Current Practices in Microvascular Reconstruction by Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

被引:3
|
作者
Sayre, Kelly S. [1 ,2 ]
Kovatch, Kevin J. [3 ,4 ]
Hanks, John E. [3 ,5 ]
Stucken, Chaz L. [3 ]
Ward, Brent B. [6 ]
机构
[1] Michigan Med, Dept Surg, Sect Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Oral Oncol & Microvasc Reconstruct Surg, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Michigan Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Head & Neck Oncol & Reconstruct Surg, Nashville, TN USA
[5] Boston Univ, Vet Adm Med Ctr, Otolaryngol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[6] Michigan Med, Dept Surg, Sch Dent, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
NECK-CANCER SURGERY; FLAP RECONSTRUCTION; HEAD; CARE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2021.04.008
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Microvascular free tissue transfer (MFTT) is a reliable reconstructive option with variation in perioperative care and a general lack of clinical practice guidelines. Oral and maxillofacial surgeons' (OMSs) current MFTT perioperative practices in the United States have not been described. This study describes these practices including surgeon practice environment, operative practices, perioperative management, and success. Methods: The study design is cross sectional. The sample is composed of OMSs who completed an Oral/Head and Neck Oncologic and Microvascular Surgery Fellowship prior to 2018 in the United States. Data were collected by means of a survey of the study sample. Descriptive statistics were reported. Results: Forty surgeons responded to the survey for a response rate of 33.9%. Respondents were 97.5% (n = 39) male and worked in private (n = 8), combination (n = 10), and academic practices (n = 23). Surgeons in private and academic practice performed an average of 23.3 (SD 13.9) and 48.6 (SD 28.6) flaps per year, respectively. The 2-team approach was used by 88.2% of surgeons Immediate dental implants were placed in osteocutaneous free flaps by 28.6% (n = 2) of private practice surgeons and 70% (n = 14) of academic surgeons. Postoperatively, most patients went to an intensive care unit (ICU) (82.7%, average duration 2.6 days). Anticoagulation or antiplatelet medications were routinely used with the most common choice being aspirin (77.4%, n = 24). Antibiotics were universally administered, often for 3 days or longer (74.2%, n = 23). Self-reported success rates were 95.3% (SD 4.1) and 96.0% (SD 1.7) in private and academic settings, respectively. Conclusion: This is the first report of practice trends by microvascular OMSs in the United States. The results of this study suggest that there is variation in MFTT operative and perioperative practices by individual surgeons and practice environment with minimal variation in self-reported success rates. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:1963 / 1969
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Microvascular reconstructions in oral and maxillofacial surgery d Results of a survey among oral and maxillofacial surgeons in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland
    Pabst, Andreas
    Zeller, Alexander -N.
    Raguse, Jan Dirk
    Hoffmann, Juergen
    Goetze, Elisabeth
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 51 (02) : 71 - 78
  • [2] Controversies in Microvascular Maxillofacial Reconstruction
    Fagin, Adam P.
    Petrisor, Daniel
    ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2017, 29 (04) : 415 - +
  • [3] Microvascular reconstruction outcomes from a New Zealand Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Unit
    Maher, Hannah
    Simpson, Ellen
    Singh, Thasvir
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 135 (1564) : 59 - 65
  • [4] Microvascular reconstruction in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a Europe-wide data collection
    Becker, Philipp
    Zeller, Alexander-N.
    Goetze, Elisabeth
    Puladi, Behrus
    Hoelzle, Frank
    Hoffmann, Juergen
    Raguse, Jan Dirk
    Wermker, Kai
    Pabst, Andreas
    ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY-HEIDELBERG, 2025, 29 (01):
  • [5] Preliminary report of the use of a microvascular coupling device for arterial anastomoses in oral and maxillofacial reconstruction
    Chen, Z.
    Yu, M.
    Huang, S.
    Zhang, S.
    Li, W.
    Zhang, D.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 58 (02) : 194 - 198
  • [6] Microvascular Reconstruction of the Mouth, Jaws, and Face: Experience of an Australian Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Unit
    Hoffman, Gary R.
    Islam, Shofiq
    Eisenberg, Robert L.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 70 (05) : E371 - E377
  • [7] Disaster Management and the Role of Oral Maxillofacial Surgeons
    Kattimani, Vivekanand Sabanna
    Tiwari, Rahul Vinaychandra
    Pandi, Srinivas Chakravarthi
    Meka, Sridhar
    Lingamaneni, Krishna Prasad
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2015, 9 (12) : JE01 - JE04
  • [8] Current practices in microvascular reconstruction in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery
    Kovatch, Kevin J.
    Hanks, John E.
    Stevens, Jayne R.
    Stucken, Chaz L.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2019, 129 (01) : 138 - 145
  • [9] Use of a microvascular coupler device for end-to-side venous anastomosis in oral and maxillofacial reconstruction
    Wang, W. -M.
    Huang, L.
    Gao, X.
    Yuan, Y. -X.
    Chen, X. -Q.
    Jian, X. -C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 47 (10) : 1263 - 1267
  • [10] Measuring health-related benefit and quality of care in oral and maxillofacial surgery: British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Outcomes Project
    McMahon, J.
    Puglia, F.
    Martin, I.
    Mitchell, D.
    Dover, S.
    Bentley, R.
    Parmar, S.
    Smith, A. T.
    Kerawala, C.
    Holland, I.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 56 (06) : 439 - 443