A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of robot-assisted vs freehand pedicle screw fixation in spine surgery

被引:161
|
作者
Kim, Ho-Joong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jung, Whan-Ik [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chang, Bong-Soon [4 ,5 ]
Lee, Choon-Ki [4 ,5 ]
Kang, Kyoung-Tak [6 ]
Yeom, Jin S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Spine Ctr, 166 Gumiro, Sungnam 463707, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 166 Gumiro, Sungnam 463707, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, 166 Gumiro, Sungnam 463707, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Yonsei Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
free-hand technique; posterior lumbar interbody fusion; proximal facet joint violation; randomized controlled trial; robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation; FACET JOINT VIOLATIONS; LUMBAR SPINE; PLACEMENT; ACCURACY; FUSION; ECONOMICS; ADJACENT; STENOSIS;
D O I
10.1002/rcs.1779
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy and safety of an instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) using a robot-assisted minimally invasive (Robot-PLIF) or a conventional open approach (Freehand-PLIF). MethodsPatients undergoing an instrumented PLIF were randomly assigned to be treated using a Robot-PLIF (37 patients) and a Freehand-PLIF (41 patients). ResultsFor intrapedicular accuracy, there was no significant difference between the groups (P = 0.534). For proximal facet joint accuracy, none of the 74 screws in the Robot-PLIF group violated the proximal facet joint, while 13 of 82 in the Freehand-PLIF group violated the proximal facet joint (P < 0.001). The average distance of the screws from the facets was 5.2 2.1 mm and 2.7 +/- 1.6 mm in the Robot-PLIF and Freehand-PLIF groups, respectively (P < 0.001). ConclusionRobotic-assisted pedicle screw placement was associated with fewer proximal facet joint violations and better convergence orientations.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The positional consistency between guidewire and cannulated or solid screw in robot-assisted spinal internal fixation surgery
    Zhao, Jingwei
    Zhang, Yunxian
    Fan, Mingxing
    Han, Xiaoguang
    Liu, Bo
    He, Da
    Tian, Wei
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [42] Patient-specific template-guided versus standard freehand lumbar pedicle screw implantation: a randomized controlled trial
    Spirig, Jose Miguel
    Golshani, Shayan
    Farshad-Amacker, Nadja A.
    Farshad, Mazda
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2021, 35 (02) : 147 - 153
  • [43] Robot-Assisted Spine Surgery: The Pearls and Pitfalls
    Lee, Nathan J.
    Lombardi, Joseph M.
    Qureshi, Sheeraz
    Lehman, Ronald A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2025, 33 (02) : e81 - e92
  • [44] Cortical Trajectory Fixation Versus Traditional Pedicle-Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Patients with Osteoporosis: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
    Ding, Hongtao
    Hai, Yong
    Liu, Yuzeng
    Guan, Li
    Pan, Aixing
    Zhang, Xinuo
    Han, Bo
    Li, Yue
    Yin, Peng
    CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2022, 17 : 175 - 184
  • [45] Learning curves of robot-assisted pedicle screw fixations based on the cumulative sum test
    Yu, Jie
    Zhang, Qi
    Fan, Ming-Xing
    Han, Xiao-Guang
    Liu, Bo
    Tian, Wei
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2021, 9 (33) : 10134 - 10142
  • [46] Automatic Trajectory and Instrument Planning for Robot-Assisted Spine Surgery
    Vijayan, Rohan C.
    De Silva, Tharindu S.
    Han, Runze
    Uneri, Ali
    Doerr, Sophia A.
    Ketcha, Michael D.
    Perdomo-Pantoja, Alexander
    Theodore, Nicholas
    Siewerdsen, Jeffrey H.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2019: IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, ROBOTIC INTERVENTIONS, AND MODELING, 2019, 10951
  • [47] Can Radiation Exposure to the Surgeon Be Reduced With Freehand Pedicle Screw Fixation Technique in Pediatric Spinal Deformity Correction? A Prospective Multicenter Study
    Erken, H. Yener
    Burc, Halil
    Saka, Gursel
    Akmaz, Ibrahim
    Aydogan, Mehmet
    SPINE, 2014, 39 (06) : 521 - 525
  • [48] Effectiveness and safety of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw implantation in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Xu
    Li, Hao-xuan
    Zhu, Qing-san
    Zhu, Yu-hang
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2024, 47 (01)
  • [49] Association of robot-assisted techniques with the accuracy rates of pedicle screw placement: A network pooling analysis
    Wei, Fei-Long
    Gao, Quan-You
    Heng, Wei
    Zhu, Kai-Long
    Yang, Fan
    Du, Ming-Rui
    Zhou, Cheng-Pei
    Qian, Ji-Xian
    Yan, Xiao-Dong
    ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2022, 48
  • [50] Robot-assisted and fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw placement: a systematic review
    Marcus, Hani J.
    Cundy, Thomas P.
    Nandi, Dipankar
    Yang, Guang-Zhong
    Darzi, Ara
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 23 (02) : 291 - 297