Current Practices in Microvascular Reconstruction by Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

被引:3
|
作者
Sayre, Kelly S. [1 ,2 ]
Kovatch, Kevin J. [3 ,4 ]
Hanks, John E. [3 ,5 ]
Stucken, Chaz L. [3 ]
Ward, Brent B. [6 ]
机构
[1] Michigan Med, Dept Surg, Sect Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Oral Oncol & Microvasc Reconstruct Surg, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Michigan Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Head & Neck Oncol & Reconstruct Surg, Nashville, TN USA
[5] Boston Univ, Vet Adm Med Ctr, Otolaryngol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[6] Michigan Med, Dept Surg, Sch Dent, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
NECK-CANCER SURGERY; FLAP RECONSTRUCTION; HEAD; CARE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2021.04.008
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Microvascular free tissue transfer (MFTT) is a reliable reconstructive option with variation in perioperative care and a general lack of clinical practice guidelines. Oral and maxillofacial surgeons' (OMSs) current MFTT perioperative practices in the United States have not been described. This study describes these practices including surgeon practice environment, operative practices, perioperative management, and success. Methods: The study design is cross sectional. The sample is composed of OMSs who completed an Oral/Head and Neck Oncologic and Microvascular Surgery Fellowship prior to 2018 in the United States. Data were collected by means of a survey of the study sample. Descriptive statistics were reported. Results: Forty surgeons responded to the survey for a response rate of 33.9%. Respondents were 97.5% (n = 39) male and worked in private (n = 8), combination (n = 10), and academic practices (n = 23). Surgeons in private and academic practice performed an average of 23.3 (SD 13.9) and 48.6 (SD 28.6) flaps per year, respectively. The 2-team approach was used by 88.2% of surgeons Immediate dental implants were placed in osteocutaneous free flaps by 28.6% (n = 2) of private practice surgeons and 70% (n = 14) of academic surgeons. Postoperatively, most patients went to an intensive care unit (ICU) (82.7%, average duration 2.6 days). Anticoagulation or antiplatelet medications were routinely used with the most common choice being aspirin (77.4%, n = 24). Antibiotics were universally administered, often for 3 days or longer (74.2%, n = 23). Self-reported success rates were 95.3% (SD 4.1) and 96.0% (SD 1.7) in private and academic settings, respectively. Conclusion: This is the first report of practice trends by microvascular OMSs in the United States. The results of this study suggest that there is variation in MFTT operative and perioperative practices by individual surgeons and practice environment with minimal variation in self-reported success rates. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:1963 / 1969
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Recent developments in delirium after oral and maxillofacial free-flap reconstruction
    Zhang, Rui
    Zhang, Wuxia
    Ren, Yanming
    Yu, Jingya
    Li, Li
    Zhang, Yuekang
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2025, 126 (01)
  • [22] "Naked Microvascular Bone Flap" in Oral Reconstruction
    Gennaro, Paolo
    Della Monaca, Marco
    Aboh, Ikenna Valentine
    Priore, Paolo
    Facchini, Arianna
    Valentini, Valentino
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2014, 73 (02) : 164 - 169
  • [23] Comment on: Practice patterns for initial management of oral leukoplakia amongst otolaryngologists and oral and maxillofacial surgeons
    Cao, Yunfeng
    Yao, Hui
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 140
  • [24] Decision making in third molar surgery: a survey of Brazilian oral and maxillofacial surgeons
    Camargo, Igor Batista
    Melo, Auremir Rocha
    Fernandes, Andre Vajgel
    Cunningham, Larry L., Jr.
    Laureano Filho, Jose R.
    Van Sickels, Joseph E.
    INTERNATIONAL DENTAL JOURNAL, 2015, 65 (04) : 169 - 177
  • [25] How Often Do Oral Maxillofacial Surgeons Lose Malpractice Cases and Why?
    He, Puhan
    Mah-Ginn, Kolina
    Karhade, Deepti Shroff
    Donoff, Bruce
    Adeeb, Nimer
    Gupta, Raghav
    Medford, Shawn
    Afshar, Salim
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 77 (12) : 2422 - 2430
  • [26] Non-suturing microvascular anastomosis in maxillofacial reconstruction- a comparative study
    Mudigonda, Surya Kiran
    Murugan, Senthil
    Velavan, K.
    Thulasiraman, Selvakumar
    Raja, V. B. Krishna Kumar
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 48 (06) : 599 - 606
  • [27] Current Concepts in Prophylactic Antibiotics in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
    Dammling, Chad
    Abramowicz, Shelly
    Kinard, Brian
    ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2022, 34 (01) : 157 - 167
  • [28] A national survey of oral and maxillofacial surgeons' attitudes towards the treatment and dental rehabilitation of oral cancer patients
    Alani, A.
    Owens, J.
    Dewan, K.
    Summerwill, A.
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2009, 207 (11) : 540 - 541
  • [29] Application of Anteromedial Thigh Flap for the Reconstruction of Oral and Maxillofacial Defects
    Gong, Zhao-Jian
    Zhang, Sheng
    Ren, Zhen-Hu
    Zhu, Zhao-Fu
    Liu, Jin-Bin
    Wu, Han-Jiang
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 72 (06) : 1212 - 1225
  • [30] Perioperative risk factors for postoperative pulmonary complications after major oral and maxillofacial surgery with microvascular reconstruction: A retrospective analysis of 648 cases
    Loeffelbein, Denys J.
    Julinek, Annette
    Wolff, Klaus-Dietrich
    Kochs, Eberhard
    Haller, Bernhard
    Haseneder, Rainer
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 44 (08) : 952 - 957