasive procedures in patients using antithrombotic medication
    van Diermen, D. E.
    van der Waal, I.
    Hoogvliets, M. W.
    Ong, F. N.
    Hoogstraten, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 42 (04) : 502 - 507
  • [32] Microvascular reconstruction for maxillofacial defects: a retrospective analysis of outcomes and complications in 121 consecutive cases
    Kim, SeongRyoung
    Lee, Dong-Hun
    Ahn, Kang-Min
    MAXILLOFACIAL PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 42 (01)
  • [33] What explains very poor Yelp reviews of oral and maxillofacial surgeons in private practice?
    Stanbouly, Dani
    Baron, Michael
    Pierre, Ralph
    Khan, Osman A.
    Fahmy, Rana
    Caraballo, Bryan A.
    Choi, Ju Yeon
    Arce, Kevin
    Tannyhill, John
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 135 (06): : 746 - 752
  • [34] Prospects for Narrow Band Imaging Magnification Endoscopy in Oral Lesions: Recommendations from Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons and a Gastroenterologist
    Chiba, Toshimi
    Ota, Airi
    Hirano, Taifu
    Kawai, Tadashi
    Ogawa, Atsushi
    Yamada, Hiroyuki
    CANCERS, 2025, 17 (01)
  • [35] Improvement of the patient early mobilization protocol after oral and maxillofacial free flap reconstruction surgery
    Yang, Yue
    Wu, Hong-yun
    Wei, Li
    Li, Pei-jun
    Cai, Zhi-gang
    Shan, Xiao-feng
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 48 (01) : 43 - 48
  • [36] The configuration of clinics and the use of biopsy and photography in oral premalignancy: a survey of consultants of the British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
    Kanatas, A. N.
    Fisher, S. E.
    Lowe, D.
    Ong, T. K.
    Mitchell, D. A.
    Rogers, S. N.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2011, 49 (02) : 99 - 105
  • [37] A modified supraclavicular artery island flap for reconstruction of oral and maxillofacial defects
    Wang, Ruiyu
    Shao, Tingru
    Liu, Chundong
    Zhang, Xiaogen
    Lv, Xiaozhi
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 138 (04): : 469 - 474
  • [38] Comparison of postoperative complications in early versus delayed tracheostomy decannulation in patients undergoing oral cancer surgery with microvascular reconstruction
    Adhikari, Ashim
    Noor, Anthony
    Mair, Manish
    Ho, Joyce
    Fuzi, Jordan
    Giles, Mitchell
    Winters, Ryan
    Tan-Gore, Eileen
    Cope, Daron
    Hoffman, Gary
    Eisenberg, Robert
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 61 (01) : 101 - 106
  • [39] Transfer of Anterolateral Thigh Flaps in Elderly Oral Cancer Patients: Complications in Oral and Maxillofacial Reconstruction
    Ren, Zhen-Hu
    Wu, Han-Jiang
    Tan, Hong-Yu
    Wang, Kai
    Zhang, Sheng
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 73 (03) : 534 - 540
  • [40] Maxillofacial Surgeons Perception of Frequency Need for Fellowship Programs for Advanced Oral Cancer in Saudi Arabia
    Jamal, Basem T.
    CLINICAL CANCER INVESTIGATION JOURNAL, 2023, 12 (02): : 4 - 7